UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

 

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                             Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

 

 Preliminary Proxy Statement
 Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule14a-6(e)(2))
 Definitive Proxy Statement
 Definitive Additional Materials
 Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule14a-12

FS INVESTMENT CORPORATIONKKR CAPITAL CORP. II

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 No fee required.
 Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules14a-6(i)(4) and0-11.
 1) 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

     

 2) 

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

��

     

 3) 

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

     

 4) 

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

     

 5) 

Total fee paid:

 

     

 Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:
 Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.
 1) 

Amount Previously Paid:

 

     

 2) 

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

     

 3) 

Filing Party:

 

     

 4) 

Date Filed:

 

     

 

 

 


LOGO

FS INVESTMENT CORPORATION IILOGO

201 Rouse Boulevard

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19112

[●], 20182020

Dear Fellow Stockholder:

You are cordially invited to attend a Specialthe 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of FS Investment CorporationKKR Capital Corp. II (the “Company”) to be held on [●], 20182020 at [●] [a.m.][/p.m.], Eastern Time, at the offices of the Company, located at 201 Rouse Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19112 (the “Special“Annual Meeting”).

Your vote is very important! Your immediate response will help avoid potential delays.delays and may save the Company significant additional expenses associated with soliciting stockholder votes.

The Notice of SpecialAnnual Meeting of Stockholders and proxy statement accompanying this letter provide an outline of the business to be conducted at the Special Meeting.meeting. At the Special Meeting,meeting, you will be asked to:

(i) approveelect the following individuals as Class C Directors, each of whom has been nominated for election for a new investment advisorythree year term expiring at the 2023 annual meeting of the stockholders: (a) Michael C. Forman, (b) Richard Goldstein, (c) James H. Kropp and administrative services agreement, by and between the Company and FSIC II Advisor, LLC (“FSIC II Advisor”), and a new investment advisory and administrative services agreement, by and between the Company and KKR Credit Advisors (US) LLC (“KKR Credit”), pursuant to which FSIC II Advisor and KKR Credit will act as investmentco-advisers to the Company; and(d) Elizabeth Sandler;

(ii) approve a new investment advisory and administrative services agreement, by and betweenthe application of the reduced asset coverage requirements in Section 61(a)(2) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, to the Company, and FS/KKR Advisor, LLC, a newly-formed investment adviser jointly operatedwhich would permit the Company to increase the maximum amount of leverage that it is permitted to incur by an affiliate of Franklin Square Holdings, L.P. and KKR Credit (the “Joint Advisor”), pursuant to whichreducing the Joint Advisor will act as investment adviserasset coverage requirement applicable to the Company from 200% to 150%; and

(iii) approve a proposal to allow the Company in future offerings, following the listing of the Company’s common stock on a national securities exchange, to sell its shares below net asset value per share in order to provide flexibility for future sales.

In addition to these proposals, you may be asked to consider any other matters that properly may be presented at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting, including proposals to adjourn the Annual Meeting with respect to proposals for which insufficient votes to approve were cast, and, with respect to such proposals, to permit further solicitation of additional proxies by the Company.

The Company’s board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR each of the proposals to be considered and voted on at the SpecialAnnual Meeting.No other business will be presented at the Special Meeting.

It is important that your shares be represented at the SpecialAnnual Meeting. If you are unable to attend the Special Meetingmeeting in person, I urge you to complete, date and sign the enclosed proxy card and promptly return it in the envelope provided. If you prefer, you can save time by voting through the Internet or by telephone as described in the proxy statement and on the enclosed proxy card.

Your vote and participation in the governance of the Company is very important.

Sincerely yours,

 

LOGO

Michael C. Forman

Chairman President and Chief Executive Officer


FS INVESTMENT CORPORATIONKKR CAPITAL CORP. II

201 Rouse Boulevard

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19112

NOTICE OF SPECIALANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held On [] [], 20182020

To the Stockholders of FS Investment CorporationKKR Capital Corp. II:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Special2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of FS Investment CorporationKKR Capital Corp. II, a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), will be held at 201 Rouse Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19112, on [●], 20182020 at [●] [a.m.][/p.m.], Eastern Time (the “Special“Annual Meeting”), for the following purpose:purposes:

 

1.

to approveelect the following individuals as Class C Directors, each of whom has been nominated for election for a new investment advisorythree year term expiring at the 2023 annual meeting of the stockholders: (a) Michael C. Forman, (b) Richard Goldstein, (c) James H. Kropp and administrative services agreement, by and between the Company and FSIC II Advisor, LLC (“FSIC II Advisor”), and a new investment advisory and administrative services agreement, by and between the Company and KKR Credit Advisors (US) LLC (“KKR Credit”), pursuant to which FSIC II Advisor and KKR Credit will act as investmentco-advisers to the Company; and(d) Elizabeth Sandler;

 

2.

to approve the application of the reduced asset coverage requirements in Section 61(a)(2) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, to the Company, which would permit the Company to increase the maximum amount of leverage that it is permitted to incur by reducing the asset coverage requirement applicable to the Company from 200% to 150%; and

3.

to approve a new investment advisory and administrative services agreement, by and betweenproposal to allow the Company and FS/KKR Advisor, LLC,in future offerings, following the listing of the Company’s common stock on a newly-formed investment adviser jointly operated by an affiliate of Franklin Square Holdings, L.P. and KKR Credit (the “Joint Advisor”), pursuantnational securities exchange, to which the Joint Advisor will act as investment advisersell its shares below net asset value per share in order to the Company.provide flexibility for future sales.

The Company’s board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR each of the proposals to be considered and voted on at the Special Meeting.No other business will be presented at the Special Meeting.

The Company’s board of directors has fixed the close of business on [●], 20182020 as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the SpecialAnnual Meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof.

Important notice regarding the availability of proxy materials for the Special Meeting. The Company’s proxy statement the Notice of Special Meeting of Stockholders and the proxy card are available at www.proxyvote.com.

 www.proxyvote.com. If you plan on attending the SpecialAnnual Meeting and voting your shares of common stock in person, you will need to bring photo identification in order to be admitted to the SpecialAnnual Meeting. If your shares are held through a broker and you attend the Annual Meeting in person, please bring a letter from your broker identifying you as the beneficial owner of the shares and authorizing you to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting. To obtain directions to the SpecialAnnual Meeting, please call the Company at (844) 358-7276 and select Option 1.(877)628-8575.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

LOGO

Stephen S. Sypherd

Vice President, TreasurerGeneral Counsel and Secretary

[●] 2018, 2020

Stockholders are requested to promptly authorize a proxy over the Internet or by telephone, or execute and return promptly the accompanying proxy card, which is being solicited by the board of directors of the Company. You may authorize a proxy over the Internet or by telephone by following the instructions in the proxy card. You may execute the proxy card using the methods described in the proxy card. Authorizing aExecuting the proxy card is important to ensure a quorum at the SpecialAnnual Meeting. Stockholders also have the option to authorize their proxies by telephone or through the Internet by following the instructions printed on the proxy card. Proxies may be revoked at any time before they are exercised by submitting a written notice of revocation or a subsequently executed proxy, or by attending the SpecialAnnual Meeting and voting in person.


FS INVESTMENT CORPORATIONKKR CAPITAL CORP. II

201 Rouse Boulevard

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19112

SPECIALANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held On [], 20182020

PROXY STATEMENT

INFORMATION ABOUT THE SPECIAL MEETING AND THE VOTEGENERAL

The questions and answers below highlight only selected information from this document. They do not contain all of the information that may be important to you. You should carefully read this entire document to fully understand the proposals and the voting procedures for the Special Meeting.

Why am I receiving these materials?

FS Investment Corporation II (the “Company”)This proxy statement is furnishing these materialsfurnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) of FS KKR Capital Corp. II, a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), for use at the Special2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held at [●] [a.m.] [p.m./p.m.], Eastern Time, on [●], 2018,2020, at 201 Rouse Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19112, and any adjournments or postponements thereof (the “Special“Annual Meeting”). This proxy statement and the accompanying materials are being mailed on or about [●], 20182020 to stockholders of record described below and are available atwww.proxyvote.com.

What itemsAll properly executed proxies representing shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of the Company (the “Shares”) received prior to the Annual Meeting will be considered and voted onin accordance with the instructions marked thereon. If no specification is made, the Shares will be voted FOR:

(i) the election of the following individuals as Class C Directors, each of whom has been nominated for election for a three year term expiring at the Special Meeting?2023 annual meeting of the stockholders: (a) Michael C. Forman, (b) Richard Goldstein, (c) James H. Kropp and (d) Elizabeth Sandler (the “Director Election Proposal”);

At(ii) the Special Meeting, you will be asked to:

(i)approve a new investment advisory and administrative services agreement, by and between the Company and FSIC II Advisor, LLC (“FSIC II Advisor”) (the “FSIC II Advisor InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement”), and a new investment advisory and administrative services agreement, by and between the Company and KKR Credit Advisors (US) LLC (“KKR Credit”) (the “KKR InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement” and, together with the FSIC II Advisor InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement, the “InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements”), pursuant to which FSIC II Advisor and KKR Credit will act as investmentco-advisers to the Company (such proposal the “InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Proposal”); and

(ii)approve a new investment advisory and administrative services agreement, by and between the Company and FS/KKR Advisor, LLC, a newly-formed investment adviser jointly operated by an affiliate of Franklin Square Holdings, L.P. (“FS Investments”) and KKR Credit (the “Joint Advisor”) (the “Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement”), pursuant to which the Joint Advisor will act as investment adviser to the Company (such proposal, the “Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal”).

Why am I being asked to approve the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Proposal and the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal?

The Company currently receives investment advisory and administrative services from FSIC II Advisor pursuant to the Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement, dated February 8, 2012, by and between the Company and FSIC II Advisor (the “Current Investment Advisory Agreement”). GSO / Blackstone Debt Funds Management LLC (“GDFM”) acts as the Company’s investmentsub-adviser pursuant to the InvestmentSub-Advisory Agreement, dated February 8, 2012, by and between GDFM and FSIC II Advisor (the “Current InvestmentSub-Advisory Agreement”).


As the Company announced on December 11, 2017, GDFM intends to resign as the investmentsub-adviser to the Company and terminate the Current InvestmentSub-Advisory Agreement in April 2018 (the date of such termination, the “GDFM End Date”). The Company desires to enter into a new investment advisory relationship with KKR Credit pursuant to the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements or with the Joint Advisor pursuant to the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement. The Board, including a majorityapplication of the members of the Board who are not parties to the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements or the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement, or “interested persons,” as definedreduced asset coverage requirements in Section 2(a)(19)61(a)(2) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), to the Company, which would permit the Company to increase the maximum amount of any such party has approvedleverage that it is permitted to incur by reducing the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreementsasset coverage requirement applicable to the Company from 200% to 150% (the “Leverage Proposal”); and

(iii) the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement,proposal to allow the Company in future offerings, following the listing of the Company’s common stock on a national securities exchange, to sell its Shares below net asset value per Share in order to provide flexibility for future sales (the “Share Issuance Proposal”).

For additional information regarding the risks and has deemed entry into such agreementspotential increased costs to be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. The Board is seeking the approval by the stockholders of the Company of the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Proposal and the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal.

In connectionassociated with the resignation of GDFM as the investment sub-adviser to the Company, FSIC II Advisor, GDFM and certain of their affiliates have entered into a Transition Agreement, dated December 10, 2017 (the “Transition Agreement”), which provides that GDFM will continue to act as the investment sub-adviser to the Company through the GDFM End Date and will cooperate with FSIC II Advisor in implementing the transition of investment advisory services from GDFM. GDFM has also agreed to restrictions on its ability to acquire the Company’s Shares (as defined below) and take certain other actions in respect of the Company. In addition, GDFM has agreed (i) to vote the Shares of the Company beneficially owned by GDFM, or over which GDFM has voting control, in favor of the Investment Co-Advisory Agreements Proposal and the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal and (ii) not to transfer the Shares of the Company beneficially owned by GDFM until after the approval of the Investment Co-Advisory AgreementsLeverage Proposal, andsee “Proposal 2: Approval of Application of Reduced Asset Coverage Requirements to the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal.

What will happen ifCompany to Allow the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Proposal andCompany to Double the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal are each approved?Maximum Amount of its Permitted Borrowings—Effect of Leverage on Return to Stockholders.”

If the Leverage Proposal is not approved by stockholders, the Company will continue to operate within its current 200% asset coverage requirement until (1) such time as it receives stockholder approval of a similar proposal at a future meeting or (2) one year after the Board approves application of the modified asset coverage requirements to the Company, which it has not done as of the date of this proxy statement.

Any stockholder who has given a proxy has the right to revoke it at any time prior to its exercise. Any stockholder who executes a proxy may revoke it with respect to any proposal by attending the Annual Meeting and voting his or her Shares in person, or by submitting a letter of revocation or a later-dated proxy to the Company at the above address prior to the date of the Annual Meeting.

1


Quorum

Stockholders of the Company approveare entitled to one vote for each Share held. Under the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal, then the Joint Advisor would serve as investment adviser to the Company pursuant to the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement fromSecond Articles of Amendment and after the Joint Advisor Effective Date (as defined herein). The “Joint Advisor Effective Date” means such date that (i) the stockholdersRestatement of the Company, and certain other business development companies (“BDCs”) sponsored by FS Investments, specifically, FS Investment Corporation (“FSIC”), FS Investment Corporation III (“FSIC III”) and FS Investment Corporation IV (“FSIC IV”), the stockholders of a BDC currently advised by KKR Credit, specifically, Corporate Capital Trust, Inc. (“CCT”), and the board of trustees and stockholders of a BDC currently sub-advised by KKR Credit, specifically, Corporate Capital Trust II (“CCT II”), approve their respective investment advisory agreements with the Joint Advisor, and (ii) Exemptive Relief (as defined herein) has been obtained.

If the stockholders of the Company approve the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Proposal, FSIC II Advisor and KKR Credit would serve as investmentco-advisers to the Company pursuant to the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements from the Closing Date (as defined herein) until the Joint Advisor Effective Date. The “Closing Date” means the first day of the month immediately following the month in which the last of the following occurs: (i) the stockholders of the Company approve both the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Proposal and the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal and (ii) either (X) the stockholders of FSIC approve (1) an investment advisory agreement with the Joint Advisor (the “FSIC Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement”) and (2) investment advisory agreements with each of FB Income Advisor, LLC, the current investment adviser to FSIC (“FB Income Advisor”), and KKR Credit (collectively, the “FSIC InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements”) or (Y) the stockholders of FSIC III approve (A) an investment advisory and administrative services agreement with the Joint Advisor (the “FSIC III Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement”) and (B) investment advisory and administrative services agreements with each of FSIC III Advisor, LLC, the current investment adviser to FSIC III (“FSIC III Advisor”), and KKR Credit (collectively, the “FSIC III InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements”).

2


If the Joint Advisor Effective Date occurs on the same day as the Closing Date, then the Joint Advisor would serve as investment adviser to the Company pursuant to the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement and the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements would not become effective. If the Joint Advisor Effective Date occurs after the Closing Date, then FSIC II Advisor and KKR Credit would serve as investmentco-advisers to the Company pursuant to the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements from the Closing Date until the Joint Advisor Effective Date, and the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements would automatically terminate upon the effectiveness of the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement.

Accordingly, in order for FSIC II Advisor and KKR Credit to serve as investmentco-advisers to the Company pursuant to the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements, the stockholders of the Company must approve the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Proposal and the other conditions to the Closing Date must be satisfied or (to the extent permitted) waived, and in order for the Joint Advisor to serve as investment adviser to the Company pursuant to the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement, the stockholders of the Company must approve the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal and the other conditions to the Joint Advisor Effective Date must be satisfied or (to the extent permitted) waived.

FSIC II Advisor, together with FSIC III Advisor, FB Income Advisor and FSIC IV Advisor, LLC, the investment adviser to FSIC IV (collectively, the “FS Advisor Entities”), and KKR Credit have agreed to coordinate their activities during the period in which the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements and the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement would be in effect to avoid duplication of efforts and ensure a balanced and effective allocation of responsibilities and net fee revenue earned by the FS Advisor Entities, KKR Credit and the Joint Advisor, and efficiency in the provision of the required services to the Company thereunder. Depending on the timing and sequencing of obtaining stockholder approval for the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Proposal and the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal, the Company may enter into an interim investment advisory agreement pursuant to Rule15a-4one-third of the 1940 Act with KKR Credit.

Whatnumber of Shares entitled to cast votes, present in person or by proxy, constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business. Abstentions will happen ifbe treated as Shares that are present for purposes of determining the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Proposal and/or the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal are not approved?

The InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Proposal and the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal are not contingent on one another. However, if the stockholderspresence of the Company do not approve both the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Proposal and the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal, then the Board will consider and evaluate its options to determine what alternatives are in the Company’s best interests and that of the Company’s stockholders. GDFM intends to resign as the Company’s investmentsub-adviser regardless of whether the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Proposal or the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal is approved.

How does the Board recommend voting on the proposalsa quorum for transacting business at the Special Meeting?Annual Meeting.

The Board unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Proposal and “FOR” the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal.Adjournments

Will the base management fee and the incentive fee that the Company pays under the Current Investment Advisory Agreement change under the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements or the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement?

The base management fee will be reduced from 1.75% under the Current Investment Advisory Agreement to 1.50% under the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements (in the aggregate) and the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement. While the Current Investment Advisory Agreement provides that the base management fee is 2.0%, effective March 5, 2015, FSIC II Advisor contractually agreed to permanently waive 0.25% of the base management fee so that the fee received equals 1.75% of the Company’s average weekly gross assets.

3


Under the Current Investment Advisory Agreement, (i) the hurdle rate is 1.875% per quarter and (ii) the“catch-up” feature begins at 2.34375%. Under the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements (in the aggregate) and the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement, (i) the hurdle rate will be reduced to 1.75% per quarter and (ii) the“catch-up” feature will be reduced to begin at 2.1875%. The incentive fee under the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements (in the aggregate) and the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement will otherwise remain unchanged. See “Proposal 1—Terms of the FSIC II Advisor InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement—Fees and Expenses,” “Proposal 1—Terms of the KKR InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement—Fees and Expenses” and “Proposal 2—Terms of the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement—Fees and Expenses.” As a result of the reduction to the hurdle rate, the payment by the Company of the subordinated incentive fee on income will be triggered at a lower threshold than under the Current Investment Advisory Agreement.

Will the composition of the Board change following entry into the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements and/or the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement?

On the date that is the later of the Closing Date and the date on which the stockholders of the Company approve either or both the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Proposal and the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal (such applicable date, the “Board Appointment Date”), then, subject to nomination by and approval of the Board, FSIC II Advisor (acting collectively with the other FS Advisor Entities) and KKR Credit have agreed that they will each be entitled to recommend the appointment of one “interested” director to the Board, to the extent that the applicable party does not have an appointee on the Board at such time. In the event that either FSIC II Advisor (acting collectively witha quorum is not present at the other FS Advisor Entities) or KKR Credit hasAnnual Meeting, the chairman of the Annual Meeting shall have the power to adjourn the Annual Meeting from time to time to a date not more than 120 days after the original record date without notice, other than the announcement at the Annual Meeting to permit further solicitation of proxies. Any business that might have been transacted at the Annual Meeting originally called may be transacted at any such adjourned session(s) at which a quorum is present.

If it appears that there are not enough votes to approve any proposal at the Annual Meeting, the chairman of the Annual Meeting may adjourn the Annual Meeting from time to time to a date not more than 120 days after the record date originally fixed for the Annual Meeting without notice, other than announcement at the Annual Meeting, to permit further solicitation of proxies. The persons named as proxies will vote those proxies for such adjournment.

If sufficient votes in favor of one appointee serving as an “interested” director toor more proposals have been received by the Board, such party will use its reasonable best efforts to causetime of the resignation of such excess number of its appointed “interested” directors as promptly as practicable, but no later than twelve months followingAnnual Meeting, the Board Appointment Date. In addition, FSIC II Advisor has agreed that KKR Creditproposals will be entitledacted upon and such actions will be final, regardless of any subsequent adjournment to recommend, subject to approval by the “independent” directors and approval by the Board, the appointment of one “independent” director to the Board on the Board Appointment Date.consider other proposals.

Will the officers change following entry into the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements and/or the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement?

The officers of the Company are not expected to change following entry into the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements and/or the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement.

What is the “Record Date” and what does it mean?Record Date

The record date for the Special Meeting isBoard has fixed the close of business on [●], 20182020 as the record date (the “Record Date”). The Record Date is established by for the Board, and only holdersdetermination of record of the Company’s shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Shares”), at the close of business on the Record Date arestockholders entitled to receive notice of, the Special Meeting and to vote at, the SpecialAnnual Meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof. As of the Record Date, there were [●] Shares outstanding.

AsRequired Vote

Director Election Proposal. Each director nominee shall be elected by a plurality of all the Company announcedvotes cast at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy, provided that a quorum is present. Plurality voting means that the director nominee with the most votes for a particular seat is elected for that seat. Each Share may be voted for as many individuals as there are director nominees and for whose election the share is entitled to be voted. Abstentions will not be included in determining the number of votes cast and, as a result, will not have any effect on December 11, 2017, the Company has commenced a tender offer for the Shares that will expire on January 10, 2018, unless the offer is extended. Holders of record of Shares asresult of the Record Datevote with respect to the Director Election Proposal. There will continuebe no cumulative voting with respect to the Director Election Proposal.

Leverage Proposal. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy, provided that a quorum is present, is required to approve the Leverage Proposal. Abstentions will not be included in determining the number of votes cast and, as a result, will not have any effect on the rightresult of the vote with respect to the Leverage Proposal.

Share Issuance Proposal. The approval of the Share Issuance Proposal requires the affirmative vote of the stockholders holding (1) a majority of the outstanding Shares entitled to vote at the SpecialAnnual Meeting (or any postponement or adjournment thereof) notwithstandingand (2) a majority of outstanding Shares entitled to vote at the factAnnual Meeting that suchare not held by affiliated persons of the Company. Under the 1940 Act, a majority of the outstanding Shares may be the lesser of: (1) 67% of the Shares at the Annual Meeting if the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding Shares are tenderedpresent or represented by proxy or (2) more than 50% of the outstanding Shares. Abstentions will not count as affirmative votes cast and will therefore have the same effect as votes against the Share Issuance Proposal.

2


BrokerNon-Votes

Shares for which brokers have not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the Shares and do not have, or choose not to exercise, discretionary authority to vote the CompanyShares on certain proposals (which are considered“broker non-votes” with respect to such proposals) will be treated as Shares present for quorum purposes. Because the Director Election Proposal, the Leverage Proposal and the Share Issuance Proposals arenon-routine matters, brokers will not have discretionary authority to vote on the matter.Broker non-votes are not considered votes cast and thus have no effect on the Director Election Proposal or the Leverage Proposal. Brokernon-votes will not count as affirmative votes cast and will therefore have the same effect as votes against the Share Issuance Proposal.

Householding

Mailings for multiple stockholders going to a single household are combined by delivering to that address, in a single envelope, a copy of the tender offerdocuments (annual reports, proxy statements, etc.) or acceptedother communications for payment afterall stockholders who have consented or are deemed to have consented to receiving such communications in such manner in accordance with the Record Daterules promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). If you do not want to continue to receive combined mailings of Company incommunications and would prefer to receive separate mailings of Company communications, and you are a registered stockholder, please contact the tender offer.Company’s transfer agent, DST Systems, Inc. by phone at(877) 628-8575 or by mail to FS KKR Capital Corp. II, c/o DST Systems, Inc., 430 W. 7th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64105-1594. If you are a beneficial stockholder, you may contact the broker or bank where you hold the account to discontinue combined mailings of Company communications.

How many votes do I have?

Each Share held by a holder of record as of the Record Date has one vote on each matter considered at the Special Meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof.

4


How do I vote?Voting

You may vote in person at the SpecialAnnual Meeting in person or by proxy in accordance with the instructions provided below. You may also authorize a proxy by telephone or through the Internet using the toll-free telephone number or web address printed on your proxy card. Authorizing a proxy by telephone or through the Internet requires you to input the control number located on your proxy card. After inputting the control number, you will be prompted to direct your proxy to vote on each proposal. You will have an opportunity to review your directions and make any necessary changes before submitting your directions and terminating the telephone call or Internet link. Stockholders of the Company are entitled to one vote for each Share held.

When voting by proxy and mailing your proxy card, you are required to:

 

By Internet: www.proxyvote.com

indicate your instructions on the proxy card;

 

By telephone: (800)690-6903

date and sign the proxy card;

 

By mail: You may vote by proxy by indicating your instructions on the enclosed proxy card, dating and signing the proxy card, and promptly returning the proxy card in the envelope provided, which requires no postage if mailed in the United States. Please allow sufficient time for your proxy card to be received on or prior to [●] [a.m.] [p.m.], Eastern Time, on [●], 2018.

In person: You may vote in person at the Special Meeting by a requesting a ballot when you arrive. You will need to bring photo identification in order to be admitted to the Special Meeting. To obtain directions to the Special Meeting, please call the Company at (844)358-7276 and select Option 1.

What if a stockholder does not specify a choice for a matter when authorizing a proxy?

All properly executed proxies representing Shares received prior to the Special Meeting will be voted in accordance with the instructions marked thereon. If a proxy card is signedpromptly in the envelope provided, which requires no postage if mailed in the United States; and returned without any instructions marked,

allow sufficient time for the Shares willproxy card to be voted “FOR”received on or before 1:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on [●], 2020.

The Company’s proxy statement and the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Proposal and “FOR” the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal.

How can I change my vote or revoke a proxy?

You may revoke your proxy and change your vote before the proxiescard are votedavailable at the Special Meeting. www.proxyvote.com. If you have executed a proxy, you may revoke it with respect to any proposal byplan on attending the SpecialAnnual Meeting and voting your Shares in person, or by submitting a letter of revocation or a later-dated proxyyou will need to bring photo identification in order to be admitted to the Company at the following address prior to the date of the Special Meeting: FS Investment Corporation II, 201 Rouse Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19112, Attention: Stephen S. Sypherd, Secretary.

Annual Meeting. If myyour Shares are held through a broker and you attend the Annual Meeting in person, please bring a broker-controlled account by my broker, will my broker vote my Shares for me?

No. You should follow the instructions provided byletter from your broker on your voting instruction form. It is important to note that your broker will vote your Shares only ifidentifying you provide instructions on how you would like your Shares to be voted at the Special Meeting.

What constitutes a “quorum”?

Under the Company’s Articles of Amendment and Restatement and Third Amended and Restated Bylaws,one-third of the number of Shares entitled to be cast, present in person or by proxy, constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business.

Abstentions will be treated as Shares that are present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum for transacting business at the Special Meeting.

A “brokernon-vote” with respect to a matter occurs when a broker, bank or other institution or nominee holding shares on behalf of a beneficial owner and present (in person or by proxy) at a meeting for purposes of

5


voting on a routine proposal (or anon-routine proposal for which it has received instructions from the beneficial owner) has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares on a particular proposalShares and does not have, or chooses not to exercise, discretionary authorityauthorizing you to vote the shares on such proposal. If a beneficial owner does not instruct its broker, bank or other institution or nominee holding itsyour Shares on its behalf with respect to either the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Proposal or the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal, the Shares will not be treated as present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum for transacting business at the SpecialAnnual Meeting. If a beneficial owner instructs its broker, bank or other institution or nominee holding its Shares on its behalf with respect to one or both of the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Proposal or the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal, the Shares will be treated as present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum for transacting business at the Special Meeting.

In the event that a quorum is not present at the Special Meeting, the chairman of the Special Meeting shall have the power to adjourn the Special Meeting from time to time to a date not more than 120 days after the Record Date originally fixed for the Special Meeting without notice, other than the announcement at the Special Meeting, to permit further solicitation of proxies. Any business that might have been transacted at the Special Meeting originally called may be transacted at any such adjourned session(s) at which a quorum is present.Other Information Regarding This Solicitation

If it appears that there are not enough votes to approve any proposal at the Special Meeting, the chairman of the Special Meeting may adjourn the Special Meeting from time to time to a date not more than 120 days after the Record Date originally fixed for the Special Meeting without notice, other than announcement at the Special Meeting, to permit further solicitation of proxies.

If sufficient votes in favor of one proposal have been received by the time of the Special Meeting, such proposal will be acted upon and such actions will be final, regardless of any subsequent adjournments to consider the other proposal.

What vote is required to approve the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements and the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement?

The affirmative vote by the stockholders of the Company holding a majority of the outstanding voting securities is necessary for approval of each InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement and the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement. The 1940 Act, defines “a majority of outstanding voting securities” of the Company as the lesser of: (1) 67% or more of the voting securities present at the Special Meeting if the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of the Company are present or represented by proxy; or (2) more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of the Company. Abstentions and brokernon-votes (with respect to any proposal for which a beneficial owner does not instruct its broker, bank or other institution or nominee holding its Shares on its behalf) will not count as affirmative votes cast and will therefore have the same effect as votes against each of the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Proposal and the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal.

How will the final voting results be announced?

Preliminary voting results will be announced at the Special Meeting. Final voting results will be published in a current report on Form8-K within four business days after the date of the Special Meeting.

Will you incur expenses in soliciting proxies?

FSIC II Advisor and KKR Credit will bear the expense of the solicitation of proxies for the SpecialAnnual Meeting, including the cost of preparing, printing and mailing this proxy statement, the accompanying Notice of SpecialAnnual Meeting of

3


Stockholders and the proxy card. FSIC II Advisor has retained Broadridge Investor Communication Solutions, Inc. to assist in the solicitation of proxies for an estimated fee of approximately $265,000, plusout-of-pocket expenses.

6


The Company has requested that brokers, nominees, fiduciaries and other persons holding Shares in their names, or in the name of their nominees, which are beneficially owned by others, forward the proxy materials to, and obtain proxies from, such beneficial owners. FSIC II Advisor and KKR CreditThe Company will reimburse such persons for their reasonable expenses in so doing.

In addition to the solicitation of proxies by mail, proxies may be solicited in person and by telephone or facsimile transmission by directors, officers or regular employees of the Company and its affiliates (without special compensation therefor), as applicable.

. The Company has also retained Broadridge Investor Communication Solutions, Inc. to assist in the solicitation of proxies for an estimated fee of approximately $250,000, plusWhat does it mean if I receive more than oneout-of-pocket expenses. Any proxy card?

Some of your Sharesgiven pursuant to this solicitation may be registered differently or heldrevoked by notice from the person giving the proxy at any time before it is exercised. Any such notice of revocation should be provided in a different account. You should authorize a proxy to votewriting and signed by the Shares in each of your accounts by mail, by telephone or via the Internet. If you mail proxy cards, please sign, date and return each proxy card to guarantee that all of your Shares are voted. If you hold your Shares in registered form and wish to combine your stockholder accounts in the future, you should call the Company at (877)628-8575. Combining accounts reduces excess printing and mailing costs, resulting in cost savings to us that benefit yousame manner as a stockholder.

Are the proxy materials available electronically?

In accordance with regulations promulgated by the SEC, the Company has made this proxy statement, the Notice of Special Meeting of Stockholdersbeing revoked and the proxy card availabledelivered to stockholders on the Internet. Stockholders may (i) access and review the Company’s proxy materials, (ii) authorize their proxies,tabulator.

Annual Reports

The Company will furnish to its stockholders, free of charge, a copy of its most recent annual and quarterly reports upon request to FS KKR Capital Corp. II, Attn: Investor Relations, 201 Rouse Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19112.

4


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

The following table sets forth, as described in “How do I Vote,” and/or (iii) elect to receive future proxy materials by electronic delivery, viaof the Internet address provided below.

This proxy statement,Record Date, the Noticebeneficial ownership of Special Meeting of Stockholders and the proxy card are available at www.proxyvote.com.

PursuantCompany’s current directors, executive officers, each person known to the rules adopted by the SEC, the Company furnishes proxy materials by email to those stockholders who have elected to receive their proxy materials electronically. While the Company encourages stockholders to take advantage of electronic delivery of proxy materials, which helps to reduce the environmental impact of special meetings and the cost associated with the physical printing and mailing of materials, stockholders who have elected to receive proxy materials electronically by email, as well as beneficial owners of Shares held by a brokerbeneficially own 5% or custodian, may request a printed set of proxy materials.

Will my vote make a difference?

Yes. Your vote is needed to ensure the proposals can be acted upon. Your vote is very important. Your immediate response will help avoid potential delays and may save significant additional expenses associated with soliciting stockholder votes.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This proxy statement may contain certain “forward-looking” statements as that term is defined in Section 27Amore of the Securities Actoutstanding Shares, and all of 1933,the Company’s executive officers and directors as amended, and Section 21E ofa group.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance withRule 13d-3 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), including statements and includes voting or investment power with regardrespect to future eventsthe Shares. There are no Shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or the future performanceexercisable within 60 days of February 20, 2020. Ownership information for those persons who beneficially own 5% or financial conditionmore of the Company. The forward-looking statements contained in this proxy statement may include statements as to:Shares is based upon information furnished by the Company’s transfer agent and other information provided by such persons, if available.

 

the Company’s future operating results;

Shares Beneficially Owned as of
February 20, 2020

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1)

Number of
Shares
Percentage
(%)(2)

Interested Directors

Michael C. Forman(3)

319,488*

Todd Builione

—  —  

Independent Directors

Barbara Adams(4)

10,928*

Brian R. Ford

3,268*

Richard Goldstein

31,528*

Michael J. Hagan

22,222*

Jeffrey K. Harrow

38,214*

Jerel A. Hopkins

11,868*

James H. Kropp(5)

15,369*

Osagie Imasogie

—  —  

Elizabeth Sandler

—  —  

Executive Officers

Brian Gerson

—  —  

Daniel Pietrzak

—  —  

Steven Lilly

—  —  

Stephen S. Sypherd(6)

12,118*

William Goebel

8,873*

James F. Volk

—  —  

All directors and executive officers as a group (17 persons)

473,876*

 

the Company’s business prospects and the prospects of the companies in which the Company may invest;

 *

Less than one percent.

(1)

The address of each of the beneficial owners set forth above is c/o FS KKR Capital Corp. II, 201 Rouse Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19112.

(2)

Based on a total of 678,379,301 Shares issued and outstanding on February 20, 2020.

(3)

316,075 Shares held by MCFDA SCV LLC, which is a wholly-owned special purpose financing vehicle of which The 2011 Forman Investment Trust is a member and Mr. Forman is the manager. 3,412 Shares held by Franklin Square Holdings, L.P.

(4)

3,808 Shares held in an Individual Retirement Account.

(5)

All Shares held in an Individual Retirement Account

(6)

All Shares held in a joint account with spouse.

 

75


The following table sets forth, as of February 20, 2020, the impact of the investments that the Company expects to make;

the abilitydollar range of the Company’s portfolio companies to achieve their objectives;

the Company’s current and expected financing arrangements and investments;

changes in the general interest rate environment;

the adequacyequity securities that are beneficially owned by each member of the Company’s cash resources, financing sources and working capital;Board.

 

the timing and amount of cash flows, distributions and dividends, if any, from the Company’s portfolio companies;

Name of Director

Dollar Range of
Equity Securities
Beneficially
Owned(1)(2)(3)

Interested Directors:

Michael C. Forman

Over $100,000

Todd Builione

None

Independent Directors:

Barbara Adams

$50,001-$100,000

Brian R. Ford

$10,001-$50,000

Richard Goldstein

Over $100,000

Michael J. Hagan

Over $100,000

Jeffrey K. Harrow

Over $100,000

Jerel A. Hopkins

$50,001-$100,000

James H. Kropp

Over $100,000

Osagie Imasogie

None

Elizabeth Sandler

None

 

the Company’s contractual arrangements and relationships with third parties;

(1)

Beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with Rule16a-1(a)(2) promulgated under the Exchange Act.

(2)

The dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned by the Company’s directors is calculated in accordance with the applicable account statement rules of The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.

(3)

The dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned are: None,$1-$10,000,$10,001-$50,000,$50,001-$100,000 or over $100,000.

 

6


actual and potential conflicts of interest withPROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTOR NOMINEES

Pursuant to the FS Advisor Entities, KKR Credit, the Joint Advisor, FS Investment Advisor, LLC, FS Global Advisor, LLC, FS Energy Advisor, LLC, FS Fund Advisor, LLC, FS Credit Income Advisor, LLC, FSIC, FSIC III, FSIC IV, FS Energy and Power Fund, FS Global Credit Opportunities Fund, GDFM, FS Energy Total Return Fund, FS Credit Income Fund, FS Series Trust or any of their respective affiliates;

the dependencebylaws of the Company’s future successCompany, the number of directors on the general economy and its effect on the industries in which the CompanyBoard may invest;

the Company’s use of financial leverage;

the Company’s ability to maintain its qualification as a regulated investment company and as a BDC;

the impact on the Company’s business of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, as amended, and the rules and regulations issued thereunder;

the ability of FSIC II Advisor, KKR Credit and the Joint Advisor to locate suitable investments for the Company and to monitor and administer the Company’s investments;

the ability of FSIC II Advisor, KKR Credit and the Joint Advisor to attract and retain highly talented professionals;

the effect of changes to tax legislation and the Company’s tax position; and

the tax status of the enterprises in which the Company may invest.

In addition, words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect” and “intend” indicate a forward-looking statement, although not all forward-looking statements include these words. The forward-looking statements contained in this proxy statement involve risks and uncertainties. The Company’s actual results could differ materially from those implied or expressed in the forward-looking statements for any reason, including the factors set forth in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. Other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include:

changes in the economy;

risks associated with possible disruption in the Company’s operations or the economy generally due to terrorism or natural disasters;

future changes in laws or regulations and conditions in the Company’s operating areas;

failure to obtain requisite shareholder approval for the proposals set forth in this proxy statement; and

failure to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Master Transaction Agreement (as defined below).

The Company has based the forward-looking statements included in this proxy statement on information available to the Company as of the date of this proxy statement. Exceptbe fewer than one, as required by the federal securities laws,Maryland General Corporation Law, or greater than twelve. The Board is currently comprised of 11 directors, each of whom will hold office for the term to which he or she was elected and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified.

The directors of the Company undertakes no obligationare divided into three classes, designated Class A, Class B and Class C. Each class of directors holds office for a three-year term. The current Class A directors hold office for a term expiring at the 2021 annual meeting. The current Class B directors hold office for a term expiring at the 2022 annual meeting. The current Class C directors hold office for a term expiring at the Annual Meeting.

At the Annual Meeting, stockholders of the Company are being asked to revise or update any forward-looking statements, whetherconsider the election of Michael C. Forman, Richard Goldstein, James H. Kropp and Elizabeth Sandler as Class C directors. Each of Ms. Sandler and Messrs. Forman, Goldstein and Kropp have been nominated forre-election for a three-year term expiring at the 2023 annual meeting of the stockholders. Each director nominee has agreed to serve as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Shareholders are advised to consult any additional disclosures that the Company may make directly to shareholders or through reports that the Company may file in the future with the SEC, including annual reports on Formdirector if10-K, quarterly reports on Form10-Qre-elected and current reports on Form8-K.

8


PROPOSAL 1: APPROVAL OF INVESTMENTCO-ADVISORY AGREEMENTS PROPOSAL

Background

The Company currently receives investment advisory and administrative services from FSIC II Advisorhas consented to being named as a nominee. No person being nominated as a director is being proposed for election pursuant to any agreement or understanding between such person and the Current Investment Advisory Agreement. GDFM actsCompany.

A stockholder can vote for, or withhold his or her vote from, any or all of the director nominees. In the absence of instructions to the contrary, it is the intention of the persons named as proxies to vote such proxyFOR the election of each of the director nominees named above. If any of the director nominees should decline or be unable to serve as a director, the persons named as proxies will vote for such other nominee as may be proposed by the Board’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Board has no reason to believe that any of the persons named as director nominees will be unable or unwilling to serve.

Information about the Board and Director Nominees

The role of the Board is to provide general oversight of the Company’s business affairs and to exercise all of the Company’s powers except those reserved for the stockholders. The responsibilities of the Board also include, among other things, the oversight of the Company’s investmentsub-adviser pursuant to activities, the Current InvestmentSub-Advisory Agreement. As the Company announced on December 11, 2017, GDFM intends to resign as the investmentsub-adviser to the Company and terminate the Current InvestmentSub-Advisory Agreement on the GDFM End Date. The Company desires to enter into a new investment advisory relationship with KKR Credit. Accordingly, the FS Advisor Entities and KKR Credit and certain other parties have entered into a master transaction agreement (the “Master Transaction Agreement”) setting out the termsquarterly valuation of the relationship between FSIC II AdvisorCompany’s assets, oversight of the Company’s financing arrangements and KKR Credit whereby FSIC II Advisor and KKR Credit would provide certain advisory and administrative services to the Company pursuant to the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements. In addition, the FS Advisor Entities and KKR Credit agreed to form the Joint Advisor for the purpose of advising and providing administrative services to the Company pursuant to the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement.corporate governance activities.

To effectuate the proposed investment advisory relationships with KKR Credit, the Company is seeking stockholder approval to enter into the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements and the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement, each of which would replace the Current Investment Advisory Agreement and the Current InvestmentSub-Advisory Agreement as described herein.

The Board, including aA majority of the members of the Board who are not parties to the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements or the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement, or “interested persons,” as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act, of the Company or FS/KKR Advisor, LLC, the Company’s investment adviser (the “Independent Directors”“Advisor”), and are “independent” as defined by Rule 303A.00 in the NYSE Listed Company Manual. These individuals are referred to as the Company’s independent directors. Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act defines an “interested person” to include, among other things, any person who has, or within the last two years had, a material business or professional relationship with the Company. The members of the Board who are not independent directors are referred to as interested directors. The Board is currently comprised of 11 directors, nine of whom are independent directors. The Board has determined that the following directors are independent directors: Messrs. Ford, Goldstein, Hagan, Harrow, Hopkins, Kropp, Imasogie and Mmes. Adams and Sandler. Based upon information requested from each director and director nominee concerning his or her background, employment and affiliations, the Board has affirmatively determined that none of the independent directors has, or within the last two years had, a material business or professional relationship with the Company, other than in his or her capacity as a member of the Board or any Board committee or as a stockholder.

In considering each director and the composition of the Board as a whole, the Board seeks a diverse group of experiences, characteristics, attributes and skills, including diversity in gender, ethnicity and race that the Board believes enables a director to make a significant contribution to the Board, the Company and its stockholders. These experiences, characteristics, attributes and skills, which are more fully described below, include, but are not limited to, management experience, independence, financial expertise and experience serving as directors or trustees of other entities. The Board may also consider such party unanimously approvedother experiences, characteristics, attributes and skills as it deems appropriate, given the then-current needs of the Board and the Company.

7


These experiences, characteristics, attributes and skills relate directly to the management and operations of the Company. Success in each of these categories is a key factor in the InvestmentCo-Advisory AgreementsCompany’s overall operational success and creating stockholder value. The Company believes that directors and director nominees who possess these experiences, characteristics, attributes and skills are better able to provide oversight of the Company’s management and the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement,Company’s long-term and has deemed entry intostrategic objectives. Below is a description of the experience, characteristics, attributes and skills of each director that led the Board to conclude that each such agreementsperson should serve as a director. The Board also considered the specific experience described in each director’s biographical information, as disclosed below.

The following tables set forth certain information regarding the director nominees and the Company’s other independent directors and interested directors. “Fund Complex” means the Company and FS KKR Capital Corp. (“FSK”), together.

8


Nominees for Class C Directors—New Term to Expire in 2023

Name, Address, Age

and Position(s)

with Company(1)

Term of Office

and Length of

Time Served(2)

Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years

Number of

Companies in

Fund Complex

Overseen by

Director

Other Public

Directorships

Held by Director

During the Past

Five Years†

Michael C. Forman(3)

Age: 58

Chairman of the

Board and Chief

Executive Officer

Class C Director; Term expires in 2020;

Director since 2011

Michael C. Forman is chairman and chief executive officer of Franklin Square Holdings, L.P. (“FS Investments”) and has been leading the Company since its founding. He has served as the chairman and chief executive officer of the Advisor since its inception. Prior to founding FS Investments, Mr. Forman founded a private equity and real estate investment firm. He started his career as an attorney in the Corporate and Securities Department at the Philadelphia based law firm of Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP (“Klehr Harrison”). In addition to his career as an attorney and investor, Mr. Forman has been an active entrepreneur and has founded several companies, including companies engaged in the gaming, specialty finance and asset management industries. Mr. Forman is a member of a number of civic and charitable boards, including The Franklin Institute, Drexel University and the Philadelphia Center City District Foundation. He is also Chairman of Vetri Community Partnership. Mr. Forman received his B.A., summa cum laude, from the University of Rhode Island, where he was elected Phi Beta Kappa, and received his J.D. from Rutgers University. Mr. Forman has extensive experience in corporate and securities law and has founded and served in a leadership role of various companies, including the Advisor. Mr. Forman’s experience and his positions as the Company’s and the Advisor’s chief executive officer make him a significant asset to the Company.TwoFS Energy and Power Fund; FS Global Credit Opportunities Fund; FS Credit Real Estate Income Trust; FS Credit Income Fund; FS Energy Total Return Fund; FS Series Trust; FS Multi-Alternative Income Fund

Richard Goldstein

Age: 58

Director

Class C Director; Term expires in 2020; Director since 2015

Richard I. Goldstein is a managing director of Liberty Associated Partners, LP (“LAP”) since 2000 and Associated Partners, LP (“AP”) since 2006, both investment funds that make private and public market investments in communications, media, Internet and energy companies. Prior to joining LAP and AP, Mr. Goldstein was vice president of The Associated Group, Inc. (“AGI”), a multi-billion dollar publicly traded owner and operator of communications-related businesses and assets. While at AGI, he assisted in establishing Teligent, Inc., of which he was a director, and was responsible for operating AGI’s cellular telephone operations. Mr. Goldstein is currently a member of the board of directors of Ubicquia LLC and has counseled many early stage companies.

Mr. Goldstein received a Bachelor of Science in Business and Economics from Carnegie Mellon University and received training at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Management Information Systems.

Mr. Goldstein has extensive experience as a senior executive and in negotiating investment transactions in a variety of industries. This experience has provided Mr. Goldstein, in the opinion of the Board, with experience and insight which is beneficial to the Company.

TwoFS Energy and Power Fund

9


Nominees for Class C Directors—New Term to Expire in 2023

Name, Address, Age

and Position(s)

with Company(1)

Term of Office

and Length of

Time Served(2)

Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years

Number of

Companies in

Fund Complex

Overseen by

Director

Other Public

Directorships

Held by Director

During the Past

Five Years†

James H. Kropp

Age: 70

Director

Class C Director; Term expires in 2020;

Director since

2018

James H. Kropp served as an independent director of Corporate Capital Trust, Inc. (“CCT”) from 2011 until the merger of FSK and CCT and as an independent trustee for Corporate Capital Trust II (“CCT II”) from 2015 until its merger with the Company. Mr. Kropp currently serves as Chief Investment Officer of SLKW Investments LLC, successor to i3 Funds, LLC, a position he has held since 2009 and was Chief Financial Officer of Microproperties LLC from 2012 to March 2019. Since 1998, Mr. Kropp has been a director and member of the Nominating/Corporate Governance committee of PS Business Parks, Inc., a public real estate investment trust whose shares are listed on the NYSE. Mr. Kropp became an Independent Trustee of NYSE-listed American Homes 4 Rent and Chairman of its Audit Committee at its founding in November 2012. Mr. Kropp received a B.B.A. Finance from St. Francis College and completed the MBA/CPA preparation program from New York University. Mr. Kropp has, in the past, been licensed to serve in a variety of supervisory positions (including financial, options and compliance principal) by the National Association of Securities Dealers. He is a member of the American Institute of CPAs and a Board Leadership Fellow for the National Association of Corporate Directors.

The Board believes Mr. Kropp’s direct experience with investments as a portfolio manager and registered investment adviser, together with his accounting, auditing and finance experience, is valuable to the Company.

TwoNone

Elizabeth Sandler

Age: 49

Director

Class C Director; Term expires in 2020; Director since 2019

Elizabeth Sandler is the founder and has served as the chief executive officer of Echo Juliette, a consultant and adviser on workplace investments spanning executive coaching, employee productivity and physical space, since January 2019. Prior to founding Echo Juliette, Ms. Sandler served as managing director of The Blackstone Group and Chief Operating Officer of its Blackstone Real Estate Debt Strategies business from September 2016 to August 2018. Prior to joining The Blackstone Group, she worked at Deutsche Bank from November 2000 to August 2016, including serving at different times as a managing director and global chief operating officer of the Risk Division, Structure Finance business and Commercial Real Estate business, among other roles. Prior to joining Deutsche Bank, she worked at a number of companies in the financial services industry. Ms. Sandler received a B.A. from Duke University and an M.B.A. from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

Ms. Sandler’s extensive experience in the financial services industry has provided Ms. Sandler, in the opinion of the Board, with experience and insight which is beneficial to the Company.

TwoNone

10


INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS

(other than Nominees for Class C Directors)

Name, Address, Age

and Position(s)

with Company(1)

Term of Office

and Length of

Time Served(2)

Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years

Number of

Companies in

Fund Complex

Overseen by

Director

Other Public

Directorships

Held by Director

During the Past

Five Years†

Barbara Adams

Age: 68

Director

Class A Director; Term expires in 2021; Director since 2012

Barbara Adams served as the executive vice president—legal affairs and general counsel of the Philadelphia Housing Authority from August 2011 to April 2016, and as a trustee of each of the Philadelphia Housing Authority Retirement Income Trust and the Philadelphia Housing Authority Defined Contribution Pension Plan from November 2011 to April 2016. She served as the general counsel of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (the “Commonwealth”) from 2005 until January 2011. As general counsel to the Commonwealth, Ms. Adams led a staff of more than 500 lawyers in representing then Pennsylvania Governor Edward G. Rendell and more than 30 executive and independent agencies and commissions in litigation, transactions, regulatory, legislative and criminal justice matters. Prior to her appointment as general counsel to the Commonwealth, Ms. Adams was a partner at the law firm of Duane Morris LLP in Philadelphia, focusing her practice on taxable andtax-exempt public finance, affordable housing development matters, state and local government law, energy law and campaign finance law. Ms. Adams previously served as the policy committeeco-chair on housing, in then Governor-elect Edward G. Rendell’s transition team. She is a charter member of the Forum on Affordable Housing and Community Development Law of the American Bar Association, a former member of the National Association of Bond Lawyers, and a member of the Pennsylvania Association of Bond Lawyers and of the American, Pennsylvania and Philadelphia Bar Associations.

She is a past member of the board and secretary of Philadelphia Neighborhood Enterprise, a nonprofit corporation affiliated with The Enterprise Foundation, a past member of the board and treasurer of the Reading Terminal Market, and a past member of the respective boards of the Pennsylvania Association of Bond Lawyers, the Philadelphia Association of Community Development Corporations and the People’s Emergency Center in Philadelphia. Ms. Adams has served on a number of other charitable and public organizations, including a term as commissioner of the Philadelphia Gas Commission, as an advisory board member on the Homeless Advocacy Project of the Philadelphia Bar Association, as a commissioner and secretary of the Independent Charter Commission of the City of Philadelphia and as an advisory board member of The Nuclear World Project. Ms. Adams previously served on the housing policy committees of the respective transition teams of both then Pennsylvania Governor-elect Edward G. Rendell and then Pennsylvania Governor-elect Tom Wolf. Ms. Adams is a graduate of Temple University School of Law and a graduate of Smith College.

The Board believes that Ms. Adams’ extensive service in the private and public sectors provides her with experience that would be beneficial to the Company.

TwoNone

11


INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS

(other than Nominees for Class C Directors)

Name, Address, Age

and Position(s)

with Company(1)

Term of Office

and Length of

Time Served(2)

Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years

Number of

Companies in

Fund Complex

Overseen by

Director

Other Public

Directorships

Held by Director

During the Past

Five Years†

Brian R. Ford

Age: 71

Director

Class A Director; Term expires in 2021; Director since 2013

Brian R. Ford retired as a partner of Ernst & Young LLP, a multinational professional services firm, in July 2008, where he was employed since 1971. Mr. Ford currently serves on the board of Clearway Energy, Inc. and AmeriGas Propane, Inc. Mr. Ford was previously the chief executive officer of Washington Philadelphia Partners, LP, a real estate investment company, from July 2008 to April 2010. He also serves on the boards of Drexel University and Drexel University College of Medicine since March 2004 and March 2009, respectively. Mr. Ford received his B.S. in Economics from Rutgers University. He is a Certified Public Accountant.

Mr. Ford’s extensive financial accounting experience and service on the boards of public companies, in the opinion of the Board, provides him with insight which is beneficial to the Company.

TwoGulfMark Offshore, Inc. Clearway Energy, Inc.; AmeriGas Propane, Inc.; FS Energy Total Return Fund; FS Credit Income Fund; FS Multi-Alternative Income Fund

12


INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS

(other than Nominees for Class C Directors)

Name, Address, Age

and Position(s)

with Company(1)

Term of Office

and Length of

Time Served(2)

Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years

Number of

Companies in

Fund Complex

Overseen by

Director

Other Public

Directorships

Held by Director

During the Past

Five Years†

Michael J. Hagan

Age: 57

Director and Lead Independent Director

Class B Director; Term expires in 2022; Director since 2018

Michael J. Hagan is aco-founder of Hawk Capital Partners, a private equity firm, where he currently serves as managing partner, and has served in such capacity since December 2014. Prior toco-founding Hawk Capital Partners, Mr. Hagan previously served as the President of LifeShield, Inc. (“LifeShield”) from June 2013 to May 2014, a leading wireless home security company which was acquired by and became a division of DirecTV in 2013. He previously served as the chairman, president and chief executive officer of LifeShield from December 2009 to May 2013. In May 2017, he became a director and majority owner of LifeShield, which he then sold in February 2019 to ADT. Prior to his employment by LifeShield, Mr. Hagan served as chairman of NutriSystem, Inc. (“NutriSystem”) from 2002 to November 2008, as chief executive officer of NutriSystem from 2002 to May 2008 and as president of NutriSystem from July 2006 to September 2007. Prior to joining NutriSystem, Mr. Hagan was theco-founder of Verticalnet Inc. (“Verticalnet”) and held a number of executive positions at Verticalnet since its founding in 1995, including chairman of the board from 2002 to 2005, president and chief executive officer from 2001 to 2002, executive vice president and chief operating officer from 2000 to 2001 and senior vice president prior to that time. Mr. Hagan served on the board of directors of NutriSystem from February 2012 to March 2019. Mr. Hagan previously served as a director of NutriSystem from 2002 to November 2008, Verticalnet from 1995 to January 2008 and Actua Corporation (formerly known as ICG Group, Inc.) from June 2007 to February 2018. Mr. Hagan also served as a member of the board of trustees of American Financial Realty Trust from 2003 to June 2007. Mr. Hagan holds a B.S. in Accounting from Saint Joseph’s University, where he currently serves as a Trustee. He is also a Certified Public Accountant (inactive).

Mr. Hagan has significant experience as an entrepreneur and senior executive at public and private organizations. Mr. Hagan also has extensive experience in corporate finance, private equity, financial reporting and accounting and controls. This experience has provided Mr. Hagan, in the opinion of the Board, with experience and insight which is beneficial to the Company.

TwoActua, Inc.

13


INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS

(other than Nominees for Class C Directors)

Name, Address, Age

and Position(s)

with Company(1)

Term of Office

and Length of

Time Served(2)

Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years

Number of

Companies in

Fund Complex

Overseen by

Director

Other Public

Directorships

Held by Director

During the Past

Five Years†

Jeffrey K. Harrow

Age: 62

Director

Class A Director; Term expires in 2021;

Director since

2014

Jeffrey K. Harrow has been chairman of Sparks Marketing Group, Inc. (“Sparks”) since 2001. Mr. Harrow is responsible for both operating divisions of Sparks, which includes Sparks Custom Retail and Sparks Exhibits & Environments, with offices throughout the United States and China. Sparks’ clients include a number of Fortune 500 companies. Prior to joining Sparks, Mr. Harrow served as president and chief executive officer of CMPExpress.com from 1999 to 2000. Mr. Harrow created the strategy that allowed CMPExpress.com to move from aBusiness-to-Consumer marketplace into theBusiness-to-Business sector. In 2000, Mr. Harrow successfully negotiated the sale of CMPExpress.com to Cyberian Outpost (NASDAQ ticker: COOL). From 1982 through 1998, Mr. Harrow was the president, chief executive officer and a director of Travel One, a national travel management company. Mr. Harrow was responsible for growing the company from a single office location to more than 100 offices in over 40 cities and to its rank as the 6th largest travel management company in the United States. Under his sales strategy, annual revenues grew from $8 million to just under $1 billion. During this time, Mr. Harrow purchased nine travel companies in strategic cities to complement Travel One’s organic growth. In 1998, Mr. Harrow and his partners sold Travel One to American Express. Mr. Harrow’s past directorships include service as a director of Cherry Hill National Bank, Hickory Travel Systems, Marlton Technologies and the Dean’s Board of Advisors of The George Washington University School of Business. Mr. Harrow is a graduate of The George Washington University School of Government and Business Administration, where he received his B.B.A. in 1979.

Mr. Harrow has served in a senior executive capacity at various companies, as well as a member of various boards. His extensive service at various companies has provided him, in the opinion of the Board, with experience and insight which is beneficial to the Company.

TwoNone

14


INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS

(other than Nominees for Class C Directors)

Name, Address, Age

and Position(s)

with Company(1)

Term of Office

and Length of

Time Served(2)

Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years

Number of

Companies in

Fund Complex

Overseen by

Director

Other Public

Directorships

Held by Director

During the Past

Five Years†

Jerel A. Hopkins

Age: 47

Director

Class B Director; Term expires in 2022; Director since 2013

Jerel A. Hopkins has served as Vice President and Associate General Counsel of Delaware Management Holdings, Inc., a diversified asset management firm and an affiliate of Macquarie, since November 2004. Prior to joining Delaware Management Holdings, Inc., Mr. Hopkins served as an attorney in the corporate and securities department of the law firm Klehr Harrison from January 2000 to November 2004. Mr. Hopkins served as counsel in the division of enforcement and litigation of the Pennsylvania Securities Commission from August 1997 to December 1999 and as lead counsel of the internet fraud unit from January 1999 to December 1999. In addition, Mr. Hopkins served as special counsel on behalf of the Pennsylvania Securities Commission to the North American Securities Administrators Association, Inc. from January 1999 to December 1999. Mr. Hopkins has also served on the board of trustees of the Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine since February 2012. Mr. Hopkins received his B.S. from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and his J.D. from Villanova University School of Law.

Mr. Hopkins has significant experience in corporate and securities law matters and has served as a member of a number of boards. This experience has provided Mr. Hopkins, in the opinion of the Board, with experience and insight which is beneficial to the Company.

TwoNone

15


INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS

(other than Nominees for Class C Directors)

Name, Address, Age

and Position(s)

with Company(1)

Term of Office

and Length of

Time Served(2)

Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years

Number of

Companies in

Fund Complex

Overseen by

Director

Other Public

Directorships

Held by Director

During the Past

Five Years†

Osagie Imasogie

Age: 58

Director

Class A Director; Term expires in 2021; Director since 2019

Osagie Imasogie has over 30 years of experience in the field of law, finance, business management, healthcare and the pharmaceutical industry. He is aco-founder and the Senior Managing Partner of PIPV Capital, a Private Equity Firm that is focused on the Life Sciences vertical. Prior toco-founding PIPV Capital, Mr. Imasogie conceptualized and established GlaxoSmithKline Ventures and was its founding Vice President. Mr. Imasogie has held senior commercial and R&D positions within pharmaceutical companies such as GSK, SmithKline, DuPont Merck and Endo, where he was the founding General Counsel and SVP for Corporate Development. Mr. Imasogie has also been a Price Waterhouse Corporate Finance Partner as well as a practicing attorney with a leading US law firm.

Mr. Imasogie is a serial entrepreneur and investor. He serves as Chairman and Founder of iLera Healthcare and was also the Founder and Chairman of Iroko Pharmaceuticals, Ception Therapeutics Inc. and Trigenesis Therapeutics Inc. In addition, he serves on the Board of a number of financial institutions such as Haverford Trust and StoneRidge Investment. Mr. Imasogie is a Trustee of the University of Pennsylvania and also a member of the Board of Overseers of the University of Pennsylvania Law School, where he is an Adjunct Professor of Law. Mr. Imasogie also serves on the Board of the Philadelphia Orchestra and the Philadelphia Museum of Art. Mr. Imasogie holds post-graduate degrees from the University of Pennsylvania Law School and the London School of Economics.

Mr. Imasogie has served in a senior executive capacity at various companies, as well as a member of various boards. His extensive service at various companies has provided him, in the opinion of the Board, with insight which is beneficial to the Company.

TwoNone

16


INTERESTED DIRECTORS

(other than Nominees for Class C Directors)

Name, Address, Age
and Position(s)

with Company(1)

Term of Office
and Length of
Time Served(2)
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five YearsNumber of
Companies in
Fund Complex
Overseen by
Director

Other Public
Directorships

Held by Director
During the Past

Five Years†

Todd C. Builione(3)

Age: 45

President and Director

Class B Director; Term expires in 2022; Director since 2018

Todd C. Builione serves as the Advisor’s president and, from 2018 through October 2019, served as the Company’s president. Mr. Builione joined KKR Credit Advisors US (LLC) (“KKR Credit”) in 2013 and is a member of KKR Credit and president of KKR Credit and Markets. Mr. Builione also serves on KKR Credit’s Investment Management and Distribution Committee and its Risk and Operations Committee. Prior to joining KKR Credit, Mr. Builione spent nine years at Highbridge Capital Management, serving as president of the firm, chief executive officer of Highbridge’s Hedge Fund business and a member of the Investment and Risk Committees. Mr. Builione began his career at the Goldman Sachs Group, where he was predominantly focused on capital markets and mergers and acquisitions for financial institutions. He received a B.S., summa cum laude, Merrill Presidential Scholar, from Cornell University and a J.D., cum laude, from Harvard Law School. Mr. Builione serves on the board of directors of Marshall Wace, a liquid alternatives provider which formed a strategic partnership with KKR Credit in 2015. Mr. Builione also serves on the Advisory Council of Cornell University’s Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, and on the board of directors of the Pingry School.

Mr. Builione has extensive experience and familiarity with the markets in which the Company primarily invests, along with significant knowledge and prior experience in the management of large businesses in the areas the Company operates in, and portfolio risk management and analytics. The Board believes Mr. Builione’s experience and his position as the Advisor’s president makes him a significant asset to the Company.

TwoNone

Includes directorships held in (1) any investment company registered under the 1940 Act, (2) any company with a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act and (3) any company subject to the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, in each case, other than with respect to companies in the Fund Complex.

(1)

The address for each director is c/o FS KKR Capital Corp. II, 201 Rouse Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19112.

(2)

Directors serve until the expiration of their respective term and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified.

(3)

“Interested person” of the Company as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. Messrs. Forman and Builione are each an “interested person” because of their affiliation with the Advisor.

Risk Oversight and Board Structure

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

Through its direct oversight role, and indirectly through its committees, the Board performs a risk oversight function for the Company consisting of, among other things, the following activities: (1) at regular and special Board meetings, and on an ad hoc basis as needed, receiving and reviewing reports related to the performance and operations

17


of the Company; (2) reviewing and approving, as applicable, its compliance policies and procedures; (3) meeting with the portfolio management team to review investment strategies, techniques and the processes used to manage related risks; (4) overseeing the Company’s investment valuation process via its valuation committee that operates pursuant to authority assigned to it by the Board; (5) meeting, or reviewing reports prepared by the representatives of key service providers, including the Company’s investment adviser, administrator, custodian and independent registered public accounting firm, to review and discuss the Company’s activities and to provide direction with respect thereto; (6) reviewing periodically, and at least annually, the Company’s fidelity bond, directors and officers, and errors and omissions insurance policies and such other insurance policies as may be inappropriate; (7) overseeing the best interestsCompany’s accounting and financial reporting processes, including supervision of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm to ensure that they provide timely analyses of significant financial reporting and internal control issues; and (8) overseeing the services of the Company’s chief compliance officer to test its compliance procedures and its service providers.

The Board also performs its risk oversight responsibilities with the assistance of the Company’s chief compliance officer. The Board receives a quarterly report from the Company’s chief compliance officer, who reports on, among other things, the Company’s compliance with applicable securities laws and its internal compliance policies and procedures. In addition, the Company’s chief compliance officer prepares a written report annually evaluating, among other things, the adequacy and effectiveness of the compliance policies and procedures of the Company and certain of its stockholders, as described in the sections entitled “Board Consideration” and “Factors Consideredservice providers. The Company’s chief compliance officer’s report, which is reviewed by the Board” in this Proposal 1Board, addresses at a minimum: (1) the operation and “Proposal 2: Approval of Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal.”

Concurrently with seeking stockholder approval of the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements and the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement, KKR Credit is seeking exemptive relief from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) that would permit the Company following the effectiveness of the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement toco-invest in privately negotiated investment transactions with certain accounts managed by KKR Credit (“Exemptive Relief”). There can be no assurance of the timing of the approval of the application or whether the requested Exemptive Relief will be granted.

If the stockholderscompliance policies and procedures of the Company approveand certain of its service providers since the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal, thenlast report; (2) any material changes to such policies and procedures since the Joint Advisorlast report; (3) any recommendations for changes to such policies and procedures as a result of the Company’s chief compliance officer’s annual review; and (4) any material compliance matters that have occurred since the date of the last report about which the Board would serve as investment adviserreasonably need to know to oversee the Company’s compliance activities and risks. The Company’s chief compliance officer also meets separately in executive session with the independent directors of the Company at least once each year. In addition to compliance reports from the Company’s chief compliance officer, the Board also receives reports and updates from legal counsel to the Company pursuant to the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement fromregarding legal, regulatory and after the Joint Advisor Effective Date.governance matters.

If the stockholdersBoard Composition and Leadership Structure

Mr. Forman, who is an “interested person” of the Company approve the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Proposal, FSIC II Advisor and KKR Credit would serve as investmentco-advisers to the Company pursuant to the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements from the Closing Date until the Joint Advisor Effective Date.

If the Joint Advisor Effective Date occurs on the same day as the Closing Date, then the Joint Advisor would serve as investment adviser to the Company pursuant to the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement and the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements would not become effective. If the Joint Advisor Effective Date occurs after the Closing Date, then FSIC II Advisor and KKR Credit would serve as investmentco-advisers to the Company pursuant to the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements from the Closing Date until the Joint Advisor Effective Date, and the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements would automatically terminate upon the effectiveness of the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement

Accordingly,defined in order for FSIC II Advisor and KKR Credit to serve as investmentco-advisers to the Company pursuant to the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements, the stockholders of the Company must approve

9


the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Proposal and the other conditions to the Closing Date must be satisfied or (to the extent permitted) waived, and in order for the Joint Advisor to serve as investment adviser to the Company pursuant to the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement, the stockholders of the Company must approve the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal, and the other conditions to the Joint Advisor Effective Date must be satisfied or (to the extent permitted) waived. Depending on the timing and sequencing of obtaining stockholder approval for the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Proposal and the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal, the Company may enter into an interim investment advisory agreement pursuant to Rule15a-4Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act, serves as both the chief executive officer of the Company and chairman of the Board. The Board believes that Mr. Forman, asco-founder and chief executive officer of the Company, is the director with KKR Credit.the most knowledge of the Company’s business strategy and is best situated to serve as chairman of the Board. The Company’s charter, as well as regulations governing business development companies (“BDCs”) generally, requires that a majority of the Board be persons other than “interested persons” of the Company, as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act.

IfWhile the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements are in effect andCompany currently does not have a policy mandating a lead independent director, the conditions to entry intoBoard believes that having an independent director fill the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement are met thereafter or, if applicable, waived, the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements will terminate and the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement will become effective.

lead director role is appropriate. Mr. Hagan currently serves as lead independent director. The FS Advisor Entities and KKR Credit have entered into a sourcing and administrative services agreement, pursuant to which,lead independent director, among other things, KKR Credit will provide certain administrative services toworks with the FS Advisor Entities, and KKR Credit’s broker-dealer affiliate provides certain sourcing and other services to the FS Advisor Entities. The sourcing and administrative services agreement shall terminate with respect to FSIC II Advisor on the effective datechairman of the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Board in the preparation of the agenda for each Board meeting and in determining the need for meetings of the Board, chairs any meeting of the independent directors in executive session, facilitates communications between other members of the Board and the chairman of the Board and/or the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement. In addition,chief executive officer and otherwise consults with the Company’schairman of the Board and/or the chief executive officer on matters relating to corporate governance and Board performance.

The Board has concluded that its structure is appropriate given the current expense supportsize and conditional reimbursement agreement, dated May 10, 2012 and amended and restated ascomplexity of May 16, 2013, by and between the Company and FS Investments will terminate upon the effectivenessextensive regulation to which the Company is subject as a BDC.

18


Board Meetings and Attendance

On March 14, 2019, Joseph P. Ujobai resigned from the Board. On July 8, 2019, the Board appointed Osagie Imasogie as a new independent member of the Investment Co-Advisory Agreements,Board. On October 30, 2019, the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory AgreementBoard appointed Elizabeth Sandler as a new independent member of the Board. On November 26, 2019, Frederick Arnold resigned from the Board.

The Board met 14 times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, including four regular quarterly meetings. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, each director attended at least 75% of all meetings of the Board and Board committees on which he or any interim investment advisory agreement, whichever is first to occur.she served (held during the period that such director served). The Company does not have a formal policy regarding director attendance at an annual meeting of stockholders. None of the directors then in office attended the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders.

Committees of the Board of Directors

The InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements ProposalBoard has established three standing committees of the Board, which consist of an Audit Committee, a Valuation Committee and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Board has not established a standing compensation committee because the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal are not contingent on one another. However, if the stockholdersexecutive officers of the Company do not approve bothreceive any direct compensation from the InvestmentCompany. The Board, as a whole, participates in the consideration of director compensation and decisions on director compensation are based on, among other things, a review of data of comparable BDCs. The Board may also engage compensation consultants fromCo-Advisorytime-to-time, Agreements Proposalfollowing consideration of certain factors related to such consultants’ independence.

Audit Committee

The Board has established an Audit Committee that operates pursuant to a charter and consists of three members, including a Chairman of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee members are Messrs. Ford (Chairman), Kropp and Imasogie, all of whom are independent. The Board has determined that Messrs. Ford and Kropp are “audit committee financial experts” as defined by Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of RegulationS-K promulgated under the Exchange Act. The primary function of the Audit Committee is to oversee the integrity of the Company’s accounting policies, financial reporting process and system of internal controls regarding finance and accounting policies. The Audit Committee is responsible for selecting, engaging and discharging the Company’s independent accountants, reviewing the plans, scope and results of the audit engagement with the Company’s independent accountants, approving professional services provided by the Company’s independent accountants (including compensation therefor) and reviewing the independence of the Company’s independent accountants. The Audit Committee held 13 meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. The Audit Committee charter can be accessed via the Company’s website atwww.fsinvestments.com/support/articles/corporate-governance-fskii.

Valuation Committee

The Board has established a Valuation Committee that operates pursuant to a charter and the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal, thenauthority assigned to it by the Board willand consists of five members, including a Chairman of the Valuation Committee. The Valuation Committee members are Ms. Adams and Messrs. Kropp (Chairman), Hopkins, Goldstein and Imasogie, all of whom are independent. The primary function of the Valuation Committee is to establish guidelines and make recommendations to the Board on matters relating to the valuation of the Company’s investments. The Valuation Committee held seven meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Board has established a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee that operates pursuant to a charter and consists of three members, including a Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance

19


Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee members are Messrs. Harrow (Chairman), Hagan and Hopkins, all of whom are independent. The primary function of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is to consider and evaluatemake recommendations to the Board regarding certain governance matters, including selection of directors for election by stockholders, selection of director nominees to fill vacancies on the Board or a committee thereof, development and revision, as appropriate, of applicable corporate governance documentation and practices and oversight of the evaluation of the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held five meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.

When nominating director candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee takes into consideration such factors as it deems appropriate in accordance with its optionscharter. Among the qualifications considered in the selection of candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the following attributes and criteria of candidates: experience, including experience with investment companies and other organizations of comparable purpose, skills, expertise, diversity, including diversity of gender, race and national origin, personal and professional integrity, time availability in light of other commitments, conflicts of interest and such other relevant factors that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers appropriate in the context of the needs of the Board, including, when applicable, to determine what alternatives areenhance the ability of the Board or committees of the Board to fulfill their duties and/or to satisfy any independence or other applicable requirements imposed by law, rule, regulation or listing standard including, but not limited to, the 1940 Act and rules promulgated by the SEC. Each of the director nominees was approved by the members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the entire Board.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers candidates suggested by its members and other Board members, as well as the Company’s management and stockholders. A Company stockholder who wishes to recommend a prospective nominee for the Board must provide notice to the Secretary of the Company in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Company’s best interestsThird Amended and thatRestated Bylaws, which are described in greater detail under the heading “Submission of Stockholder Proposals.” Nominees for director who are recommended by stockholders will be evaluated in the same manner as any other nominee for director. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter can be accessed via the Company’s stockholders.website atwww.fsinvestments.com/support/articles/corporate-governance-fskii.

About FSICCommunications Between Interested Parties and the Board

The Board welcomes communications from interested parties. Interested parties may send communications to the Board or to any particular director to the following address: c/o FS KKR Capital Corp. II, Advisor

FSIC II Advisor is a Delaware limited liability company, located at 201 Rouse Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19112, registered as an investment adviser withPennsylvania 19112. Interested parties should indicate clearly the SEC underdirector or directors to whom the Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”). FSIC II Advisorcommunication is a subsidiarybeing sent so that each communication may be forwarded directly to the appropriate director(s).

20


Information about Executive Officers Who Are Not Directors

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the executive officers of the Company’s affiliate, FS Investments, a leading asset manager dedicated to helping individuals, financial professionals and institutions design better portfolios. FSIC II Advisor is led by substantially the same personnel as the senior management teamsCompany who are not directors of the investment advisers to certain other BDCs, open andclosed-end management investment companies and a real estate investment trust sponsored by FS Investments (the “FSNon-BDC Funds” and together with the BDCs, the “Fund Complex”).

Michael C. Forman, the Company’s chairman, president and chiefCompany. Each executive officer serves as the chairmanholds his office until his successor is chosen and chief executive officer of FSIC II Advisor. The Company’s executive vice president, Zachary Klehr, and vice president, treasurer and secretary, Stephen S. Sypherd, are both officers of FSIC II Advisor.

FSIC II Advisor’s senior management team has significant experience in private lending and private equity investing, and has developed an expertise in using all levels of a firm’s capital structure to produce income-generating investments, while focusing on risk management. The team also has extensive knowledge of the managerial, operational and regulatory requirements of publicly registered alternative asset entities, such as BDCs. The Company believes that the active and ongoing participation by FS Investments and its affiliates in the credit markets, and the depth of experience and disciplined investment approach of FSIC II Advisor’s management team, will allow FSIC II Advisor to successfully execute the Company’s investment strategies.

10


About KKR Credit

KKR Credit is a Delaware limited liability company, located at 555 California Street, 50th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94104, registered as an investment adviser with the SEC under the Advisers Act. It had over $41 billion of assets under management as of September 30, 2017 across investment funds, structured finance vehicles, specialty finance companies and separately managed accounts that invest capital in both liquid and illiquid credit strategies on behalf of some of the largest public and private pension plans, global financial institutions, university endowments and other institutional and public market investors. Its investment professionals utilize an industry and thematic approach to investing and benefit from access, where appropriate, to the broader resources and intellectual capital of KKR & Co. L.P. (“KKR & Co.”). KKR Credit is a subsidiary of KKR & Co., a leading global investment firm with over $153 billion in assets under management as of September 30, 2017 that manages investments across multiple asset classes including private equity, energy, infrastructure, real estate, credit and hedge funds. KKR & Co. aims to generate attractive investment returns by following a patient and disciplined investment approach, employing world-class people, and driving growth and value creation in the assets it manages. KKR & Co. invests its own capital alongside the capital it manages for fund investors and brings debt and equity investment opportunities to others through its capital markets business.

KKR & Co.��s business offers a broad range of investment management services to its fund investors and provides capital markets services to KKR & Co., its portfolio companies and third parties. Throughout KKR & Co.’s history, KKR & Co. has consistently been a leader in the private equity industry. KKR & Co. has grown its firm by expanding its geographical presence and building businesses in new areas, such as credit, special situations, hedge funds, collateralized loan obligations, capital markets, infrastructure, energy and real estate. These efforts build on KKR & Co.’s core principles and industry expertise, allowing KKR & Co. to leverage the intellectual capital and synergies in its businesses, and to capitalize on a broader range of the opportunities it sources. Additionally, KKR & Co. has increased its focus on meeting the needs of its existing fund investors and in developing relationships with new investors in its funds.

KKR & Co. conducts its business with offices throughout the world, providing it with apre-eminent global platform for sourcing transactions, raising capital and carrying out capital markets activities. KKR & Co.’s growth has been driven by value that it has created through its operationally focused investment approach, the expansion of its existing businesses, its entry into new lines of business, innovation in the products that it offers investors in its funds, an increased focus on providing tailored solutions to its clients and the integration of capital markets distribution activities.

KKR & Co. has also used its balance sheet as a significant source of capital to further grow and expand its business, increase its participation in its existing businesses and further align its interests with those of its fund investors and other stakeholders.

Similar Investment Strategy.Below are the management fee rate and gross assets of two other registered investment companies advised by KKR Credit, each of which has a similar investment objective to that of the Company.qualified, or until his earlier resignation or removal.

 

Fund Name, Address and

Age(1)

 Management Fee (as a
percentage of gross assets(1))
Gross Assets as of
September  30, 2017

Position(s) with

Company

 

Applicable FeeLength of

Waiver/Expense
Reimbursement

Corporate Capital Trust, Inc.Time Served

 1.50%Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years
 $4,423 million No

Corporate Capital Trust IIBrian Gerson

Age: 52

 2.00%Co-President $157.4 millionSince 2019 Yes(2)

(1)With respect to Corporate Capital Trust, Inc., for purposes of calculating the management fee, cash and cash equivalents are excluded from the definition of gross assets.
(2)$606,252 for the quarter ended September 30, 2017.

Management of the InvestmentCo-Advisors

The management of the Company’s investment portfolio will be the responsibility of a joint investment committee which will be comprised of three appointees of FS Investments or one of its affiliates (initially Sean Coleman, Brian Gerson and Michael Kelly) and three appointees of KKR Credit (initially Todd Builione, Daniel Pietrzak and Ryan Wilson). A team of dedicated investment professionals consisting of personnel from FSIC II

11


Advisor and KKR Credit will provide services to the Company. Below is biographical information relating to certain key personnel involved in rendering such services:

Sean Coleman serves as a managing director of FSIC and as managing director of investment management of FS Investments and its affiliated investment advisers. Mr. Coleman also serves on the investment committee of the investment advisers to the funds in the Fund Complex. Mr. Coleman is primarily responsible for reviewing and assessing the fit of potential investments within each fund’s investment portfolio, performing due diligence on the same and monitoring existing investments. Before joining FS Investments and its affiliated investment advisers in October 2013, Mr. Coleman worked at Golub Capital, where he served in various capacities, including as a managing director in the direct lending group and as chief financial officer and treasurer of its BDC. Before he joined Golub Capital in September 2005, Mr. Coleman worked in merchant and investment banking, including at Goldman, Sachs & Co. and Wasserstein Perella & Co. Mr. Coleman earned a B.A. in History from Princeton University and an M.B.A. with Distinction from Harvard Business School, where he received the Loeb Award for academic excellence in finance.

Brian Gerson has served as theCo-President of the Company since October 2019. He joined FS Investments in November 2017 as its Head of Private Credit and has more than 20 years of experience in credit investing and corporatecorporation lending, with specific expertise in lending through BDCs. Mr. Gerson has served on the Advisor’s investment committee since April 2018. Prior to joining FS Investments, he most recently served as Group Head and Managing Director at LStar Capital, the credit affiliate of Lone Star Funds, from April 2015 to November 2017. At LStar, Mr. Gerson developed and maintained deep relationships with the financial sponsor community and middle market intermediaries while significantly expanding LStar’s corporate credit business. Prior to joining LStar, Mr. Gerson was a founding member of Solar Capital Partners, which serves as investment adviser to two yield-oriented BDCs. At Solar Capital, he spent seven years from January 2007 to September 2014 in various credit, origination, management, and business development roles, most recently serving as Executive Vice President of Solar Capital Limited. Prior to joining Solar Capital, Mr. Gerson spent 12 years in various positions, including Managing Director at CIBC World Markets in its Leveraged Finance and Financial Sponsors Group. Mr. Gerson graduated summa cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa from Tufts University where he earned a Bachelor of Arts in Mathematics.

Daniel Pietrzak

Age: 44

Michael Kelly currently serves as president of FS Investments and has presided in such role since July 2017. Mr. Kelly also serves as chief investment officer of FS Investments and executive vice president of its affiliated investments advisers, and has presided in such roles since January 2015. Among other things, Mr. Kelly oversees the investment management function at FS Investments and its affiliated investment advisers. Before joining FS Investments and its affiliated investment advisers, Mr. Kelly was the chief executive officer of ORIX USA Asset Management (“ORIX”), where he led the company’s acquisition of Robeco, a $250 billion global asset management company and the largest acquisition in ORIX’s50-yearCo-President, history. Mr. Kelly started his career on Wall Street at Salomon Brothers and went on to join hedge fund pioneers Omega Advisors and Tiger Management. Mr. Kelly then helped build and lead the hedge fund firm, FrontPoint Partners, where he first served as chief investment officer and eventuallyco-chief executive officer. Mr. Kelly is a graduate of Cornell University and earned his M.B.A. at Stanford University. Mr. Kelly is aco-founder and board member of the Spotlight Foundation, and serves as a trustee of the Tiger Foundation and the Stanford Business School Trust.

Todd C. Builioneis a member of the Board of Directors of CCT and CCT’s Chief ExecutiveInvestment Officer and also a trustee of CCT II. Mr. Builione joined KKR & Co. in 2013 and is a Member of KKR & Co. and President of KKR Credit & Capital Markets. Mr. Builione also serves on the KKR Global Risk Committee. Prior to joining KKR & Co., Mr. Builione served as President of Highbridge Capital Management, CEO of Highbridge’s Hedge Fund business and a member of the Investment and Risk Committees. Mr. Builione began his career at the Goldman Sachs Group, where he was predominantly focused on capital markets and mergers and acquisitions for financial institutions. He received a B.S., summa cum laude, Merrill Presidential Scholar, from Cornell University and a J.D., cum laude, from Harvard Law School. Mr. Builione serves on the Board of Directors of Marshall Wace, a liquid alternatives provider which formed a strategic partnership with KKR & Co. in 2015. Mr. Builione also serves on the Board of Directors of Harlem RBI (a community-based youth development

12


organization located in East Harlem, New York), on the Advisory Council of Cornell University’s Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, and on the Board of Directors of the Pingry School.

Since 2018Daniel Pietrzakcurrently serveshas served as CCT’sthe Chief Investment Officer.Officer of the Company since April 2018 and theCo-President since October 2019. Mr. PietrakPietrzak joined KKR Credit in 2016 and is a Member of KKR & Co.Credit and theCo-Head of Private Credit. Mr. Pietrzak is a portfolio manager for KKR Credit’s private credit funds and portfolios and a member of the Global Private Credit Investment Committee, Europe Direct Lending Investment Committee and KKR Credit Portfolio Management Committee. Prior to joining KKR Credit, Mr. Pietrzak was a Managing Director and theCo-Head of Deutsche Bank’s Structured Finance business across the Americas and Europe. Previously, Mr. Pietrzak was based in New York and held various roles in the structured finance and credit businesses of Société Générale and CIBC World Markets. Mr. Pietrzak started his career at Price WaterhousePricewaterhouseCoopers in New York and is a Certified Public Accountant. Mr. Pietrzak holds an M.B.A. in Finance from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and a B.S. in Accounting from Lehigh University.

Steven Lilly

Age: 50

Chief Financial OfficerSince 2019Ryan L.G. WilsonSteven Lillyhas served as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company since November 2019 and also serves as Chief Financial Officer of FSK. He joined FS Investments in October 2019 as a Managing Director. Mr. Lilly has a wealth of experience in the BDC space and most recently served as Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Triangle Capital Corporation (“Triangle”), and as a member of its Board of Directors from 2006 and as its Chief Compliance Officer from 2007, prior to Triangle’s sale to Benefit Street Partners and Barings, LLC in 2018. From 2005 to 2006, Mr. Lilly served as Chief Financial Officer of Triangle Capital Partners, LLC. At Triangle, he built the company’s financial and operating infrastructure, oversaw listings on the Nasdaq and New York Stock Exchange in 2007 and 2010, respectively, and led all corporate M&A and strategic processes. Prior to joining Triangle, Mr. Lilly spent seven years as Senior Vice President of Finance & Treasurer at SpectraSite Communications, a publicly traded wireless tower company, which was sold to American Tower Corporation in 2005. He began his career in the media and communications capital markets group at First Union, now part of Wells Fargo. Mr. Lilly earned a B.A. in History from Davidson College and completed the Executive Education Program at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He currently serves on the board of trustees of UNC/Rex Healthcare, Episcopal High School, Saint Mary’s School, and Historic Oakwood Cemetery in Raleigh, NC. He is also a Director at America First Multifamily Investors, LP, a publicly traded mortgage REIT, where he serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee.

21


Name, Address and

Age(1)

Position(s) with

Company

Length of

Time Served

Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years

Stephen S. Sypherd

Age: 42

Secretary, General CounselSince 2013Stephen S. Sypherd has served as the Secretary of the Company since January 2013 and as the General Counsel since April 2018. He previously served as the Company’s Vice President and Treasurer. Mr. Sypherd also currently serves as CCT’s Chiefthe General Counsel and Secretary of FSK and as the General Counsel, Vice President, Treasurer and/or Secretary of the other funds sponsored by FS Investments. Mr. Sypherd has also served in various senior officer capacities for FS Investments and its affiliated investment advisers, including as senior vice president from December 2011 to August 2014, general counsel since January 2013 and managing director since August 2014. Prior to joining FS Investments, Mr. Sypherd served for eight years as an attorney at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, where he practiced corporate and securities law. Mr. Sypherd received his B.A. in Economics from Villanova University and his J.D. from the Georgetown University Law Center, where he was an executive editor of the Georgetown Law Journal. He serves on the board of trustees of the University of the Arts (and on the advancement and governance committees of that board).

Drew O’Toole

Age: 31

Co-Chief Operating OfficerSince 2019Drew O’Toole has served as theCo-Chief Operating Officer of the Company since October 2019. He is a Managing Director of FS Investments, which he joined in April 2014. Previously, Mr. O’Toole was a Director of Corporate Strategy at FS Investments. His responsibilities were primarily focused on the design, analysis and Associate Portfolio Manager.implementation of key firm strategic initiatives. Prior to FS Investments, he worked in various roles at Cambridge Associates LLC, an institutional investment advisory and consulting firm. Mr. O’Toole graduated summa cum laude from the University of Pittsburgh with degrees in Finance and Business Management. He is also a CFA charterholder.

Ryan Wilson

Age: 42

Co-Chief Operating OfficerSince 2019Ryan Wilson has served as theCo-Chief Operating Officer of the Company since October 2019. He joined KKR Credit in 2006 and he is currently a Director.Managing Director of KKR and the Chief Operating Officer of KKR Private Credit. Mr. Wilson served as CCT’s Chief Operating Officer prior to its merger with FSK and has held various roles across KKR Credit. Prior to joining KKR Credit, Mr. Wilson was with PricewaterhouseCoopers, serving a variety of clients across industries. Mr. Wilson holds a B.A. in Economics with honors from Wilfrid Laurier University and a MAcc in Accounting from the University of Waterloo. He also is a CFA charterholder, Chartered Professional Accountant and a Chartered Accountant.

William Goebel

In performing their duties underAge: 45

Chief Accounting OfficerSince 2019William Goebel has served as the Investment Co Advisory Agreements,Company’s Chief Accounting Officer since October 2019. Previously, Mr. Goebel served as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer from September 2016 to October 2019 and as its Chief Financial Officer from July 2011 to September 2014. Mr. Goebel also serves as the Chief Accounting Officer for FSK and as the Chief Financial Officer for certain of the other funds sponsored by FS Advisor EntitiesInvestments. Prior to joining FS Investments, Mr. Goebel held a senior manager audit position with Ernst & Young LLP in the firm’s asset management practice from 2003 to January 2011, where he was responsible for the audits of regulated investment companies, private investment partnerships, investment advisers and KKR Credit will providebroker-dealers. Mr. Goebel began his career at a regional public accounting firm, Tait, Weller and Baker LLP in 1997. Mr. Goebel received a B.S. in Economics from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania in 1997. He is a Certified Public Accountant and holds the CFA Institute’s Chartered Financial Analyst designation.

James F. Volk

Age: 56

Chief Compliance OfficerSince 2015James F. Volk has served as the Chief Compliance Officer of the Company with services to facilitatesince April 2015. Mr. Volk also serves as the conductchief compliance officer of its business, including but not limited to: (a) sourcing, structuring, underwriting, performing diligence, executingFSK and monitoring investments; (b) researching, selecting, trading and underwriting new investment opportunities; (c) investor account management; (d) legal, compliance, finance, accounting, operations and human resources services; and (e) risk management functions. Thethe other funds sponsored by FS Advisor Entities and KKR Credit are collectivelyInvestments. He is responsible for providing appropriate assets, resources, timeall compliance and regulatory issues affecting us and the foregoing companies. Before joining FS Investments and its affiliated investment advisers in October 2014, Mr. Volk was the chief compliance officer, chief accounting officer and head of traditional fund operations at SEI’s Investment Manager Services market unit. Mr. Volk was also formerly the assistant chief accountant at the SEC’s Division of Investment Management and a senior manager for PricewaterhouseCoopers. Mr. Volk graduated from the University of Delaware with a B.S. in Accounting.

22


(1)

The address for each officer is c/o FS KKR Capital Corp. II, 201 Rouse Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19112.

Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted a code of business conduct and ethics (as amended and restated, the “Code of Business Conduct and Ethics”) pursuant to Rule17j-1 promulgated under the 1940 Act, which applies to, among others, its officers, including its Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, as well as the members of the Board. The Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics can be accessed via the Company’s website at www.fsinvestments.com/support/articles/corporate-governance-fskii. In addition, the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on the EDGAR Database on the SEC’s Internet site at www.sec.gov. The Company intends to disclose any amendments to or waivers of required provisions of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics on Form8-K, as required by the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

Practice and Policies Regarding Personal Trading and Hedging of Company Equity

The Company has also established a policy designed to prohibit our officers, directors, and certain employees of the Advisor from purchasing or selling shares of the Company while in possession of material nonpublic information, or otherwise using such information for their personal benefit or in any manner that would violate applicable laws and regulations. The policy also prohibits all directors and officers from engaging in hedging or monetization transactions or similar arrangements with respect to the Company’s securities without prior approval of the Company’s chief compliance officer.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The Company’s executive officers do not receive any direct compensation from the Company. The Company does not currently have any employees and does not expect to have any employees. As an externally managed BDC, services necessary for the Company’s business are provided by individuals who are employees of the Advisor or its affiliates or by individuals who are contracted by the Advisor, the Company or their respective affiliates to work on behalf of the Company pursuant to the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement, dated December 18, 2019 (the “Investment Advisory Agreement”), between the Company and the Advisor and that certain Administration Agreement, dated December 18, 2019 (the “Administration Agreement”), between the Company and the Advisor. Each of the Company’s executive officers is an employee of the Advisor or its affiliates and theday-to-day investment operations and administration of the Company’s portfolio are managed by the Advisor. In addition, the Company will reimburse the Advisor for its allocable portion of expenses incurred by the Advisor in performing its obligations under the Investment Advisory Agreement and the Administration Agreement.

The Investment Advisory Agreement and the Administration Agreement provide that the Advisor (and its officers, managers, partners, members (and their members, including the owners of their members), agents, employees, controlling persons and any other person or entity affiliated with, or acting on behalf of, the Advisor) shall be entitled to indemnification (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) for any liability or loss suffered by the Advisor, and the Advisor shall be held harmless for any loss or liability suffered by the Company, arising out of the performance of any of its duties or obligations under the Investment Advisory Agreement or the Administration Agreement, respectively, or otherwise as the Company’s investment adviser or administrator, respectively; provided, however, that the Advisor cannot be indemnified for any liability arising out of willful misfeasance, bad faith, or negligence in the performance of the Advisor’s duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of the Advisor’s duties and obligations under the Investment Advisory Agreement or the Administration Agreement, as applicable.

23


Director Compensation

The Company does not pay compensation to its directors who also serve in an executive officer capacity for the Company or the Advisor. The Company’s directors who do not also serve in an executive officer capacity for the Company or the Advisor are entitled to receive annual cash retainer fees and annual fees for serving as a committee chairperson. These directors are Mmes. Adams and Sandler and Messrs. Ford, Goldstein, Hagan, Harrow, Hopkins, Kropp and Imasogie. Mr. Hagan also receives an annual retainer for his service as lead independent director.

Amounts payable under these fee arrangements for the Company are determined and paid quarterly in arrears as set forth below and are shared pro rata by the Fund Complex based on assets under management.

   Amount 

Annual Board Retainer

  $160,000 

Annual Lead Independent Director Retainer

  $30,000 

Annual Committee Chair Retainers

  

Audit Committee

  $25,000 

Valuation Committee

  $25,000 

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

  $15,000 

The Company will also reimburse each of the above directors for all reasonable and authorized business expenses in accordance with its policies as in effect from time to time, including reimbursement of reasonableout-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending eachin-person Board meeting and eachin-person Board committee meeting not held concurrently with a Board meeting.

The table below sets forth the compensation received by each current and former director from (i) the Company and (ii) all of the companies in the Fund Complex, including the Company, and FS Investment Corporation III (“FSIC III”), FS Investment Corporation IV (“FSIC IV”) and CCT II in the aggregate, in each case, for service during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. Our directors do not receive any retirement benefits from us.

Name of Director

  Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
by the Company
   Total Compensation
from the Company
   Total
Compensation
from the
Fund
Complex
 

Michael C. Forman

   —      —      —   

Todd Builione

   —      —      —   

Barbara Adams

  $160,000   $160,000   $160,000 

Brian R. Ford

  $185,000   $185,000   $185,000 

Richard Goldstein

  $160,000   $160,000   $160,000 

Michael J. Hagan

  $190,000   $190,000   $190,000 

Jeffrey K. Harrow

  $175,000   $175,000   $175,000 

Jerel A. Hopkins

  $160,000   $160,000   $160,000 

James H. Kropp

  $185,000   $185,000   $185,000 

Osagie Imasogie(1)

  $80,000   $80,000   $80,000 

Elizabeth Sandler(2)

   —      —      —   

Former Directors:

      

Joseph P. Ujobai(3)

  $46,250   $46,250   $46,250 

Frederick Arnold(4)

  $160,000   $160,000   $160,000 

(1)

Mr. Imasogie joined the Board on July 8, 2019.

(2)

Ms. Sandler joined the Board on October 30, 2019.

24


(3)

Mr. Ujobai resigned from the Board, effective as of March 14, 2019.

(4)

Mr. Arnold resigned from the Board, effective as of November 26, 2019.

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions

The Company has procedures in place for the review, approval and monitoring of transactions involving the Company and certain persons related to the Company. For example, the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics generally prohibits any employee, officer or director from engaging in any transaction where there is a conflict between such individual’s personal interest and the interests of the Company. Waivers to the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for any executive officer or member of the Board must be approved by the Board and are publicly disclosed as required by applicable law and regulations. In addition, the Audit Committee is required to review and approve all transactions with related persons (as defined in Item 404 of RegulationS-K promulgated under the Exchange Act).

Investment Advisory Agreement

The Company is externally managed by the Advisor. On December 18, 2019, the Company entered into the Investment Advisory Agreement with the Advisor, which amended and restated the investment advisory and administrative services agreement, dated April 9, 2018 (the “Original FS/KKR Advisory Agreement”) between the Company and the Advisor.

Pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement, the Advisor is entitled to a base management fee calculated at an annual rate of 1.50% of the average weekly value of the Company’s gross assets excluding cash and cash equivalents (gross assets equal the total assets of the Company as set forth on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets), which base management fee is reduced from 1.5% to 1.0% on all assets financed using leverage over 1.0xdebt-to-equity, and an incentive fee based on the Company’s performance. The base management fee is payable quarterly in arrears. All or any part of the base management fee not taken as to any quarter shall be deferred without interest and may be taken in such other quarter as the Advisor shall determine.

Pursuant to the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement, the Advisor may also be entitled to receive a subordinated incentive fee on income. The subordinated incentive fee on income under the Investment Advisory Agreement, which is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears, equals 20.0% of theCompany’s “pre-incentive fee net investment income” for the immediately preceding quarter and is subject to a hurdle rate, expressed as a rate of return on the value of the Company’s net assets, equal to 1.75% per quarter, or an annualized hurdle rate of 7.0%. As a result, the Advisor will not earn this incentive fee for any quarter until theCompany’s pre-incentive fee net investment income for such quarter exceeds the hurdle rate of 1.75%. Once theCompany’s pre-incentive fee net investment income in any quarter exceeds the hurdle rate, the Advisor will be entitled toa “catch-up” fee equal to the amount ofthe pre-incentive fee net investment income in excess of the hurdle rate, until theCompany’s pre-incentive fee net investment income for such quarter equals 2.1875%, or 8.75% annually, of net assets. Thereafter, the Advisor will be entitled to receive 20.0%of pre-incentive fee net investment income.

Commencing with the quarter ending March 31, 2022, the subordinated incentive fee on income is subject to a cap equal to (i) 20.0% of the “pershare pre-incentive fee return” for the then-current and eleven preceding calendar quarters (or fewer number of fiscal quarters) commencing with the quarter ending March 31, 2020 minus the cumulative “per share incentive fees” accrued and/or payable for the eleven preceding calendar quarters (or fewer number of fiscal quarters) commencing with the quarter ending March 31, 2020 multiplied by (ii) the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the calendar quarter (or any portion thereof) for which the subordinated incentive fee on income is being calculated.

Pursuant to the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement, the incentive fee on capital gains is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment

25


Advisory Agreement). This fee equals 20.0% of the Company’s incentive fee capital gains, which shall equal the realized capital gains of CCT II, FSIC III, FSIC IV and the Company (without duplication) on a cumulative basis from inception, calculated as of the end of each calendar year, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation (without duplication) on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any capital gain incentive fees previously paid by CCT II, FSIC III, FSIC IV and the Company. On a quarterly basis, the Company accrues for the capital gains incentive fee by calculating such fee as if it were due and payable as of the end of such period. The Company includes unrealized gains in the calculation of the capital gains incentive fee expense and related accrued capital gains incentive fee. This accrual reflects the incentive fees that would be payable to the Advisor if the Company’s entire portfolio was liquidated at its fair value as of the balance sheet date even though the Advisor is not entitled to an incentive fee with respect to unrealized gains unless and until such gains are actually realized.

Administration Agreement

Also on December 18, 2019, the Company entered into the Administration Agreement with the Advisor. Pursuant to the Administration Agreement, the Advisor will provide administrative services necessary for the operation of the Company, including providing general ledger accounting, fund accounting, legal services, investor relations and other administrative services. There will be no separate fee paid by the Company to the Advisor in connection with the services provided under the Administration Agreement, provided, however, that the Company will reimburse the Advisor no less than quarterly for all costs and expenses incurred by the Advisor in performing its obligations and providing personnel and facilities thereunder. The Advisor will allocate the cost of such services to the Company based on factors such as total assets, revenues, time allocations and/or other reasonable metrics.

Original FS/KKR Advisory Agreement

Prior to the Company’s entry into the Investment Advisory Agreement, the Company was party to the Original FS/KKR Advisory Agreement, by and between the Advisor and the Company. Pursuant to the Original FS/KKR Advisory Agreement, the Advisor was entitled to a base management fee calculated at an annual rate of 1.50% of the average weekly value of the Company’s gross assets and an incentive fee based on the Company’s performance. The base management fee was payable quarterly in arrears, and all or any part of the base management fee not taken as to any quarter was deferred without interest and could be taken in such other quarter as the Advisor determined.

Pursuant to the terms of the Original FS/KKR Advisory Agreement, the incentive fee on capital gains was determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Original FS/KKR Advisory Agreement). This fee equaled 20.0% of the Company’s incentive fee capital gains, which equaled the Company’s realized capital gains on a cumulative basis from inception, calculated as of the end of each calendar year, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any capital gain incentive fees previously paid by the Company. On a quarterly basis, the Company accrued for the capital gains incentive fee by calculating such fees as if it were due and payable as of the end of such period. The Company included unrealized gains in the calculation of the capital gains incentive fee expense and related accrued capital gains incentive fee. This accrual reflected the incentive fees that would be payable to the Advisor if the Company’s entire portfolio was liquidated at its fair value as of the balance sheet date even though the Advisor was not entitled to an incentive fee with respect to unrealized gains unless and until such gains are actually realized.

Pursuant to the terms of the Original FS/KKR Advisory Agreement, the Advisor was entitled to receive a subordinated incentive fee on income. The subordinated incentive fee on income under the Original FS/KKR Advisory Agreement which was calculated and payable quarterly in arrears, equaled 20.0% of the Company’s“pre-incentive fee net investment income” for the immediately preceding quarter and was subject to a hurdle rate, expressed as a rate of return on adjusted capital equal to 1.75% per quarter, or an annualized hurdle rate of 7.0%.

26


For purposes of this fee, “adjusted capital” means cumulative gross proceeds generated from sales of the Company’s common stock (including proceeds from its distribution reinvestment plan) reduced for distributions paid to stockholders from proceeds ofnon-liquidating dispositions of the Company’s investments and amounts paid for share repurchases pursuant to the Company’s share repurchase program. As a result, the Advisor would not earn this incentive fee for any quarter until the Company’spre-incentive fee net investment income for such quarter exceeded the hurdle rate of 1.75%. Once the Company’spre-incentive fee net investment income in any quarter exceeded the hurdle rate, the Advisor was entitled to a“catch-up” fee equal to the amount of the Company’spre-incentive fee net investment income in excess of the hurdle rate, until the Company’spre-incentive fee net investment income for such quarter equaled 2.1875%, or 8.75% annually of the Company’s adjusted capital. Thereafter, the Advisor was entitled to receive 20.0% of the Company’spre-incentive fee net investment income.

The following table describes the fees and expenses accrued under the Investment Advisory Agreement, the Original FS/KKR Advisory Agreement and the Administration Agreement, as applicable, during the year ended December 31, 2019 (dollars in millions):

Related Party

  

Source Agreement

  

Description

  Year Ended
December 31,
2019
 

Advisor

  Investment Advisory Agreement and Original FS/KKR Advisory Agreement  Base Management Fee(1)  $72 

Advisor

  Investment Advisory Agreement and Original FS/KKR Advisory Agreement  Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income(2)  $29 

Advisor

  Administration Agreement and Original FS/KKR Advisory Agreement  Administrative Services Expenses(3)  $5 

(1)

During the year ended December 31, 2019, $69 in base management fees were paid to the Advisor.

(2)

During the year ended December 31, 2019, $30 in subordinated incentive fees on income were paid to the Advisor. As of December 31, 2019, a subordinated incentive fee on income of $11 was payable to the Advisor.

(3)

During the year ended December 31, 2019, $3 of the accrued administrative services expenses related to the allocation of costs of administrative personnel in order to providefor services rendered to the Company by the Advisor and the remainder related to other reimbursable expenses. The Company paid $4 in administrative services required underexpenses to the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements. The FS Advisor Entities and KKR Credit have agreed to coordinate their activities during the period in which the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements would be in effect to avoid duplication of efforts and ensure a balanced and effective allocation of responsibilities and net fee revenue earned by the FS Advisor Entities and KKR Credit, and efficiency in the provisionyear ended December 31, 2019.

Allocation of the Advisor’s Time

The Company relies on the Advisor to manage the Company’sday-to-day activities and to implement its investment strategies. The Advisor, FS Investments, KKR Credit and certain of their affiliates are presently, and plan in the future to continue to be, involved with activities that are unrelated to the Company. As a result of these activities, the Advisor, FS Investments, KKR Credit and certain of their affiliates will have conflicts of interest in allocating their time between the Company and other activities in which they are or may become involved, including the management of the other BDCs in the Fund Complex. The Advisor, FS Investments, KKR Credit and their employees will devote only as much of its or their time to the Company’s business as the Advisor, FS Investments and KKR Credit, in their judgment, determine is reasonably required, which will be substantially less than their full time. Therefore, the Advisor, its personnel and certain affiliates may experience conflicts of interest in allocating management time, services and functions among the Company and any other business ventures in which they or any of their key personnel, as applicable, are or may become involved. This could result in actions that are more favorable to other affiliated entities than to the Company.

27


However, the Company believes that the members of the Advisor’s management and the other key debt finance professionals have sufficient time to fully discharge their responsibilities to the Company and to the other businesses in which they are involved. The Company believes that its affiliates and executive officers will devote the time required to manage the Company’s business and expect that the amount of time a particular executive officer or affiliate devotes to the Company will vary during the course of the year and depend on the Company’s business activities at the given time. Because many of the operational aspects involved with managing the Company and the other BDCs in the Fund Complex are similar, there are significant efficiencies created by the Advisor providing services to such entities. For example, the Advisor has streamlined the structure for financial reporting, internal controls and investment approval processes for the Company and the other BDCs in the Fund Complex.

Competition and Allocation of Investment Opportunities

The Advisor and its affiliates are simultaneously providing investment advisory services to other affiliated entities, including the other BDCs in the Fund Complex. The Advisor may determine that it is appropriate for the Company and one or more other investment accounts managed by the Advisor or any of its affiliates to participate in an investment opportunity. To the extent the Company makesco-investments with investment accounts managed by the Advisor or its affiliates, theseco-investment opportunities may give rise to conflicts of interest or perceived conflicts of interest among the Company and the other participating accounts. In addition, conflicts of interest or perceived conflicts of interest may also arise in determining which investment opportunities should be presented to the Company and other participating accounts.

To mitigate these conflicts, the Advisor will seek to execute such transactions on a fair and equitable basis and in accordance with its allocation policies, taking into account various factors, which may include: the source of origination of the investment opportunity; investment objectives and strategies; tax considerations; risk, diversification or investment concentration parameters; characteristics of the security; size of available investment; available liquidity and liquidity requirements; regulatory restrictions; and/or such other factors as may be relevant to a particular transaction.

As the Advisor and affiliates of FS Investments and KKR Credit currently serve as the investment adviser to other entities and accounts, it is possible that some investment opportunities will be provided to such other entities and accounts rather than the Company.

Investments

As a BDC, the Company is subject to certain regulatory restrictions in making its investments. For example, BDCs generally are not permitted toco-invest with certain affiliated entities in transactions originated by the BDC or its affiliates in the absence of an exemptive order from the SEC. However, BDCs are permitted to, and may, simultaneouslyco-invest in transactions where price is the only negotiated term.

In an order dated June 4, 2013 (“the FS Order”), the SEC granted exemptive relief permitting the Company, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, toco-invest in certain privately negotiated investment transactions with certain affiliates of our former investment adviser, including FS Energy and Power Fund, FSK (f/k/a FS Investment Corporation) and any future BDCs that are advised by our former investment adviser or its affiliated investment advisers. However, in connection with the investment advisory relationship with the Advisor, and in an effort to mitigate potential future conflicts of interest, the Board authorized and directed that the Company (i) withdraw from the FS Order, except with respect to any transaction in which the Company participated in reliance on the FS Order prior to April 9, 2018, and (ii) rely on an exemptive relief order, dated April 3, 2018, that permits the Company, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, toco-invest in certain privately negotiated investment transactions, including investments originated and directly negotiated by the Advisor or KKR Credit, with certain affiliates of the Advisor.

28


Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

On March 22, 2019, the Company notified RSM US LLP that RSM US LLP, which had acted as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 through 2018, had been dismissed as the Company’s independent public accounting firm. The Audit Committee approved the dismissal of RSM US LLP. The reports of RSM US LLP on the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principle. During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the subsequent interim period through March 22, 2019, there were: (i) no disagreements within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(iv) ofRegulation S-K and the related instructions between the Company and RSM US LLP on any matters of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure which, if not resolved to RSM US LLP’s satisfaction, would have caused RSM US LLP to make reference thereto in their reports; and (ii) no “reportable events” within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(v) ofRegulation S-K. On March 26, 2019, the Company appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP to act as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, which appointment was ratified by the Company’s stockholders on November 6, 2019.

On February 20, 2020, the Company appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP to act as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2020. The appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP was previously recommended by the Audit Committee. The Company knows of no direct financial or material indirect financial interest of Deloitte & Touche LLP in the Company. A representative of Deloitte & Touche LLP is expected to be available to answer questions during the Annual Meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do.

Fees

Set forth in the table below are audit fees, audit related fees, tax fees and all other fees billed to the Company by Deloitte & Touche LLP for professional services performed for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:

Fiscal Year

  Audit Fees   Audit-Related Fees(1)   Tax Fees   All Other Fees(2) 

2019

  $634,008    —      —      —   

2018

   —      —      —      —   

(1)

“Audit-Related Fees” are those fees billed to the Company thereunder.

Termsby Deloitte & Touche LLP for services provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP or fees billed for expenses relating to the review by Deloitte & Touche LLP of the FSIC II Advisor InvestmentCompany’s registration statements filed with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Act.

(2)

“All Other Fees” are those fees, if any, billed to the Company by Deloitte & Touche LLP in connection withCo-Advisory Agreementpermitted non-audit services.

Set forth in the table below are audit fees, audit related fees, tax fees and all other fees billed to the Company by RSM US LLP for professional services performed for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:

Fiscal Year

  Audit Fees   Audit-Related Fees(1)   Tax Fees   All Other Fees(2) 

2019

   —      —      —     $46,350 

2018

  $399,700    —      —     $35,350 

(1)

The terms“Audit-Related Fees” are those fees billed to the Company by RSM US LLP for services provided by RSM US LLP or fees billed for expenses relating to the review by RSM US LLP of the FSIC II Advisor InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement are substantially similar to those ofCompany’s registration statements filed with the Current Investment Advisory Agreement, except for, among other things, the fees payable thereunder and the date of effectiveness. Furthermore, the terms of the FSIC II Advisor InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement are substantially similar to those of the KKR InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement. The description of the FSIC II Advisor InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement that follows is a summary only and is qualified in its entirety by referenceSEC pursuant to the copy of the form of the FSIC II Advisor InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement included in Exhibit A hereto.Securities Act.

(2)

Duties.Subject“All Other Fees” are those fees, if any, billed to the overall supervision of the Board, FSIC II Advisor,Company by RSM US LLP in coordinationconnection with KKR Credit, will oversee the Company’spermittedday-to-daynon-audit operations and provide the Company with investment advisory services. Under the terms of the FSIC II Advisor InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement, FSIC II Advisor will, in coordination with KKR Credit:

(i)determine the composition and allocation of the Company’s investment portfolio, the nature and timing of any changes therein and the manner of implementing such changes;

 

(ii)identify, evaluate and negotiate the structure of the investments made by the Company;

29


Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committee reviews, negotiates and approves in advance the scope of work, any related engagement letter and the fees to be charged by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for audit services and permittednon-audit services for the Company and for permittednon-audit services for the Advisor and any affiliates thereof that provide services to the Company if suchnon-audit services have a direct impact on the operations or financial reporting of the Company. Any requests for audit, audit-related, tax and other services that have not received generalpre-approval must be submitted to the Audit Committee for specificpre-approval in accordance with itspre-approval policy, irrespective of the amount of fees associated with such services, and cannot commence until such approval has been granted. Normally,pre-approval is considered at regularly scheduled meetings of the Audit Committee. However, the Audit Committee may delegatepre-approval authority to one or more of its members. The member or members to whom such authority is delegated must report anypre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The Audit Committee does not delegate its responsibilities topre-approve services performed by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm to management. All of the audit and permittednon-audit services described above for which Deloitte & Touche LLP and RSM US LLP billed the Company for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 werepre-approved by the Audit Committee.

Audit Committee Report

As part of its oversight of the Company’s financial statements, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with both management and Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, the Company’s consolidated financial statements filed with the SEC for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. Management advised the Audit Committee that all financial statements were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and reviewed significant accounting issues with the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee also discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”), the SEC and the Auditing Standards Board of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.

The Audit Committee has established apre-approval policy that describes the permitted audit, audit-related, tax, and other services to be provided by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Pursuant to the policy, the Audit Committeepre-approves the audit andnon-audit services performed by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm in order to assure that the provision of such services does not impair the firm’s independence.

Any requests for audit, audit-related tax and other services that have not received generalpre-approval must be submitted to the Audit Committee for specificpre-approval in accordance with itspre-approval policy, irrespective of the amount, and cannot commence until such approval has been granted. Normally,pre-approval is provided at regularly scheduled meetings of the Audit Committee. However, the Audit Committee may delegatepre-approval authority to one or more of its members. The member or members to whom such authority is delegated must report anypre-approval decisions to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The Audit Committee does not delegate itsresponsibilities to pre-approve services performed by Deloitte & Touche LLP to management.

The Audit Committee received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from Deloitte & Touche LLP required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding Deloitte & Touche LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP its independence. The Audit Committee has reviewed the audit fees paid by the Company to Deloitte & Touche LLP. It hasalso reviewed non-audit services and fees to assure compliance with the Company’s and the Audit Committee’s policies restricting Deloitte & Touche LLP from performing services that might impair its independence.

30


Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019 be included in the Company’s annual reporton Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 for filing with the SEC. The Audit Committee also recommended the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP to serve as the independent registered public accounting firm of FSIC II for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.

Audit Committee Members:

Brian R. Ford

James H. Kropp

Osagie Imasogie

The material in this Audit Committee report is not “soliciting material,” is not deemed “filed” with the SEC, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE

“FOR” EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES

31


PROPOSAL 2: APPROVAL OF APPLICATION OF REDUCED ASSET COVERAGE

REQUIREMENTS TO THE COMPANY TO ALLOW THE COMPANY TO DOUBLE THE

MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF ITS PERMITTED BORROWINGS

Background and 1940 Act Requirements

The Company isa closed-end management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a BDC under the 1940 Act. Section 61(a) of the 1940 Act applies asset coverage requirements which limit the ability of BDCs to incur leverage. Prior to the passage of the Small Business Credit Availability Act (the “SBCA Act”) on March 23, 2018, these asset coverage requirements prohibited a BDC from issuing debt securities or preferred stock (collectively referred to as “senior securities”) unless, immediately after such issuance, the BDC had “asset coverage” of at least 200%. For purposes of the 1940 Act, “asset coverage” means the ratio of (1) the total assets of a BDC, less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities, to (2) the aggregate amount of senior securities representing indebtedness (plus, in the case of senior securities represented by preferred stock, the aggregate involuntary liquidation preference of such BDC’s preferred stock). As a result of these historical asset coverage requirements (which limited BDCs to a 1:1debt-to-equity ratio), the Company believes that BDCs generally operate at lower levels of leverage than many private investment funds focused on similar asset classes, collateralized loan obligations, specialty finance companies and other operating companies.

The SBCA Act, among other things, amended Section 61(a) of the 1940 Act to add a new Section 61(a)(2) which reduces the asset coverage requirements applicable to BDCs from 200% to 150% (a 2:1debt-to-equity ratio), so long as the BDC meets certain disclosure and approval requirements. Section 61(a)(2) provides that before the reduced asset coverage requirements are effective with respect to a BDC, the application of that section of the 1940 Act to such BDC must be approved by either (1) a “required majority,” as defined in the Section 57(o) of the 1940 Act, of such BDC’s board of directors or (2) a majority of votes cast at a special or annual meeting of such BDC’s stockholders at which a quorum is present.

For the reasons set forth below under the header “Recommendation and Rationale,” the Board has determined to recommend that stockholders approve the Leverage Proposal because it believes that it is advisable and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders for the reduced asset coverage ratio to apply to the Company to increase the Company’s flexibility to incur additional leverage to pursue attractive investment opportunities. Therefore, the Company is seeking the approval of stockholders at the Annual Meeting to reduce the Company’s asset coverage requirements so that the reduced asset coverage requirements for senior securities in Section 61(a)(2) of the 1940 Act will apply to the Company and the Company may double the maximum amount of its permitted borrowings. Any section headers andsub-headers below “Recommendation and Rationale” are for convenience only and do not denote that the Board afforded greater or less consideration to any particular matter.

If the Leverage Proposal is approved by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting, commencing on the first date after such approval, the Company will be required to maintain asset coverage for its senior securities of 150% (i.e. $2 of debt for investment purposes outstanding for each $1 of investor equity) rather than 200% (i.e. $1 of debt for investment purposes outstanding for each $1 of investor equity), which would permit the Company to increase the maximum amount of leverage that it is permitted to incur. The Company will then be able to double the maximum amount of its permitted borrowings.

In connection with the approval of the mergers of FSIC III, FSIC IV and CCT II, other BDCs advised by the Advisor, into the Company in December 2019 (such transaction, the “Mergers”), the stockholders of the Company, FSIC III, FSIC IV and CCT II approved, on anon-binding, advisory basis, the issuance of a new class of perpetual preferred stock of the Company with an aggregate liquidation preference representing approximately 20% of the Company’s net asset value to all holders of the Company’s common stock on a pro rata basis (the “Recapitalization Transaction”). It is anticipated the shares of preferred stock will have an annual preferred dividend of 5.5%, which will accumulate from the original issue date and be paid quarterly on January 31,

32


April 30, July 31 and October 31 as declared by the Board, and in each case, will be paid prior to dividends on shares of the Company’s common stock. The preferred stock will rank senior in right of payment to shares of the Company’s common stock, will rank equal in right of payment with any other series of preferred shares the Company may issue in the future and will be subordinated in right of payment to the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ existing and future indebtedness. It is contemplated that the holders of shares of preferred stock will not have voting rights in respect of their shares of preferred stock, except that they will, voting as a separate class, be entitled to appoint two directors to the Board. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, it is expected that if the preferred stockholders have not received distributions for any two year period, the preferred stockholders shall be given the right to elect the majority of the Board. The liquidation preference of each share of preferred stock is anticipated to be $25.00 per share, and the Company expects to value the shares of preferred stock at their liquidation preference. After the five year anniversary of the Recapitalization Transaction, it is expected that the Company will be able to elect, in its discretion, to redeem the preferred stock, in whole or in part, for the liquidation preference per share of preferred stock plus accumulated and unpaid distributions satisfied through a cash payment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the terms of the preferred stock are expected to include a provision that provides that if at any time following the Recapitalization Transaction, the Board determines in good faith that the Company’s breach of the applicable asset coverage ratio requirement is imminent, the Company may redeem the preferred stock, in whole or in part, for an amount equal to the liquidation preference per share of preferred stock, plus accumulated and unpaid distributions, satisfied by either (i) a cash payment or (ii) the delivery of shares of the Company’s common stock with an aggregate net asset value equal to such amount.

If the Leverage Proposal is approved, the Company currently expects that it would incrementally increase leverage from (i) 225% to 200% (0.80x to 1.00xdebt-to-equity), with an initial target of 220% (0.85xdebt-to-equity) without giving effect to the Recapitalization Transaction and (ii) 195% to 180% (1.05x to 1.25xdebt-to-equity), with an initial target of 185% (1.10xdebt-to-equity) after giving effect to the Recapitalization Transaction.

Recommendation and Rationale

On February 20, 2020, the Board unanimously recommended that the stockholders vote in favor of the application of the reduced asset coverage requirements in Section 61(a)(2) of the 1940 Act to the Company. The Board concluded that the Leverage Proposal is in the best interests of the Company and the stockholders. In doing so, the Board considered and evaluated various factors, including the following (each, as discussed more fully below):

the ability to flexibly manage the Company following the Mergers to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities and the current composition of the Company’s portfolio;

the potential impact (both positive and negative) on net investment income, return to stockholders and net asset value;

the increased cushion to the asset coverage requirement at the initial target leverage to be utilized by the Company, particularly following the Recapitalization Transaction;

the additional risks to stockholders in light of increased leverage relative to benefits of the use of increased leverage; and

the impact on the Company’s expenses, including the increased interest payments on borrowed funds and advisory fees payable by the Company to the Advisor and the related conflicts of interest.

The Company’s investment strategy, including its strategy for selecting investments, will not change if the Leverage Proposal is approved.

33


Flexibility to manage capital to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities and the current composition of the Company’s portfolio

The Company cannot predict when attractive investment opportunities will present themselves, and attractive opportunities may arise at a time when market conditions are not favorable to raising additional equity capital. If the Company is not able to access additional capital (either at all or on favorable terms) when attractive investment opportunities arise, the Company’s ability to grow over time and to continue to pay distributions to stockholders could be adversely affected. Based on the Company’s balance sheet as of September 30, 2019, reducing the asset coverage requirements applicable to the Company from 200% (i.e. $1 of debt for investment purposes outstanding for each $1 of investor equity) to 150% (i.e. $2 of debt for investment purposes outstanding for each $1 of investor equity) would allow the Company to borrow approximately $3 billion in additional capital (or approximately $7 billion in additional capital on apro forma basis giving effect to the Mergers). This amount would provide additional flexibility to pursue attractive investment opportunities. The Board believes that the greater deal flow that may be achieved with this additional capital could enable the Company to participate more meaningfully in the private debt markets and to make larger loans to its portfolio companies with no loss of diversification of the overall portfolio, which would be in the best interest of stockholders. With more capital, the Company expects that it would, over time, likely be an even more meaningful capital provider to the middle market and be able to better compete for high-quality investment opportunities with its competitors, including other BDCs and investment funds, alternative investment vehicles (such as hedge funds) and traditional financial services companies (such as commercial banks), many of which have greater resources than the Company currently has.

Approximately 85% of the Company’s total investments at fair value were invested in senior secured debt (with approximately 70% in first lien senior secured debt) as of September 30, 2019. On a pro forma basis giving effect to the Mergers, approximately 85% of the Company’s total investments at fair value would be invested in senior secured debt (with approximately 72% in first lien senior secured debt) as of September 30, 2019. The Board noted that the Company believes that a portfolio comprised of such assets is well suited to take advantage of additional leverage.

The Board further noted that the increase in total assets available for investment as a result of incurring additional leverage would increase the assets available for investment in assetsconsidered “non-qualifying assets” for purposes of Section 55 of the 1940 Act, which will also give the Company greater flexibility when evaluating investment opportunities.

The following table sets forth the following information:

the Company’s total assets, total debt outstanding (in dollars and as a percentage of total assets), net assets and asset coverage ratio as of September 30, 2019;

assuming that as of September 30, 2019 the Company had incurred the maximum amount of borrowings that could be incurred by the Company under the currently applicable 200% asset coverage ratio, the Company’spro forma total assets, total debt outstanding (with the maximum amount of additional borrowings that would be permitted to incur in dollars and as a percentage of total assets), net assets and asset coverage ratio, in each case giving effect to the Mergers; and

assuming that as of September 30, 2019 the Company had incurred the maximum amount of borrowings that could be incurred by the Company under the proposed 150% asset coverage ratio, the Company’spro forma total assets, total debt outstanding (with the maximum amount of additional borrowings that would be permitted to incur in dollars and as a percentage of total assets), net assets and asset coverage ratio, in each case giving effect to the Mergers.

In evaluating the information presented below, it is important to recognize that the maximum amount of borrowings that could be incurred by the Company is presented for comparative and informational purposes only

34


and such information is not a representation of the amount of borrowings that the Company intends to incur or that would be available to the Company to be incurred.

      Pro Forma Amounts as of September 30,  2019
Assuming That the Company
Had Incurred the Maximum Amount of Borrowings
That Could Be Incurred by the Company
 

Selected Consolidated Financial
Statement Data (dollar amounts
in thousands)

  Actual Amounts as of
September 30, 2019(1)
  Under the Currently
Applicable 200% Minimum
Asset Coverage  Ratio(2)
  Under the Proposed 150%
Minimum Asset Coverage
Ratio(3)
 

Total Assets

  $4,445,695  $5,117,763  $7,616,518 

Total Debt Outstanding

  $1,826,687  $2,498,755  $4,997,510 

Net Assets

  $2,498,755  $2,498,755  $2,498,755 

Asset Coverage Ratio

   237  200  150

(1)

As of September 30, 2019, the Company’s total outstanding indebtedness represented 41.09% of the Company’s total assets.

(2)

Based on the Company’s total outstanding indebtedness of $1.8 billion as of September 30, 2019 and applying the currently applicable 200% minimum asset coverage ratio, the Company could have incurred up to an additional $0.7 million of borrowings. The maximum amount of additional borrowings of $0.7 million would have represented 15.1% of total assets.

(3)

Based on the Company’s total outstanding indebtedness of $1.8 billion as of September 30, 2019 and applying a 150% minimum asset coverage ratio, the Company could have incurred up to an additional $3.2 million of borrowings. The maximum amount of additional borrowings of $3.2 million would have represented 71.3% of total assets.

 

(iii)execute, monitor and service the Company’s investments;
     Pro Forma Amounts as of September 30, 2019
(i)  Giving Effect to the Mergers and
(ii) Assuming that the Combined Company
Had Incurred the Maximum Amount of Borrowings
That Could Be Incurred  by the Combined Company
 

Selected Consolidated Financial
Statement Data (dollar amounts
in thousands)

 Pro Forma Amounts as of
September 30, 2019(1)
  Under the Currently
Applicable 200% Minimum
Asset Coverage  Ratio(2)
  Under the Proposed 150%
Minimum Asset Coverage
Ratio(3)
 

Total Assets

 $8,925,099  $10,616,616  $15,714,905 

Total Debt Outstanding

 $3,406,772  $5,098,289  $10,196,578 

Net Assets

 $5,098,289  $5,098,289  $5,098,289 

Asset Coverage Ratio

  250  200  150

(1)

As of September 30, 2019, the pro forma combined company’s total outstanding indebtedness represented 38.2% of the pro forma combined company’s total assets.

(2)

Based on the pro forma combined company’s total outstanding indebtedness of $3.4 billion as of September 30, 2019 and applying the currently applicable 200% minimum asset coverage ratio, the pro forma combined company could have incurred up to an additional $1.7 million of borrowings. The maximum amount of additional borrowings of $1.7 million would have represented 19.0% of total assets.

(3)

Based on the combined company’s total outstanding indebtedness of $3.4 billion as of September 30, 2019 and applying a 150% minimum asset coverage ratio, the pro forma combined company could have incurred up to an additional $6.8 million of borrowings. The maximum amount of additional borrowings of $6.8 million would have represented 76.1% of total assets.

Potential impact on net investment income, return to stockholders and net asset value

The Board also considered the potential impact of additional leverage on the Company’s net investment income, noting that any increases would be magnified if the Company employed additional leverage. Similarly, the Board considered that, if the value of the Company’s assets increases, additional leverage could cause net asset value to increase more rapidly than it otherwise would have if the Company did not employ such additional leverage.

35


However, the Board noted that the converse was also true and, if the Company’s net investment income or the value of the Company’s assets decreased, additional leverage would cause the Company’s net investment income and/or net asset value to decline more sharply than it otherwise would have if the Company did not employ such additional leverage, increasing the risk of investing in the Company’s common stock. In addition, the Company would have to service any additional debt that it incurs, including interest expense on debt and dividends on preferred stock, that the Company may issue, as well as the fees and costs related to the entry into or amendments to debt facilities. These expenses would decrease net investment income, and the Company’s ability to pay such expenses will depend largely on the Company’s financial performance and will be subject to prevailing economic conditions and competitive pressures. Additionally, certain of the Company’s financing arrangements, including the Company’s senior revolving credit facility, currently contain a covenant limiting the Company’s asset coverage to 200% and may need to be amended if stockholders approve the Leverage Proposal. The Company may not be able to amend such financing arrangements to change this covenant and if the Company is successful in amending its financing arrangements, it may incur costs to do so and the other terms of such amended financing arrangements, such as the interest rate, may not be as favorable to the Company as the current terms.

Effect of Leverage on Return to Stockholders

The following table illustrates, on an actual basis without giving effect to the Mergers, the effect of leverage on returns from an investment in the Company’s common stock assuming that the Company employs (1) its actual asset coverage ratio as of September 30, 2019, (2) a hypothetical asset coverage ratio of 200% and (3) a hypothetical asset coverage ratio of 150%, each at various annual returns on the Company’s portfolio as of September 30, 2019, net of expenses.The calculations in the table below are hypothetical, and actual returns may be significantly higher or lower than those appearing in the table below.

Assumed Return on the Company’s Portfolio (Net of Expenses)

 (10.00)% (5.00)% 0.00% 5.00% 10.00%
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corresponding return to common stockholder assuming actual asset coverage as of September 30, 2019 (237%)(1)

 (21.3)% (12.5)% (3.7)% 5.1% 13.9%

Corresponding return to common stockholder assuming 200% asset coverage(2)

 (25.6)% (15.4)% (5.2)% 5.1% 15.3%

Corresponding return to common stockholder assuming 150% asset coverage(3)

 (40.7)% (25.5)% (10.3)% 4.9% 20.1%

 

(1)

13Based on (i) $4.4 billion in total assets including debt issuance costs as of September 30, 2019, (ii) $1.8 billion in outstanding indebtedness as of September 30, 2019, (iii) $2.5 billion in net assets as of September 30, 2019 and (iv) a weighted average interest rate on the Company’s indebtedness, as of September 30, 2019, excluding fees (such as fees on undrawn amounts and amortization of financing costs), of 5.15%.

(2)

Based on (i) $5.1 billion in total assets including debt issuance costs on a pro forma basis as of September 30, 2019, after giving effect of a hypothetical asset coverage ratio of 200%, (ii) $2.5 billion in outstanding indebtedness on a pro forma basis as of September 30, 2019, after giving effect of a hypothetical asset coverage ratio of 200%, (iii) $2.5 billion in net assets as of September 30, 2019 and (iv) a weighted average interest rate on the Company’s indebtedness, as of September 30, 2019, excluding fees (such as fees on undrawn amounts and amortization of financing costs), of 5.15%.

(3)

Based on (i) $7.6 billion in total assets including debt issuance costs on a pro forma basis as of September 30, 2019, after giving effect of a hypothetical asset coverage ratio of 150%, (ii) $5.0 billion in outstanding indebtedness on a pro forma basis as of September 30, 2019, after giving effect of a hypothetical asset coverage ratio of 150%, (iii) $2.5 billion in net assets as of September 30, 2019 and (iv) a weighted average interest rate on the Company’s indebtedness, as of September 30, 2019, excluding fees (such as fees on undrawn amounts and amortization of financing costs), of 5.15%.

The following table illustrates, on apro forma basis giving effect to the Mergers, the effect of leverage on returns from an investment on the combined company’s common stock assuming that the Company employs

36


(iv)place orders with respect to, and arrange for, any investment by the Company;

(1) its actual asset coverage ratio as of September 30, 2019, (2) a hypothetical pro forma asset coverage ratio of 200% and (3) a hypothetical pro forma asset coverage ratio of 150%, each at various annual returns on the combined company’s pro forma portfolio as of September 30, 2019, net of expenses.The calculations in the table below and in the corresponding footnotes are calculated on a pro forma basis assuming the Mergers are completed and are hypothetical. Actual returns may be significantly higher or lower than those appearing in the table below.

Assumed Return on the combined company’s portfolio (Net of Expenses)

 (10.00)% (5.00)% 0.00% 5.00% 10.00%
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corresponding return to common stockholder assuming actual asset coverage as of September 30, 2019 (250%)(1)

 (20.9)% (12.1)% (3.4)% 5.3% 14.1%

Corresponding return to common stockholder assuming 200% asset coverage(2)

 (25.9)% (15.5)% (5.1)% 5.3% 15.7%

Corresponding return to common stockholder assuming 150% asset coverage(3)

 (41.0)% (25.6)% (10.2)% 5.2% 20.6%

(1)

Based on (i) $8.9 billion in total assets including debt issuance costs as of September 30, 2019, (ii) $3.4 billion in outstanding indebtedness as of September 30, 2019, (iii) $5.1 billion in net assets as of September 30, 2019 and (iv) a weighted average interest rate on the combined company’s indebtedness, as of September 30, 2019, excluding fees (such as fees on undrawn amounts and amortization of financing costs), of 5.10%.

(2)

Based on (i) $10.6 billion in total assets including debt issuance costs on a pro forma basis as of September 30, 2019, after giving effect of a hypothetical asset coverage ratio of 200%, (ii) $5.1 billion in outstanding indebtedness on a pro forma basis as of September 30, 2019, after giving effect of a hypothetical asset coverage ratio of 200%, (iii) $5.1 billion in net assets as of September 30, 2019 and (iv) a weighted average interest rate on the combined company’s indebtedness, as of September 30, 2019, excluding fees (such as fees on undrawn amounts and amortization of financing costs), of 5.10%.

(3)

Based on (i) $15.7 billion in total assets including debt issuance costs on a pro forma basis as of September 30, 2019, after giving effect of a hypothetical asset coverage ratio of 150%, (ii) $10.2 billion in outstanding indebtedness on a pro forma basis as of September 30, 2019, after giving effect of a hypothetical asset coverage ratio of 150%, (iii) 5.1 billion in net assets as of September 30, 2019 and (iv) a weighted average interest rate on the combined company’s indebtedness, as of September 30, 2019, excluding fees (such as fees on undrawn amounts and amortization of financing costs), of 5.10%.

Effect of Leverage on Expenses

The following tables are intended to assist stockholders in understanding the fees and expenses that an investor in the Company’s common stock will bear, directly or indirectly, assuming that the Company employs (1) its actual asset coverage ratio and actual annual base management fee rate as of September 30, 2019, (2) a hypothetical asset coverage ratio of 200% and the actual annual base management fee rate as of September 30, 2019 and (3) a hypothetical asset coverage ratio of 150% and the reduction in the annual base management fee payable to the Advisor from 1.5% to 1.0% on all assets financed using leverage over 1.0xdebt-to-equity under the Investment Advisory Agreement. The “FSIC II Standalone Estimated Fees and Expenses” table presents the fees and expenses on an actual basis without giving effect to the Mergers, and the “Combined Company Estimated Fees and Expenses” table is presented on apro forma basis giving effect to the Mergers.

The Company cautions that some of the percentages indicated in the tables below are estimates and may vary. The expenses shown in the tables are based on estimated amounts for the current fiscal year.The following tables should not be considered a representation of the Company’s future expenses. Actual expenses may be significantly greater or less than shown.

 

(v)determine the securities and other assets

37


FSIC II Standalone Estimated Fees and Expenses

Estimated Annual Expenses

(as percentage of net assets attributable to common  stock)

  Actual asset
coverage as of
September 30, 2019
(237%)(1)
  200% asset
coverage(2)
  150% asset
coverage(3)
 

Base management fees(4)

   2.64  3.04  4.01

Incentive fees(5)

   1.30  2.18  3.84

Interest payments on borrowed funds(6)

   4.13  5.48  10.52

Other expenses(7)

   0.48  0.48  0.48

Acquired fund fees and expenses

   0.00  0.00  0.00

Total annual expenses

   8.55  11.18  18.85

(1)

Expenses for the “Actual asset coverage as of September 30, 2019 (237%)” column are based on actual expenses incurred for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, on an annualized basis.

(2)

Expenses for the “200% asset coverage” column are based on pro forma expenses for the period for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, on an annualized basis, which assume a hypothetical asset coverage ratio of 200%. The maximum amount of borrowings that could be incurred by the Company is presented for comparative and informational purposes only and such information is not a representation of the amount of borrowings that the Company intends to incur or that would be available to the Company shall purchase, retain, or sell;

(vi)perform due diligence on prospective portfolio companies; and

(vii)provide the Company with such other investment advisory, research and related services as the Company may, from time to time, reasonably request or require for the investment of its funds.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, FSIC II Advisor and KKR Credit may, from time to time, designate one or the other as being primarily responsible for certain investments. The duties to be provided underincurred.

(3)

Expenses for the FSIC II Advisor InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement“150% asset coverage” column are substantiallybased on pro forma expenses for the same as those underperiod for the Current Investment Advisory Agreement. FSIC II Advisor has no obligation to supervise KKR Credit’s provisionnine months ended September 30, 2019, on an annualized basis, which assume a hypothetical asset coverage ratio of services under150% and the KKR InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement.

Fees and Expenses.The Company will pay FSIC II Advisor a fee for its services underreduction in the FSIC II Advisor InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement consisting of two components—an annual base management fee basedfrom 1.5% to 1.0% on all assets financed using leverage over1.0x debt-to-equity under the Investment Advisory Agreement. The maximum amount of borrowings that could be incurred by the Company is presented for comparative and informational purposes only and such information is not a representation of the amount of borrowings that the Company intends to incur or that would be available to the Company to be incurred.

(4)

For the “200% asset coverage” and “150% asset coverage” columns, the Company’s base management fee is calculated at an annual rate of 1.50% and 1.34%, respectively, of the average weekly value of the Company’s gross assets excluding cash or cash equivalents. For purposes of the “200% asset coverage” and “150% asset coverage” columns, the table assumes average weekly gross assets of $5.1 billion and $7.6 billion, respectively. See “Impact on advisory fees paid by the Company” below.

(5)

For purposes of the “200% asset coverage” column, the table above assumes average weekly gross assets of $5.1 billion, total debt of $2.5 billion, interest income calculated by applying the ratio of annualized “total investment income” for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, on an incentive fee basedannualized basis to the “investments, at fair value” as of September 30, 2019 to the pro forma assets as of September 30, 2019 and (iv) interest expense on incremental pro forma leverage of 5.15%, which was the weighted average interest rate on the Company’s performance.indebtedness as of September 30, 2019. For purposes of the “150% asset coverage” column, the table above assumes average gross assets of $7.6 billion, total debt of $5.0 billion, interest income calculated by applying the ratio of annualized “total investment income” for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, on an annualized basis to the “investments, at fair value” as of September 30, 2019 to the pro forma assets as of September 30, 2019 and (iv) interest expense on incremental pro forma leverage of 5.15%, which was the weighted average interest rate on the Company’s indebtedness as of September 30, 2019. See “Impact on advisory fees paid by the Company” below.

(6)

As of September 30, 2019, the Company’s indebtedness bore a weighted average interest rate of 5.15%. For purposes of the “200% asset coverage” column, the table above assumes total debt outstanding of $2.5 billion (the maximum amount of borrowings that could be incurred by the Company under the current 200% asset coverage requirement as of September 30, 2019). For purposes of the “150% asset coverage” column, the table above assumes total debt outstanding of $5.0 billion (the maximum amount of borrowings that could be incurred by the Company under the proposed 150% asset coverage requirement as of September 30, 2019).

38


(7)

“Other Expenses” include accounting, legal and auditing fees and excise and state taxes, as well as the reimbursement of the compensation of administrative personnel and fees payable to the Company’s directors who do not also serve in an executive officer capacity for the Company or the Advisor. The costamount presented in the table reflects actual amounts incurred for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, on an annualized basis.

Combined Company Estimated Fees and Expenses

Estimated Annual Expenses

(as percentage of net assets attributable to common  stock)

  Pro Forma asset
coverage as of
September 30,  2019
(250%)(1)
  200% asset
coverage(2)
  150% asset
coverage(3)
 

Base management fees(4)

   2.62  3.12  4.12

Incentive fees(5)

   2.07  2.42  3.49

Interest payments on borrowed funds(6)

   3.78  5.47  10.57

Other expenses(7)

   0.59  0.59  0.59

Acquired fund fees and expenses

   0.00  0.00  0.00

Total annual expenses

   9.06  11.60  18.77

(1)

Expenses for the “Pro forma asset coverage as of bothSeptember 30, 2019 (250%)” column are based on pro forma expenses incurred for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, on an annualized basis.

(2)

Expenses for the “200% asset coverage” column are based on pro forma expenses for the period for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, on an annualized basis, which assume a hypothetical asset coverage ratio of 200%. The maximum amount of borrowings that could be incurred by the Company is presented for comparative and informational purposes only and such information is not a representation of the amount of borrowings that the Company intends to incur or that would be available to the Company to be incurred.

(3)

Expenses for the “150% asset coverage” column are based on pro forma expenses for the period for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, on an annualized basis, which assume a hypothetical asset coverage ratio of 150% and the reduction in the annual base management fee payablefrom 1.5% to FSIC II Advisor and any incentive fees it earns will ultimately1.0% on all assets financed using leverage over1.0x debt-to-equity under the Investment Advisory Agreement. The maximum amount of borrowings that could be borneincurred by the Company is presented for comparative and informational purposes only and such information is not a representation of the amount of borrowings that the Company intends to incur or that would be available to the Company to be incurred.

(4)

For the “200% asset coverage” and “150% asset coverage” columns, the Company’s stockholders.

The base management fee will beis calculated at an annual rate of 0.75%1.50% and 1.34%, respectively, of the average weekly value of the Company’s gross assets. The base management fee will be payable quarterly in arrearsassets excluding cash or cash equivalents. For purposes of the “200% asset coverage” and will be calculated based on“150% asset coverage” columns, the table assumes average weekly valuegross assets of $10.6 billion and $15.7 billion, respectively. See “Impact on advisory fees paid by the Company” below.

(5)

For purposes of the Company’s“200% asset coverage” column, the table above assumes average weekly gross assets duringof $10.6 billion, total debt of $5.1 billion, interest income calculated by applying the most recently completed calendar quarter. The base management fee may or may not be taken in whole or in part at the discretionratio of FSIC II Advisor. All or any part of the base management fee not taken as to any quarter will be deferred without interest and may be taken in such other quarter as FSIC II Advisor shall determine. The base management fee for any partial month or quarter will be appropriately prorated. The other terms of the base management fee are the same as those under the Current Investment Advisory Agreement.

The incentive fee will consist of two parts. The first part of the incentive fee, which is referred to as the subordinated incentive fee on income, will be calculated and payable quarterly in arrears, will equal 10.0% of the Company’s“pre-incentive fee netannualized pro forma “total investment income” for the immediately preceding quarter and will be subject to a hurdle rate, expressed as a rate of returnnine months ended September 30, 2019, on adjusted capital, equal to 1.75% per quarter, or an annualized hurdlebasis to the pro forma “investments, at fair value” as of September 30, 2019 to the pro forma assets as of September 30, 2019 and (iv) interest expense on incremental pro forma leverage of 5.10%, which was the pro forma weighted average interest rate on the Company’s indebtedness as of 7.0%.September 30, 2019. For purposes of this fee, “adjusted capital” means cumulative gross proceeds generated from sales of the Shares (including proceeds from“150% asset coverage” column, the Company’s distribution reinvestment plan) reduced for amounts paid for Share repurchases pursuant to the Company’s Share repurchase program. As a result, FSIC II Advisor will not earn this incentive fee for any quarter until the Company’spre-incentive fee net investment income for such quarter exceeds the hurdle rate of 1.75%. Once the Company’spre-incentive fee net investment income in any quarter exceeds the hurdle rate, FSIC II Advisor will be entitled to a“catch-up” fee equal to 50% of the amount of the Company’spre-incentive fee net investment income in excess of the hurdle rate, until the Company’spre-incentive fee net investment income for such quarter equals 2.1875%, or 8.75% annually, of adjusted capital. This“catch-up” feature will allow FSIC II Advisor to recoup the fees foregone as a result of the existence of the hurdle rate. Thereafter, FSIC II Advisor will be entitled to receive 10.0% of the Company’spre-incentive fee net investment income.

The second part of the incentive fee, which is referred to as the incentive fee on capital gains, will be determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements). This fee will equal (i) 10.0% of the Company’s “incentive fee capital gains” (i.e., the Company’s realized capital gains on a cumulative basis from inception, calculated as of the end of the applicable period, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis), less (ii) 50.0% of the aggregate amount of any previously paid incentive fees on capital gains. The Company will accrue for the incentive fee on capital gains, which, if earned, will be paid annually. The Company will accrue

14


the incentive fee on capital gains based on net realized and unrealized gains; however, under the terms of the FSIC II Advisor InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement, the fee payable to FSIC II Advisor will be based on realized gains and no such fee will be payable with respect to unrealized gains unless and until such gains are actually realized. The other terms of the incentive fee are the same as those under the Current Investment Advisory Agreement.

All personnel of FSIC II Advisor, when and to the extent engaged in providing advisory services under the FSIC II Advisor Investment Co-Advisory Agreement, and the compensation of such personnel allocable to such advisory services, shall be provided and paid for by FSIC II Advisor or its affiliates and not by the Company. The treatment of expenses is the same under the Current Investment Advisory Agreement.

Term. The FSIC II Advisor InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement will remain in effect initially for two years, and thereafter will continue automatically for successive annual periods, provided that such continuance is specifically approved at least annually by (i) the vote of the Board, or by the vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Company and (ii) the vote of a majority of the Independent Directors in accordance with the requirements of the 1940 Act. The FSIC II Advisor InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement may be terminated at any time, without the payment of any penalty, upon 60 days’ written notice (a) by the Company to FSIC II Advisor, (i) upon the vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Company (within the meaning of Section 2(a)(42) of the 1940 Act), or (ii) by the vote of the Independent Directors, or (b) by FSIC II Advisor to the Company. The FSIC II Advisor InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement will automatically terminate in the event of (x) its “assignment” (as such term is defined for purposes of Section 15(a)(4) of the 1940 Act), or (y) the effectiveness of the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement.

Indemnification.The FSIC II Advisor InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement provides that FSIC II Advisor and anysub-adviser (and their officers, managers, partners, members (and their members, including the owners of their members), agents, employees, controlling persons (as defined in the 1940 Act) and any other person or entity affiliated with, or acting on behalf of, FSIC II Advisor or any suchsub-adviser) (collectively, the “FSIC II Advisor Indemnified Parties”), will not be liable to the Company for any action taken or omitted to be taken by any such FSIC II Advisor Indemnified Party in connection with the performance of any of its duties or obligations under the FSIC II Advisor InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement or otherwise as an investment adviser of the Company (except to the extent specified in Section 36(b) of the 1940 Act concerning loss resulting from a breach of fiduciary duty (as the same is finally determined by judicial proceedings) with respect to the receipt of compensation for services), and the Company will indemnify, defend and protect the FSIC II Advisor Indemnified Parties (each of whom shall be deemed a third party beneficiary thereof) and hold them harmless from and against all damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) (“Losses”) incurred by the FSIC II Advisor Indemnified Parties in or by reason of any pending, threatened or completed action, suit, investigation or other proceeding (including an action or suit by or in the right of the Company or its security holders) arising out of or otherwise based upon the performance of any of FSIC II Advisor’s duties or obligations under the FSIC II Advisor InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement or otherwise as an investment adviser of the Company, to the extent such Losses are not fully reimbursed by insurance, and to the extent that such indemnification would not be inconsistent with the laws of the State of Maryland or other applicable law, the Company’s Articles of Amendment and Restatement or, for only as long as the Shares are not listed on a national securities exchange, the provisions of Section II.G of the Omnibus Guidelines published by the North American Securities Administrators Association on March 29, 1992, as it may be amended from time to time. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, nothing contained in the FSIC II Advisor InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement will protect or be deemed to protect the FSIC II Advisor Indemnified Parties against or entitle or be deemed to entitle the FSIC II Advisor Indemnified Parties to indemnification in respect of any Losses to the Company or its stockholders to which the FSIC II Advisor Indemnified Parties would otherwise be subject by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of FSIC II Advisor’s duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of FSIC II Advisor’s duties and obligations under the FSIC II Advisor InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement.

15


Brand Usage. The FSIC II Advisor InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement provides, subject to certain limitations, that FSIC II Advisor grants anon-exclusive,non-transferrable,non-sublicensable and royalty-free license to the Company for use of the trademark “FSIC II Advisor” and the “FSIC II Advisor” design in connection with the Company’s public filings, requests for information from state and federal regulators, offering materials and advertising materials and investor communications.

Third Party Beneficiaries.The FSIC II Advisor InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement provides that except for any FSIC II Advisor Indemnified Party, the FSIC II Advisor InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement is for the sole benefit of the parties thereto and their permitted assigns.

Insurance. The FSIC II Advisor InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement provides that, subject to the requirements of Rule17d-1(d)(7) under the 1940 Act, the Company shall acquire and maintain a directors and officers liability insurance policy or similar policy with reasonable coverage from a reputable insurer.

Terms of the KKR InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement

The terms of the KKR InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement are substantially similar to those of the Current Investment Advisory Agreement, except for, among other things, the fees payable thereunder, the name of the investment adviser and the date of effectiveness. Furthermore, the terms of the KKR InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement are substantially similar to those of the FSIC II Advisor InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement. The description of the KKR InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement that follows is a summary only and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the copy of the form of the KKR InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement included in Exhibit B hereto.

Duties.Subject to the overall supervision of the Board, KKR Credit, in coordination with FSIC II Advisor, will oversee the Company’sday-to-day operations and provide the Company with investment advisory services. Under the terms of the KKR InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement, KKR Credit will, in coordination with FSIC II Advisor:

(i)determine the composition and allocation of the Company’s investment portfolio, the nature and timing of any changes therein and the manner of implementing such changes;

(ii)identify, evaluate and negotiate the structure of the investments made by the Company;

(iii)execute, monitor and service the Company’s investments;

(iv)place orders with respect to, and arrange for, any investment by the Company;

(v)determine the securities and other assets that the Company shall purchase, retain, or sell;

(vi)perform due diligence on prospective portfolio companies; and

(vii)provide the Company with such other investment advisory, research and related services as the Company may, from time to time, reasonably request or require for the investment of its funds.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, FSIC II Advisor and KKR Credit may, from time to time, designate one or the other as being primarily responsible for certain investments. The duties to be provided under the KKR InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement are substantially the same as those under the Current Investment Advisory Agreement. KKR Credit has no obligation to supervise FSIC II Advisor’s provision of services under the FSIC II Advisor InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement.

Fees and Expenses.The Company will pay KKR Credit a fee for its services under the KKR InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement consisting of two components—an annual base management fee based on thetable above assumes average weekly value of the Company’s gross assets and an incentive fee based onof $15.7 billion, total debt of $10.2 billion, interest income calculated by applying the Company’s performance. The costratio of both the base management fee payable to KKR Credit and any incentive fees it earns will ultimately be borne by the Company’s stockholders.

16


The base management fee will be calculated at an annual rate of 0.75% of the average weekly value of the Company’s gross assets. The base management fee will be payable quarterly in arrears and will be calculated based on the average weekly value of the Company’s gross assets during the most recently completed calendar quarter. The base management fee may or may not be taken in whole or in part at the discretion of KKR Credit. All or any part of the base management fee not taken as to any quarter will be deferred without interest and may be taken in such other quarter as KKR Credit shall determine. The base management fee for any partial month or quarter will be appropriately prorated. The other terms of the base management fee are the same as those under the Current Investment Advisory Agreement.

The incentive fee will consist of two parts. The first part of the incentive fee, which is referred to as the subordinated incentive fee on income, will be calculated and payable quarterly in arrears, will equal 10.0% of the Company’s“pre-incentive fee netannualized pro forma “total investment income” for the immediately preceding quarter and will be subject to a hurdle rate, expressed as a rate of returnnine months ended September 30, 2019, on adjusted capital, equal to 1.75% per quarter, or an annualized hurdle rate of 7.0%. For purposes of this fee, “adjusted capital” means cumulative gross proceeds generated from sales of the Shares (including proceeds from the Company’s distribution reinvestment plan) reduced for amounts paid for Share repurchases pursuantbasis to the Company’s Share repurchase program. As a result, KKR Credit will not earn this incentive fee for any quarter until the Company’spre-incentive fee net investment income for such quarter exceeds the hurdle rate of 1.75%. Once the Company’spre-incentive fee net investment income in any quarter exceeds the hurdle rate, KKR Credit will be entitled to a“catch-up” fee equal to 50% of the amount of the Company’spre-incentive fee net investment income in excess of the hurdle rate, until the Company’spre-incentive fee net investment income for such quarter equals 2.1875%, or 8.75% annually, of adjusted capital. This“catch-up” feature will allow KKR Credit to recoup the fees foregone as a result of the existence of the hurdle rate. Thereafter, KKR Credit will be entitled to receive 10.0% of the Company’spre-incentive fee net investment income.

The second part of the incentive fee, which is referred to as the incentive fee on capital gains, will be determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements). This fee will equal (i) 10.0% of the Company’s “incentive fee capital gains” (i.e., the Company’s realized capital gains on a cumulative basis from inception, calculated as of the end of the applicable period, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis), less (ii) 50.0% of the aggregate amount of any previously paid incentive fees on capital gains. The Company will accrue for the incentive fee on capital gains, which, if earned, will be paid annually. The Company will accrue the incentive fee on capital gains based on net realized and unrealized gains; however, under the terms of the KKR InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement, the fee payable to KKR Credit will be based on realized gains and no such fee will be payable with respect to unrealized gains unless and until such gains are actually realized. The other terms of the incentive fee are the same as those under the Current Investment Advisory Agreement.

All personnel of KKR Credit, when and to the extent engaged in providing services under the KKR Investment Co- Advisory Agreement, and the compensation and routine overhead expenses of such personnel allocable to such services, shall be provided and paid for by KKR Credit or its affiliates and not by the Company. The treatment of expenses is the same under the Current Investment Advisory Agreement.

Term. The KKR InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement will remain in effect initially for two years, and thereafter will continue automatically for successive annual periods, provided that such continuance is specifically approvedpro forma “investments, at least annually by (i) the vote of the Board, or by the vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Company and (ii) the vote of a majority of the Independent Directors in accordance with the requirements of the 1940 Act. The KKR InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement may be terminated at any time, without the payment of any penalty, upon 60 days’ written notice (a) by the Company to KKR Credit, (i) upon the vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Company (within the meaning of Section 2(a)(42) of the 1940 Act), or (ii) by the vote of the Independent Directors, or (b) by KKR Credit to the Company. The KKR InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement will automatically terminate in the event of (x) its “assignment” (as such term is defined for purposes of Section 15(a)(4) of the 1940 Act), or (y) the effectiveness of the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement.

17


Indemnification.The KKR InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement provides that KKR Credit and anysub-adviser (and their officers, managers, partners, members (and their members, including the owners of their members), agents, employees, controlling persons (as defined in the 1940 Act) and any other person or entity affiliated with, or acting on behalf of, KKR Credit or any suchsub-adviser) (collectively, the “KKR Indemnified Parties”), will not be liable to the Company for any action taken or omitted to be taken by any such KKR Indemnified Party in connection with the performance of any of its duties or obligations under the KKR InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement or otherwise as an investment adviser of the Company (except to the extent specified in Section 36(b) of the 1940 Act concerning loss resulting from a breach of fiduciary duty (as the same is finally determined by judicial proceedings) with respect to the receipt of compensation for services), and the Company will indemnify, defend and protect the KKR Indemnified Parties (each of whom shall be deemed a third party beneficiary thereof) and hold them harmless from and against all Losses incurred by the KKR Indemnified Parties in or by reason of any pending, threatened or completed action, suit, investigation or other proceeding (including an action or suit by or in the right of the Company or its security holders) arising out of or otherwise based upon the performance of any of KKR Credit’s duties or obligations under the KKR InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement or otherwise as an investment adviser of the Company, to the extent such Losses are not fully reimbursed by insurance, and to the extent that such indemnification would not be inconsistent with the laws of the State of Maryland or other applicable law, the Company’s Articles of Amendment and Restatement or, for only as long as the Shares are not listed on a national securities exchange, the provisions of Section II.G of the Omnibus Guidelines published by the North American Securities Administrators Association on March 29, 1992, as it may be amended from time to time. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, nothing contained in the KKR InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement will protect or be deemed to protect the KKR Indemnified Parties against or entitle or be deemed to entitle the KKR Indemnified Parties to indemnification in respect of any Losses to the Company or its stockholders to which the KKR Indemnified Parties would otherwise be subject by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of KKR Credit’s duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of KKR Credit’s duties and obligations under the KKR InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement.

Brand Usage. The KKR InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement provides, subject to certain limitations, that KKR Credit grants anon-exclusive,non-transferrable,non-sublicensable and royalty-free license to the Company for use of the trademark “KKR” and the “KKR” design in connection with the Company’s public filings, requests for information from state and federal regulators, offering materials and advertising materials and investor communications.

Third Party Beneficiaries.The KKR InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement provides that except for KKR Indemnified Party, the KKR InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement is for the sole benefit of the parties thereto and their permitted assigns.

Insurance. The KKR Advisor InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement provides that, subject to the requirements of Rule17d-1(d)(7) under the 1940 Act, the Company shall acquire and maintain a directors and officers liability insurance policy or similar policy with reasonable coverage from a reputable insurer.

Board Consideration

At a meeting of the Board held on November 28, 2017, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Directors, approved each of the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements as being in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. The Board then directed that both InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements be submitted to the Company’s stockholders for approval with the Board’s recommendation that the stockholders of the Company vote to approve the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements.

The InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Proposal and the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal are not contingent on one another. However, if the stockholders of the Company do not approve both the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Proposal and the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement

18


Proposal, then the Board will consider and evaluate its options to determine what alternatives are in the Company’s best interests and that of the Company’s stockholders.

Factors Considered by the Board

The Board, in approving and recommending stockholder approval of each InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement, considered information furnished and discussed throughout the year at Board meetings and executive sessions with management and counsel and provided specifically in relation to the consideration of the approval of the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements in response to requests of the Independent Directors and their independent legal counsel.

In its deliberations, the Board considered (i) a range of materials and information regarding the nature and quality of services to be provided by FSIC II Advisor and KKR Credit, (ii) the past performance of FSIC II Advisor and performance of the Company compared to relevant indices and peer funds, (iii) the performance of funds advised by KKR Credit that are comparable in strategy to the Company, (iv) the proposed fees and expenses of the Company under the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements compared to the Company’s current fees and those of peer funds with investment objectives and strategies similar to the Company, and (v) the estimated profitability of FSIC II Advisor and KKR Credit under the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements. The Board also considered information related to potential “fall out” or ancillary benefits enjoyed by FSIC II Advisor and to be enjoyed by KKR Credit (and their affiliates) as a result of their relationships with the Company. In addition, the Board explored alternative options, including other investment advisory arrangements. In addition to evaluating, among other things, the written information provided by FSIC II Advisor and KKR Credit, the Board considered the answers to questions posed by the Board to representatives of FSIC II Advisor and KKR Credit at various meetings. The Independent Directors met separately in executive sessions with their independent legal counsel to review and consider the information provided regarding the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements.

Based on their review, the Independent Directors and the full Board concluded that it was in the best interests of the Company to approve the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements. In its deliberations, the Board did not identify any single factor or group of factors asall-important or controlling, but considered all factors together. The material factors and conclusions that formed the basis for the Board’s determinations are discussed below.

Nature, Extent and Quality of Services. In evaluating the nature, extent and quality of the services to be provided by FSIC II Advisor and KKR Credit, the Board reviewed information describing the financial strength, experience, resources, compliance programs, and key personnel of FSIC II Advisor and KKR Credit, including the personnel who will provide investment management services to the Company. With respect to FSIC II Advisor, the Board considered (i) its overall experience overseeing the activities of FSIC II Advisor with regard to the operation of the Company to date and recognized the investment of time, capital and human resources that has resulted in the successful operation of the Company, and (ii) FSIC II Advisor’s role in, among other things, setting investment guidelines for the Company’s portfolio, determining the composition and allocation of the Company’s portfolio, and identifying, evaluating, and negotiating the structure of, the Company’s investments. The Board also considered the administrative services FSIC II Advisor provides to the Company, including general ledger accounting, fund accounting, legal services, investor relations and other administrative services. With respect to KKR Credit, the Board considered KKR Credit’s ability to, among other things, (i) identify and conduct due diligence on prospective investment opportunities for the Company, (ii) make and execute investments for the Company, (iii) implement the Company’s investment strategies, and (iv) provide ongoing monitoring of the Company’s investments. The Board also considered the anticipated strong level of proposed collaboration and coordination between FSIC II Advisor and KKR Credit in managing the Company’s assets.

The Board and the Independent Directors determined that they were satisfied with the nature, quality and extent of the services to be provided by FSIC II Advisor and KKR Credit to the Company, the expertise and

19


capabilities of FSIC II Advisor’s and KKR Credit’s personnel, FSIC II Advisor’s and KKR Credit’s financial strength and their anticipated allocation of resources necessary to manage the Company’s portfolio.

Review of Performance. With respect to the Company’s investment performance, the Board and the Independent Directors noted that the Company’s performance was reasonable as compared to the performance of funds that FSIC II Advisor believed to be relatively comparable to the Company in terms of structure, investment objectives, assets under management, portfolio mix and/or similar criteria. In addition, the Independent Directors considered the Company’s performance compared to certain indices spanning the spectrum of primary asset classes in which the Company invests. The Independent Directors noted FSIC II Advisor’s explanation of the relevance of each comparable index. The Board then considered the performance of funds managed by KKR Credit that are comparable to the Company. The Board determined that it was generally satisfied with the Company’s and KKR Credit’s performance and would continue to monitor the Company’s performance results.

Costs of Services Provided and Profits Realized. The Board considered the proposed management and incentive fees (together, the “Advisory Fees”) and the Company’s anticipated expense ratios as compared to a group of investment companies that FSIC II Advisor believed to be relatively comparable to the Company in terms of structure, investment objectives, assets under management, portfolio mix and/or similar criteria. The Independent Directors considered that the base management fee portion of the Advisory Fees would be reduced under the proposed arrangements, which would cause stockholders to pay a decreased Advisory Fee, but that the income incentive fee hurdle would be lowered (as described above), potentially causing the Company to reach the hurdle at a lower performance rate (and consequently, stockholders would pay the income incentive fee at a lower performance rate) than it would have under the current fee structure. The Independent Directors considered the reasons for the changes in Advisory Fees provided by FSIC II Advisor, the comparison of the Company’s proposed Advisory Fees to its peers, including that the reduced hurdle rate would substantially align with the hurdle rates of the Company’s peers.

With respect to the Company’s expense ratios, the Board considered the expense ratios compared to a group of investment companies that FSIC II Advisor believed to be relatively comparable to the Company in terms of structure, investment objectives, assets under management, portfolio mix and/or similar criteria. The Board reviewed the profitability information provided by FSIC II Advisor for the past three years, the estimated profitability after the proposed approval of the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements and FSIC II Advisor’s methodology for determining profitability. The Independent Directors also noted KKR Credit’s expected profitability and methodology with respect to the Company. The Board determined that the Advisory Fees, proposed expense ratios and profitability were reasonable in relation to the services to be rendered to the Company by FSIC II Advisor and KKR Credit.

Economies of Scale. The Board considered the extent to which economies of scale might be realized as the Company grows and whether the Company’s fee levels reflect these economies of scale for the benefit of Company stockholders. The Board considered the fact that such economies are less likely to be significant given the Company’s structure and focus on loans to private middle-market U.S. companies which generally require loan by loan negotiation and monitoring, as well as FSIC II Advisor’s commitment to monitor economies of scale on an ongoing basis.

Other Benefits. The Board considered other benefits that may accrue to FSIC II Advisor, KKR Credit and their affiliates from their relationships with the Company, including that FSIC II Advisor and KKR Credit may potentially benefit from the success of the Company, which could attract other business to FSIC II Advisor and KKR Credit.

Overall Conclusions. Based on all of the information considered and the conclusions reached, the Board determined that the terms of the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements are fair and reasonable and that the approval of each InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement is in the best interests of the Company. The Board, including a majority of the Independent Directors, unanimously approved the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements and determined to submit the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements to stockholders for approval.

20


Vote Required

The affirmative vote by the stockholders of the Company holding a majority of the outstanding voting securities is necessary for approval of each InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement. The 1940 Act defines “a majority of outstanding voting securities” of the Company as the lesser of: (1) 67% or more of the voting securities present at the Special Meeting if the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of the Company are present or represented by proxy; or (2) more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of the Company. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will not count as affirmative votes cast and will therefore have the same effect as votes “AGAINST” the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Proposal. Proxies received will be voted “FOR” the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Proposal unless stockholders designate otherwise.

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE INVESTMENTCO-ADVISORY AGREEMENTS PROPOSAL.

21


PROPOSAL 2: APPROVAL OF JOINT ADVISOR INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT PROPOSAL

Background

The information set forth under the heading “Background” in “Proposal 1: Approval of InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Proposal” is incorporated herein by reference.

About the Joint Advisor

The Joint Advisor will be a newly-formed Delaware limited liability company, located at 201 Rouse Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19112. Prior to the effectiveness of the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement, the Joint Advisor will register as an investment adviser with the SEC under the Advisers Act. The Joint Advisor will be formed by FS Investments or one of its affiliates to serve as the Company’s investment adviser. Upon receipt of Exemptive Relief, stockholder approval of the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement and, unless otherwise waived by KKR Credit and the FS Advisor Entities, stockholder approval of each investment advisory agreement between the Joint Advisor and each of FSIC, FSIC III, FSIC IV, CCT and CCT II, KKR Credit will become a member of the Joint Advisor, which will be jointly controlled by FS Investments or one of its affiliates and KKR Credit.

The Company’s chairman, president and chief executive officer, Michael C. Forman, will serve as the Joint Advisor’s chairman and chief executive officer and Todd C. Builione, the president of KKR Credit, will serve as the Joint Advisor’s president.

The Joint Advisor’s senior management team will have significant experience in private lending and private equity investing, and will have developed an expertise in using all levels of a firm’s capital structure to produce income-generating investments, while focusing on risk management. The team will also have extensive knowledge of the managerial, operational and regulatory requirements of publicly registered alternative asset entities, such as BDCs. The Company believes that the active and ongoing participation by FS Investments, KKR Credit and their respective affiliates in the credit markets, and the depth of experience and disciplined investment approach of the Joint Advisor’s management team, will allow the Joint Advisor to successfully execute the Company’s investment strategies.

The Joint Advisor’s investment committee will initially be comprised of Todd Builione, Sean Coleman, Brian Gerson, Michael Kelly, Daniel Pietrzak and Ryan Wilson. See “Proposal 1: Approval of InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Proposal—Management of the InvestmentCo-Advisors” in this proxy statement for additional information. The Board, including a majority of the Independent Directors, will oversee and monitor the Company’s investment performance and will review the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement as required by the 1940 Act, to determine, among other things, whether the fees payable under such agreement are reasonable in light of the services provided.

About FS Investments

FS Investments is a leading asset manager dedicated to helping individuals, financial professionals and institutions design better portfolios. The firm provides access to alternative sources of income and growth and focuses on setting the industry standards for investor education and transparency.

FS Investments is headquartered in Philadelphia with offices in Orlando, FL and Washington, D.C. The firm had more than $20 billion in assets under managementvalue” as of September 30, 2017.

22


About KKR Credit

The information set forth under2019 to the heading “About KKR Credit” in “Proposal 1: Approvalpro forma assets as of InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Proposal” is incorporated herein by reference.

ManagementSeptember 30, 2019 and (iv) interest expense on incremental pro forma leverage of 5.10%, which was the Joint Advisor

The management ofpro forma weighted average interest rate on the Company’s investment portfolio will be the responsibilityindebtedness as of the Joint Advisor’s investment committee which will be comprised of three appointees of FS Investments or one of its affiliates (initially Sean Coleman, Brian Gerson and Michael Kelly) and three appointees of KKR Credit (initially Todd Builione, Daniel Pietrzak and Ryan Wilson). A team of dedicated investment professionals consisting of personnel from FS Investments and KKR Credit will provide services to the CompanySeptember 30, 2019. See “Impact on behalf of the Joint Advisor. The investment committee will be responsible for establishing and monitoring the Company’s investment program, developing the portfolio, setting the risk parameters for the Company and approving all Company investments. In all matters in which a vote of the investment committee is required, the unanimous vote of all members of the investment committee present at a meeting where a quorum is present (which requires the presence of one designee of FS Investments or one of its affiliates and one designee of KKR Credit) is required to authorize or approve such matters.

In performing its duties under the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement, the Joint Advisor will provide the Company with services to facilitate the conduct of its business, including but not limited to: (a) sourcing, structuring, underwriting, performing diligence, executing and monitoring investments; (b) researching, selecting, trading and underwriting new investment opportunities; (c) investor account management; (d) legal, compliance, finance, accounting, operations and human resources services; and (e) risk management functions. KKR Credit and FS Investments or one of its affiliates will be collectively responsible for providing appropriate assets, resources, time and personnel to allow the Joint Advisor to provide to the Company the services required under the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement. KKR Credit and FS Investments or one of its affiliates will coordinate their activities during the period in which the Joint Advisory Agreement would be in effect to avoid duplication of efforts and ensure a balanced and effective allocation of responsibilities and net fee revenue earnedadvisory fees paid by the Joint Advisor and efficiency in the provision of the required services to the Company thereunder.Company” below.

FS Investments or one of its affiliates, subject to the reasonable consent of KKR Credit and appointment by the board of the Joint Advisor, will designate the Joint Advisor’s chairman and chief executive officer and chief compliance officer. KKR Credit, subject to the reasonable consent of FS Investments or one of its affiliates and appointment by the board of the Joint Advisor, will designate the Joint Advisor’s president and chief credit officer.

The biographical information set forth under the heading “Management of the InvestmentCo-Advisors” in “Proposal 1: Approval of InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Proposal” is incorporated herein by reference.

Terms of the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement

The terms of the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement are substantially similar to those of the Current Investment Advisory Agreement, except for, among other things, the fees payable thereunder, the name of the investment adviser and the date of effectiveness. The description of the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement that follows is a summary only and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the copy of the form of the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement included in Exhibit C hereto.

Duties.Subject to the overall supervision of the Board, the Joint Advisor will oversee the Company’sday-to-day operations and provide the Company with investment advisory services. Under the terms of the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement, the Joint Advisor will:

(i)determine the composition and allocation of the Company’s investment portfolio, the nature and timing of any changes therein and the manner of implementing such changes;

23


(ii)identify, evaluate and negotiate the structure of the investments made by the Company;

 

39


(6)(iii)execute, monitor and service the Company’s investments;

(iv)place orders with respect to, and arrange for, any investment by the Company;

(v)determine the securities and other assets that the Company shall purchase, retain, or sell;

(vi)perform due diligence on prospective portfolio companies; and

(vii)provide the Company with such other investment advisory, research and related services as the Company may, from time to time, reasonably request or require for the investment of its funds.

The duties to be provided under the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement are substantially the same as those under the Current Investment Advisory Agreement.

Fees and Expenses.The Company will pay the Joint Advisor a fee for its services under the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement consistingAs of two components—an annual base management fee based on the average weekly value ofSeptember 30, 2019, the Company’s gross assets and an incentive fee based on the Company’s performance. The cost of both the base management fee payable to the Joint Advisor and any incentive fees it earns will ultimately be borne by the Company’s stockholders.

The base management fee will be calculated at an annualpro forma indebtedness bore a weighted average interest rate of 1.5% of the average weekly value of the Company’s gross assets. The base management fee will be payable quarterly in arrears and will be calculated based on the average weekly value of the Company’s gross assets during the most recently completed calendar quarter. The base management fee may or may not be taken in whole or in part at the discretion of the Joint Advisor. All or any part of the base management fee not taken as to any quarter will be deferred without interest and may be taken in such other quarter as the Joint Advisor shall determine. The base management fee for any partial month or quarter will be appropriately prorated. The other terms of the base management fee are the same as those under the Current Investment Advisory Agreement.

The incentive fee will consist of two parts. The first part of the incentive fee, which is referred to as the subordinated incentive fee on income, will be calculated and payable quarterly in arrears, will equal 20.0% of the Company’s“pre-incentive fee net investment income” for the immediately preceding quarter and will be subject to a hurdle rate, expressed as a rate of return on adjusted capital, equal to 1.75% per quarter, or an annualized hurdle rate of 7.0%5.10%. For purposes of the subordinated incentive fee on income, “adjusted capital” means cumulative gross proceeds generated from sales“200% asset coverage” column, the table above assumes total pro forma debt outstanding of the Shares (including proceeds from the Company’s distribution reinvestment plan) reduced for amounts paid for Share repurchases pursuant to the Company’s Share repurchase program. As a result, the Joint Advisor will not earn this incentive fee for any quarter until the Company’spre-incentive fee net investment income for such quarter exceeds the hurdle rate of 1.75%. Once the Company’spre-incentive fee net investment income in any quarter exceeds the hurdle rate, the Joint Advisor will be entitled to a“catch-up” fee equal to the$5.1 billion (the maximum amount of the Company’spre-incentive fee net investment income in excess of the hurdle rate, until the Company’spre-incentive fee net investment income for such quarter equals 2.1875%, or 8.75% annually, of adjusted capital. This“catch-up” feature will allow the Joint Advisor to recoup the fees foregone as a result of the existence of the hurdle rate. Thereafter, the Joint Advisor willborrowings that could be entitled to receive 20.0% of the Company’spre-incentive fee net investment income.

The second part of the incentive fee, which is referred to as the incentive fee on capital gains, will be determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement). This fee will equal 20.0% of the Company’s “incentive fee capital gains” (i.e., the Company’s realized capital gains on a cumulative basis from inception, calculated as of the end of the applicable period, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis), less the aggregate amount of any previously paid incentive fees on capital gains under the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement. The Company will accrue for the incentive fee on capital gains, which, if

24


earned, will be paid annually. The Company will accrue the incentive fee on capital gains based on net realized and unrealized gains; however, under the terms of the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement, the fee payable to the Joint Advisor will be based on realized gains and no such fee will be payable with respect to unrealized gains unless and until such gains are actually realized. The other terms of the incentive fee are the same as those under the Current Investment Advisory Agreement.

All personnel of the Joint Advisor, when and to the extent engaged in providing services under the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement, and the compensation and routine overhead expenses of such personnel allocable to such services, shall be provided and paid for by the Joint Advisor or its affiliates and not by the Company. The treatment of expenses is the same under the Current Investment Advisory Agreement.

Term. The Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement will remain in effect initially for two years, and thereafter will continue automatically for successive annual periods, provided that such continuance is specifically approved at least annually by (i) the vote of the Board, or by the vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Company and (ii) the vote of a majority of the Independent Directors in accordance with the requirements of the 1940 Act. The Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement may be terminated at any time, without the payment of any penalty, upon 60 days’ written notice (a) by the Company to the Joint Advisor, (i) upon the vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Company (within the meaning of Section 2(a)(42) of the 1940 Act), or (ii) by the vote of the Independent Directors, or (b) by the Joint Advisor to the Company. The Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement will automatically terminate in the event of its “assignment” (as such term is defined for purposes of Section 15(a)(4) of the 1940 Act).

Indemnification.The Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement provides that the Joint Advisor and anysub-adviser (and their officers, managers, partners, members (and their members, including the owners of their members), agents, employees, controlling persons (as defined in the 1940 Act) and any other person or entity affiliated with, or acting on behalf of, the Joint Advisor or any suchsub-adviser) (collectively, the “Joint Advisor Indemnified Parties”), will not be liable to the Company for any action taken or omitted to be taken by any such Joint Advisor Indemnified Party in connection with the performance of any of its duties or obligations under the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement or otherwise as an investment adviser of the Company (except to the extent specified in Section 36(b) of the 1940 Act concerning loss resulting from a breach of fiduciary duty (as the same is finally determined by judicial proceedings) with respect to the receipt of compensation for services), and the Company will indemnify, defend and protect the Joint Advisor Indemnified Parties (each of whom shall be deemed a third party beneficiary thereof) and hold them harmless from and against all Losses incurred by the Joint Advisor Indemnified Parties in or by reason of any pending, threatened or completed action, suit, investigation or other proceeding (including an action or suit by or in the right of the Company or its security holders) arising out of or otherwise based upon the performance of any of the Joint Advisor’s duties or obligations under the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement or otherwise as an investment adviser of the Company, to the extent such Losses are not fully reimbursed by insurance, and to the extent that such indemnification would not be inconsistent with the laws of the State of Maryland or other applicable law, the Company’s Articles of Amendment and Restatement or, for only as long as the Shares are not listed on a national securities exchange, the provisions of Section II.G of the Omnibus Guidelines published by the North American Securities Administrators Association on March 29, 1992, as it may be amended from time to time. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, nothing contained in the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement will protect or be deemed to protect the Joint Advisor Indemnified Parties against or entitle or be deemed to entitle the Joint Advisor Indemnified Parties to indemnification in respect of any Losses to the Company or its stockholders to which the Joint Advisor Indemnified Parties would otherwise be subject by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of the Joint Advisor’s duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of the Joint Advisor’s duties and obligations under the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement.

Brand Usage. The Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement provides, subject to certain limitations, that the Joint Advisor grants anon-exclusive,non-transferrable,non-sublicensable and royalty-free license to the

25


Company for use of the trademark “FS/KKR Advisor” in connection with the Company’s public filings, requests for information from state and federal regulators, offering materials and advertising materials and investor communications.

Third Party Beneficiaries.The Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement provides that except for any Joint Advisor Indemnified Party, the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement is for the sole benefit of the parties thereto and their permitted assigns.

Insurance. The Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement provides that, subject to the requirements of Rule17d-1(d)(7) under the 1940 Act, the Company shall acquire and maintain a directors and officers liability insurance policy or similar policy with reasonable coverage from a reputable insurer.

Board Consideration

At a meeting of the Board held on November 28, 2017, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Directors, approved the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement as being in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. The Board then directed that the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement be submitted to the Company’s stockholders for approval with the Board’s recommendation that the stockholders of the Company vote to approve the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement.

The InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Proposal and the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal are not contingent on one another. However, if the stockholders of the Company do not approve both the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreements Proposal and the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal, then the Board will consider and evaluate its options to determine what alternatives are in the Company’s best interests and that of the Company’s stockholders.

Factors Considered by the Board

The Board, in approving and recommending stockholder approval of the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement, considered information furnished and discussed at Board meetings and executive sessions with management and counsel and provided specifically in relation to the consideration of the approval of the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement in response to requests of the Independent Directors and their independent legal counsel.

In its deliberations, the Board considered (i) a range of materials and information regarding the nature and quality of services to be provided by the Joint Advisor, (ii) the performance of the Company compared to relevant indices and peer funds, (iii) the performance of funds advised by KKR Credit that are comparable in strategy to the Company, (iv) the proposed fees and expenses of the Company under the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement compared to thosecurrent 200% asset coverage requirement as of peer funds with investment objectives and strategies similar to the Company, and (v) the estimated profitability of the Joint Advisor under the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement. The Board also considered information related to potential “fall out” or ancillary benefits that may be enjoyed by the Joint Advisor (and its affiliates) as a result of its relationship with the Company. In addition, the Board explored alternative options, including other investment advisory arrangements. In addition to evaluating, among other things, the written information provided by FSIC II Advisor and KKR Credit regarding the Joint Advisor, the Board considered the answers to questions posed by the Board to representatives of FSIC II Advisor and KKR Credit at various meetings. The Independent Directors met separately in executive sessions with their independent legal counsel to review and consider the information provided regarding the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement.

Based on their review, the Independent Directors and the full Board concluded that it was in the best interests of the Company to approve the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement. In its deliberations, the Board did not identify any single factor or group of factors asall-important or controlling, but considered all factors together. The material factors and conclusions that formed the basis for the Board’s determinations are discussed below.

26


Nature, Extent and Quality of ServicesSeptember 30, 2019). In evaluating the nature, extent and quality of the services to be provided by the Joint Advisor, the Board reviewed information describing the projected financial strength of the Joint Advisor and the financial strength of its future owners and the experience, resources, proposed compliance programs, and key personnel of the Joint Advisor, including the personnel who will provide investment management services to the Company. The Board considered the roles and responsibilities of the Joint Advisor including, among other things, (i) setting investment guidelines for the Company’s portfolio, (ii) determining the composition and allocation of the Company’s portfolio, (iii) identifying and conducting due diligence on prospective investment opportunities for the Company, (iv) evaluating, negotiating and implementing the structure of the Company’s investments, (v) providing ongoing monitoring of the Company’s investments, and (vi) providing administrative services, including general ledger accounting, fund accounting, legal services, investor relations and other administrative services to the Company.

The Board and the Independent Directors determined that they were satisfied with the nature, quality and extent of the services to be provided by the Joint Advisor to the Company, the expertise and capabilities of the Joint Advisor’s future personnel and FSIC II Advisor’s and KKR Credit’s financial strength.

Review of Performance. With respect to the Company’s investment performance, the Board and the Independent Directors noted that the Joint Advisor does not have performance history. The Board noted, however, that the Company’s performance was reasonable as compared to the performance of funds that FSIC II Advisor believed to be relatively comparable to the Company in terms of structure, investment objectives, assets under management, portfolio mix and/or similar criteria. In addition, the Independent Directors considered the Company’s performance compared to certain indices spanning the spectrum of primary asset classes in which the Company invests. The Independent Directors noted FSIC II Advisor’s explanation of the relevance of each comparable index. The Board then considered the performance of funds managed by KKR Credit that are comparable to the Company.

The Board determined that it was generally satisfied with the Company’s and KKR Credit’s performance and would monitor the Company’s performance results under the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement.

Costs of Services Provided and Profits Realized. The Board then considered the Advisory Fees and the Company’s expense ratios as compared to a group of investment companies that FSIC II Advisor believed to be relatively comparable to the Company in terms of structure, investment objectives, assets under management, portfolio mix and/or similar criteria. The Independent Directors considered that the base management fee portion of the Advisory Fees would be reduced under the proposed arrangements, which would cause stockholders to pay a decreased Advisory Fee, but that the income incentive fee hurdle would be lowered (as described above), potentially causing the Company to reach the hurdle at a lower performance rate (and consequently, stockholders would pay the income incentive fee at a lower performance rate) than it would have under the current fee structure. The Independent Directors considered the reasons for the changes in Advisory Fees provided by FSIC II Advisor and the comparison of the Company’s proposed Advisory Fees to its peers, including that the reduced hurdle rate would substantially align with the hurdle rates of the Company’s peers.

With respect to the Company’s expense ratios, the Board considered the expense ratios compared to a group of investment companies that FSIC II Advisor believed to be relatively comparable to the Company in terms of structure, investment objectives, assets under management, portfolio mix and/or similar criteria. The Board considered FSIC II Advisor’s explanations as to the comparability of the expenses.

The Board then reviewed the estimated profitability information provided by FSIC II Advisor for the Joint Advisor and the methodology for determining profitability.

The Board determined that the Advisory Fees, proposed expense ratio and profitability are reasonable in relation to the services to be rendered to the Company by the Joint Advisor.

27


Economies of Scale. The Board considered the extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Company grows and whether the Company’s fee levels reflect these economies of scale for the benefit of Company stockholders. The Board considered the fact that such economies are less likely to be significant given the Company’s structure and focus on loans to private middle-market U.S. companies which generally require negotiation of the terms of the loans.

Other Benefits. The Board considered other benefits that may accrue to the Joint Advisor and its affiliates from its relationships with the Company, including that the Joint Advisor may potentially benefit from the success of the Company, which could attract other business to the Joint Advisor.

Overall Conclusions. Based on all of the information considered and the conclusions reached, the Board determined that the terms of the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement are fair and reasonable and that the approval of the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement is in the best interests of the Company. The Board, including a majority of the Independent Directors, unanimously approved the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement and determined to submit the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement to stockholders for approval.

Vote Required

The affirmative vote by stockholders of the Company holding a majority of the outstanding voting securities is necessary for approval of the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement. For purposes of the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal,“150% asset coverage” column, the 1940 Act defines “a majoritytable above assumes total pro forma debt outstanding of outstanding voting securities”$10.2 billion (the maximum amount of the Company as the lesser of: (1) 67% or more of the voting securities present at the Special Meeting if the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of the Company are present or represented by proxy; or (2) more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of the Company. You may vote for or against or abstain on the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will have the same effect as votes “AGAINST” the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal. Proxies received willborrowings that could be voted “FOR” the Joint Advisor Investment Advisory Agreement Proposal unless stockholders designate otherwise.

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE JOINT ADVISOR INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT PROPOSAL.

28


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

The following table sets forth, as of the Record Date, the beneficial ownership of the Company’s current directors, executive officers, each person known to the Company to beneficially own 5% or more of the outstanding Shares, and all of the Company’s executive officers and directors as a group.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with Rule13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act and includes voting or investment power with respect to the Shares. There are no Shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of November 27, 2017. Ownership information for those persons who beneficially own 5% or more of the Shares is based upon information furnished by the Company’s transfer agent and other information provided by such persons, if available.

Shares Beneficially Owned as of
November 27, 2017

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1)

Number of
Shares
Percentage  (%)(2)

Interested Directors

Michael C. Forman(3)

172,024.46*

David J. Adelman(4)

123,284.40*

Michael Heller(5)

57,742.08*

Independent Directors

Barbara Adams(6)

3,151.87*

Stephen T. Burdumy

—  —  

Richard I. Goldstein

10,093.39*

Jerel A. Hopkins

—  —  

Robert E. Keith, Jr.

23,332.62*

Paul Mendelson

15,482.21*

John E. Stuart

50,000.00*

Scott J. Tarte

46,446.61*

Executive Officers

Zachary Klehr

8,601.91*

William Goebel

3,440.50*

Stephen S. Sypherd

5,161.77*

James F. Volk

—  —  

All directors and executive officers as a group (15 persons)

518,761.81*

*Less than one percent.
(1)The address of each of the beneficial owners set forth above is c/o FS Investment Corporation II, 201 Rouse Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19112.
(2)Based on a total of 324,513,479.44 Shares issued and outstanding on November 27, 2017.
(3)All Shares held through The 2011 Forman Investment Trust, a trust created by Mr. Forman for the benefit of minor children.
(4)Includes 112,173.29 Shares held through Sylvia Associates, L.P., a limited partnership controlled by Mr. Adelman, and 11,111.11 Shares held in a joint account with spouse.
(5)All Shares held in a joint account with spouse.
(6)All Shares held in an Individual Retirement Account.

Dollar Range of Equity Securities Beneficially Owned by Directors

The table below shows the dollar range of equity securities of the Company and the aggregate dollar range of equity securities of the Fund Complex that were beneficially owned by each director as of the Record Date stated as one of the following dollar ranges: None;$1-$10,000;$10,001-$50,000;$50,001-$100,000; or Over

29


$100,000. For purposes of this proxy statement, the term “Fund Complex” is defined to include the Company, FS Investment Corporation, FS Investment Corporation III, FS Investment Corporation IV, FS Energy and Power Fund, FS Global Credit Opportunities Fund, FS Global Credit Opportunities Fund—A, FS Global Credit Opportunities Fund—D, FS Global Credit Opportunities Fund—ADV, FS Global Credit Opportunities Fund—T, FS Global Credit Opportunities Fund—T2, FS Energy Total Return Fund, FS Credit Real Estate Income Trust, Inc., FS Credit Income Fund and FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund.

Name of Director

Dollar Range of
Equity Securities
Beneficially
Owned
in the  Company(1)(2)
Aggregate Dollar Range
of Equity Securities
in the Fund
Complex(1)(2)

Interested Directors:

Michael C. Forman

[●][●]

David J. Adelman

[●][●]

Michael J. Heller

[●][●]

Independent Directors:

Barbara Adams

[●][●]

Stephen T. Burdumy

[●][●]

Richard I. Goldstein

[●][●]

Jerel A. Hopkins

[●][●]

Robert E. Keith, Jr.

[●][●]

Paul Mendelson

[●][●]

John E. Stuart

[●][●]

Scott J. Tarte

[●][●]

(1)Beneficial ownership determined in accordance with Rule16a-1(a)(2) promulgated under the Exchange Act.
(2)The dollar range of equity securities of FSIC beneficially owned by directors of the Company, if applicable, is calculated by multiplying the closing price of its shares as reported on the New York Stock Exchange, LLC on [●], 2018, times the number of shares beneficially owned. The dollar range of equity securities of the other funds in the Fund Complex, including the Company, is calculated in accordance with the applicable account statement rules of The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.

HOUSEHOLDING

The Company combines mailings for multiple accounts going to a single household by delivering to that address, in a single envelope, a copy of the documents (annual reports, prospectuses, proxy statements, etc.) or other communications for all accounts who have consented or are deemed to have consented to receiving such communications in such manner in accordance with the rules promulgated by the SEC. If you do not want the Company to continue consolidating your Company mailings and would prefer to receive separate mailings of Company communications, please contact the Company’s transfer agent, DST Systems, Inc. at(877) 628-8575 or by mail to FS Investment Corporation II, c/o DST Systems, Inc., 430 W. 7th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64105-1594.

INFORMATION INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Statements contained in this proxy statement, or in any document incorporated by reference into this proxy statement, regarding the contents of any contract or other document, are not necessarily complete and each such statement is qualified in its entirety by reference to that contract or other document filed as an exhibit with the SEC. The SEC allows the Company to “incorporate by reference” into this proxy statement documents the Company files with the SEC. This means that the Company can disclose important information to you by referring you to those documents. The information incorporated by reference is considered to be a part of this proxy statement, and later information that the Company files with the SEC will update and supersede that

30


information. The Company incorporates by reference the documents listed below and any documents filedincurred by the Company pursuant to Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d)under the proposed 150% asset coverage requirement as of the Exchange Act after the date of this proxy statement and before the date of the Special Meeting.

Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (filed on March 15, 2017);

Quarterly Reports on Form10-Q for the fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2017 (filed on May 12, 2017), June 30, 2017 (filed on August 11, 2017) and September 30, 2017 (filed on November 13, 2017);2019).

(7)

Current Reports on Form8-K filed with the SEC on January 3, 2017, February 22, 2017, March 1, 2017, March 15, 2017, April 3, 2017, May 8, 2017, May 12, 2017, May 16, 2017, June 1, 2017, June 13, 2017, August 3, 2017, August 11, 2017, September 1, 2017, November 3, 2017, November 13, 2017“Other Expenses” include accounting, legal and December 11, 2017;auditing fees and

Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A for the Company’s 2017 Annual Meeting (filed on April 28, 2017).

Notwithstanding the foregoing, information furnished under Item 2.02 or 7.01 of any Current Report on Form8-K, including the related exhibits, is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.

Shareholders may obtain a free copy of this proxy statement, excise and state taxes, as well as any filing incorporated by reference herein, without charge, at the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov). The Company will also furnish, without charge, a copy of this proxy statement, as well as any filing incorporated by reference herein, to any shareholder upon request. Requests should be directed to the Company at (844)358-7276 and select Option 1 or by mail to FS Investment Corporation II, 201 Rouse Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19112.

31


INVESTMENT ADVISER AND ADMINISTRATOR ANDSUB-ADMINISTRATOR

Set forth below are the names and addressesreimbursement of the Company’s investment advisercompensation of administrative personnel and administrator andsub-administrator:

INVESTMENT ADVISER

AND ADMINISTRATOR

INVESTMENTSUB-ADVISER

SUB-ADMINISTRATOR

FSIC II Advisor, LLC

201 Rouse Boulevard

Philadelphia, PA 19112

GSO / Blackstone Debt

Funds Management LLC

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154

State Street Bank and

Trust Company

One Lincoln Street, Mailstop SUM 0703

Boston, MA 02111

PLEASE VOTE PROMPTLY BY SIGNING AND DATING THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AND RETURNING IT IN THE ACCOMPANYING POSTAGE PAID RETURN ENVELOPE OR BY FOLLOWING THE INSTRUCTIONS PRINTED ON THE PROXY CARD, WHICH PROVIDES INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORIZING A PROXY BY TELEPHONE OR THROUGH THE INTERNET. NO POSTAGE IS REQUIRED IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES.

32


EXHIBIT A

INVESTMENT ADVISORY AND

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

FS INVESTMENT CORPORATION II

AND

FSIC II ADVISOR, LLC

This Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement (this “Agreement”) is made this [●] day of [●], 2018, by and between FS INVESTMENT CORPORATION II, a Maryland corporation (the “Corporation”), and FSIC II ADVISOR, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Adviser”).

WHEREAS, the Corporation is anon-diversified,closed-end management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”); and

WHEREAS, the Adviser is an investment adviser that has registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”);

WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to retain the Adviser to furnish investment advisory services to the Corporation and to provide for the administrative services necessary for the operation of the Corporation on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, and the Adviser wishes to be retained to provide such services; and

WHEREAS, the Corporation is simultaneously entering into an Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement with KKR CREDIT ADVISORS (US) LLC (the “Co-Adviser”), dated as of the date hereof (the “InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement”), pursuant to which theCo-Adviser will, as aco-adviser with the Adviser, furnish investment advisory services to the Corporation and provide for the administrative services necessary for the operation of the Corporation on the terms and conditions identical to those set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereby agree as follows:

1.Duties of the Adviser.

(a)    Retention of Adviser. The Corporation hereby appoints the Adviser to act asco-adviser to the Corporation and to manage, in coordination with theCo-Adviser, the investment and reinvestment of the assets of the Corporation, subject to the supervision of the board of directors of the Corporation (the “Board”), for the period and upon the terms herein set forth, in accordance with:

(i)    the investment objectives, policies and restrictions that are set forth in the Corporation’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), as supplemented, amended or superseded from time to time;

(ii)    all other applicable federal and state laws, rules and regulations, and the Corporation’s articles of amendment and restatement (as may be amended from time to time, the “Articles”) and bylaws (as may be amended from time to time, the “Bylaws”); and

(iii)    such investment policies, directives and regulatory restrictions as the Corporation may from time to time establish or issue and communicate to the Adviser in writing.

(b)    Responsibilities of Adviser. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Adviser shall, in coordination with theCo-Adviser, during the term and subject to the provisions of this Agreement:

(i)    determine the composition and allocation of the Corporation’s investment portfolio, the nature and timing of any changes therein and the manner of implementing such changes;


(ii)    identify, evaluate and negotiate the structure of the investments made by the Corporation;

(iii)    execute, monitor and service the Corporation’s investments;

(iv)    place orders with respect to, and arrange for, any investment by the Corporation;

(v)    determine the securities and other assets that the Corporation shall purchase, retain, or sell;

(vi)    perform due diligence on prospective portfolio companies; and

(vii)    provide the Corporation with such other investment advisory, research and related services as the Corporation may, from time to time, reasonably request or require for the investment of its funds.

The Corporation acknowledges that the Adviser andCo-Adviser, may from time to time, designate one or the other as being primarily responsible for certain investments. The Adviser shall have no obligation hereunder to supervise theCo-Adviser’s provision of services under the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement.

(c)    Power and Authority. To facilitate the Adviser’s performance of these undertakings, but subject to the restrictions contained herein, the Corporation hereby delegates to the Adviser (which power and authority may be delegated by the Adviser to one or more Sub-Advisers (as defined below)), and the Adviser hereby accepts, the power and authority to act on behalf of the Corporation, in coordination with theCo-Adviser, to effectuate investment decisions for the Corporation, including the negotiation, execution and delivery of all documents relating to the Corporation’s investments and the placing of orders for other purchase or sale transactions on behalf of the Corporation. In the event that the Corporation determines to acquire debt financing (or to refinance existing debt financing), the Adviser, in coordination with theCo-Adviser, shall seek to arrange for such financing on the Corporation’s behalf, subject to the oversight and approval of the Board. The Corporation also grants to the Adviser, in coordination with theCo-Adviser, power and authority to engage in all activities and transactions (and anything incidental thereto) that the Adviser, in coordination with theCo-Adviser, deems appropriate, necessary or advisable to carry out its duties pursuant to this Agreement, including the authority to provide, on behalf of the Corporation, significant managerial assistance to the Corporation’s portfolio companies to the extent required by the Investment Company Act or otherwise deemed appropriate by the Adviser, in coordination with theCo-Adviser.

(d)    Administrative Services. Subject to the supervision, direction and control of the Board, the provisions of the Articles and Bylaws and applicable federal and state law, the Adviser, in coordination with theCo-Adviser, shall perform, or cause to be performed by other persons, all administrative services in connection with the operation of the Corporation.

(e)    Acceptance of Appointment. The Adviser hereby accepts such appointment and agrees during the term hereof to render the services described herein for the compensation provided herein, subject to the limitations contained herein.

(f)    Sub-Advisers. The Adviser, subject to the prior written consent of theCo-Adviser, is hereby authorized to enter into one or moresub-advisory agreements (each, a “Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with other investment advisers or other service providers (each, a “Sub-Adviser”) pursuant to which the Adviser may obtain the services of theSub-Adviser(s) to assist the Adviser in fulfilling its responsibilities hereunder, subject to the oversight of the Adviser and the Corporation. Specifically, the Adviser may retain aSub-Adviser to recommend specific securities or other investments based upon the Corporation’s investment objectives, policies and restrictions, and work, along with the Adviser, in sourcing, structuring, negotiating, arranging or effecting the acquisition or disposition of such investments and monitoring investments on behalf of the Corporation, subject to the oversight of the Adviser and the Corporation, with the scope of such services and oversight to be set forth in eachSub-Advisory Agreement.

(i)    The Adviser and/orCo-Adviser, and not the Corporation, shall be responsible for any compensation payable to anySub-Adviser; provided, however, that the Adviser shall have the right to direct

2


the Corporation to pay directly anySub-Adviser the amounts due and payable to suchSub-Adviser from the fees and expenses otherwise payable to the Adviser under this Agreement.

(ii)    AnySub-Advisory Agreement entered into by the Adviser shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Investment Company Act, including without limitation the requirements relating to the Board and the Corporation’s stockholder approval thereunder, and other applicable federal and state law.

(iii)    AnySub-Adviser shall be subject to the same fiduciary duties imposed on the Adviser pursuant to this Agreement, the Investment Company Act and the Advisers Act, as well as other applicable federal and state law.

(g)    Independent Contractor Status. The Adviser shall, for all purposes herein provided, be deemed to be an independent contractor and, except as expressly provided or authorized herein, shall have no authority to act for or represent the Corporation in any way or otherwise be deemed an agent of the Corporation.

(h)    Record Retention. Subject to review by, and the overall control of, the Board, the Adviser shall keep and preserve for the period required by the Investment Company Act or the Advisers Act, as applicable, any books and records relevant to the provision of its investment advisory services to the Corporation and shall specifically maintain all books and records with respect to the Corporation’s portfolio transactions and shall render to the Board such periodic and special reports as the Board may reasonably request or as may be required under applicable federal and state law, and shall make such records available for inspection by the Board and its authorized agents, at any time and from time to time during normal business hours. The Adviser agrees that all records that it maintains for the Corporation are the property of the Corporation and shall surrender promptly to the Corporation any such records upon the Corporation’s request and upon termination of this Agreement pursuant toSection 9, provided that the Adviser may retain a copy of such records. The Adviser shall have the right to retain copies, or originals where required by Rule204-2 promulgated under the Advisers Act, of such records to the extent required by applicable law.

The following provisions in thisSection 1 shall apply for only so long as the shares of common stock of the Corporation (“Common Stock”) are not listed on a national securities exchange.

(i)    Administrator. The Adviser shall, upon request by an official or agency administering the securities laws of a state, province or commonwealth (an “Administrator”), submit to such Administrator the reports and statements required to be distributed to the Corporation’s stockholders pursuant to this Agreement, the Corporation’s then effective Registration Statement on FormN-2 (as amended from time to time, the “Registration Statement”) and applicable federal and state law.

(j)    Fiduciary Duty. It is acknowledged that the Adviser shall have a fiduciary responsibility for the safekeeping and use of all funds and assets of the Corporation, whether or not in the Adviser’s immediate possession or control. The Adviser shall not employ, or permit another to employ, such funds or assets in any manner except for the exclusive benefit of the Corporation. The Adviser shall not, by entry into an agreement with any stockholder of the Corporation or otherwise, contract away the fiduciary obligation owed to the Corporation and the Corporation’s stockholders under common law.

2.The Corporations Responsibilities and Expenses Payable by the Corporation and the Adviser.

(a)    Adviser Personnel. All personnel of the Adviser, when and to the extent engaged in providing investment advisory services herein, and the compensation and routine overhead expenses of such personnel allocable to such services, shall be provided and paid for by the Adviser or its affiliates and not by the Corporation.

(b)    Costs. Subject to the limitations on reimbursement of the Adviser as set forth inSection 2(c) below, the Corporation, either directly or through reimbursement to the Adviser, shall bear all other costs and expenses

3


of its operations and transactions, including (without limitation): expenses deemed to be “organization and offering expenses” of the Corporation for purposes of Conduct Rule 2310(a)(12) of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (for purposes of this Agreement, such expenses, exclusive of commissions, the dealer manager fee, any discounts and other similar expenses paid by investors at the time of sale of the stock of the Corporation, are hereinafter referred to as “Organization and Offering Costs”); corporate and organizational expenses relating to offerings of shares of Common Stock, subject to limitations included in this Agreement; the cost of calculating the Corporation’s net asset value for each share class, as applicable, including the cost of any third-party pricing or valuation services; the cost of effecting sales and repurchases of shares of Common Stock and other securities; investment advisory fees; fees payable to third parties including, without limitation, agents, consultants or other advisors, relating to, or associated with, making investments, monitoring investments and valuing investments, including fees and expenses associated with performing due diligence reviews of prospective investments; interest payments on the Corporation’s debt or related obligations; transfer agent and custodial fees; research and market data (including news and quotation equipment and services, and any computer hardware and connectivity hardware (e.g., telephone and fiber optic lines) incorporated into the cost of obtaining such research and market data); fees and expenses associated with marketing efforts; federal and state registration or notification fees; federal, state and local taxes; fees and expenses ofCompany’s directors who do not also servingserve in an executive officer capacity for the CorporationCompany or the Adviser; costs of proxy statements, stockholders’ reports, notices and other filings; fidelity bond, directors and officers errors and omissions liability insurance and other insurance premiums; direct costs such as printing, mailing, long distance telephone and staff costs; fees and expenses associated with accounting, corporate governance, independent audits and outside legal costs; costs associated withAdvisor. The amount presented in the Corporation’s reporting and compliance obligations under the Investment Company Act and applicable federal and state securities laws, including compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended; all costs of registration and listing the Corporation’s Common Stock or other securities on any securities exchange; brokerage commissionstable reflects pro forma amounts incurred for the Corporation’s investments; all other expenses incurred by the Adviser,nine months ended September 30, 2019, on an annualized basis.

Examples. The following examples demonstrate the projected dollar amount of total cumulative expenses that would be incurred over various periods with respect to a hypothetical investment in (i) the Company’s common stock and (ii) on a pro forma basis, the combined company’s common stock, respectively, assuming (1) actual asset coverage of (a) 237% for the Company and (b) 250% on a pro forma basis for the combined company, each as of September 30, 2019, (2) a hypothetical asset coverage ratio of 200% and (3) a hypothetical asset coverage ratio of 150%, assuming that the Company’s and combined company’s, as applicable, annual operating expenses remain at the levels set forth in the table above for the respective asset coverage ratio, except for the incentive fee based on income. Transaction expenses are not included in the following example.

An investor would pay the following expenses on a $1,000 investment in the Company’s common stock:

   1 year   3 years   5 years   10 years 

Based on the Actual Asset Coverage (237%) as of September  30, 2019

        

Assuming a 5% annual return (none of which is subject to the incentive fee based on capital gains)

  $72   $210   $343   $648 

Assuming a 5% annual return resulting entirely from net realized capital gains (all of which is subject to the incentive fee based on capital gains)

  $81   $236   $380   $703 

Based on 200% Asset Coverage

        

Assuming a 5% annual return (none of which is subject to the incentive fee based on capital gains)

  $88   $254   $407   $739 

Assuming a 5% annual return resulting entirely from net realized capital gains (all of which is subject to the incentive fee based on capital gains)

  $97   $278   $441   $782 

Based on 150% Asset Coverage

        

Assuming a 5% annual return (none of which is subject to the incentive fee based on capital gains)

  $143   $386   $584   $928 

Assuming a 5% annual return resulting entirely from net realized capital gains (all of which is subject to the incentive fee based on capital gains)

  $151   $406   $607   $946 

40


An investor would pay the following expenses on a $1,000 investment in the combined company’s common stock:

   1 year   3 years   5 years   10 years 

Based on Pro Forma Asset Coverage (250%) as of September  30, 2019

        

Assuming a 5% annual return (none of which is subject to the incentive fee based on capital gains)

  $69   $204   $333   $633 

Assuming a 5% annual return resulting entirely from net realized capital gains (all of which is subject to the incentive fee based on capital gains)

  $79   $229   $371   $689 

Based on Pro Forma 200% Asset Coverage

        

Assuming a 5% annual return (none of which is subject to the incentive fee based on capital gains)

  $90   $259   $413   $747 

Assuming a 5% annual return resulting entirely from net realized capital gains (all of which is subject to the incentive fee based on capital gains)

  $99   $282   $447   $790 

Based on Pro Forma 150% Asset Coverage

        

Assuming a 5% annual return (none of which is subject to the incentive fee based on capital gains)

  $145   $392   $590   $933 

Assuming a 5% annual return resulting entirely from net realized capital gains (all of which is subject to the incentive fee based on capital gains)

  $154   $411   $613   $950 

The above tables are to assist you in understanding the various costs and expenses that an investor in the Company’s common stock and, on a pro forma basis, the combined company’s common stock, respectively, will bear directly or indirectly. The examples assume, as required by the SEC, that no subordinated incentive fee on income would be accrued and payable in any of the indicated time periods. Performance will vary and may result in a return greater or less than 5%. If the Company were to achieve sufficient returns on its investments, including through the realization of capital gains, to trigger an incentive fee of a material amount, its expenses, and returns to its investors, would be higher. In addition, while the example assumes reinvestment of all distributions at net asset value, reinvestment of distributions under the distribution reinvestment plans may occur at a price per share that differs from the then-current net asset value per share of common stock of the respective company.

While the above tables assume as indicated an asset coverage ratio of 150%, the Advisor, in consultation with the Board, will determine the appropriate level of leverage for the Company based on a variety of factors. As such, even if the Leverage Proposal is approved, the Company may continue to operate with lower levels of leverage (i.e., higher asset coverage ratios).

Risks Relative to the Benefits Associated With the Use of Increased Leverage

The Board considered how increased leverage could increase the risks associated with investing in the Company’s common stock. For example, if the value of the Company’s assets decreases, leverage will cause the Company’s net asset value to decline more rapidly and to a greater extent than it otherwise would have without leverage or with lower leverage, increasing the risk of investing in the Company’s common stock. Similarly, any decrease in the Company’s revenue would cause its net income to decline more rapidly and to a greater extent than it would have if the Company had not borrowed or had borrowed less. In addition, the Company would have to service any additional debt that it incurs, including interest expense on debt and dividends on preferred stock that the Company may issue, as well as the fees and costs related to the entry into or amendments to debt facilities. These expenses (which would be higher than the expenses on the Company’s current borrowings due to the rising interest rate environment) would decrease net investment income, and the Company’s ability to pay such expenses will depend largely on the Company’s financial performance and will be subject to prevailing

41


economic conditions and competitive pressures. For additional information regarding risks relating to the Company’s use of leverage, see “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Debt Financing” in the Company’s annual report onForm 10-K, filed on March 19, 2019.

Since the Company already uses leverage in optimizing its investment portfolio, there are no material new types of risk associated with the ability to increase leverage, although risks to which the Company is already subject due to its use of leverage would be increased. The Board concluded that the potential benefits of increased leverage outweigh these risks. Management also discussed with the Board its plan to continue the Company’s current investment strategy and framework and ensure that the Company maintains sound risk management processes to navigate the risks associated with expanded leverage.

Impact on advisory fees paid by the Company

The base management fee payable to the Advisor pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement is calculated at an annual rate of 1.50% of the average weekly value of the Company’s gross assets excluding cash and cash equivalents, which base management fee is reduced from 1.5% to 1.0% on all assets financed using leverage over 1.0xdebt-to-equity. As such, incurring additional leverage would increase the management fee payable to the Advisor. On an actual basis without giving effect to the Mergers, (i) if the Company doubled the amount of its borrowings as of September 30, 2019, the base management fee would increase by 32.0% and (ii) if the Company incurred the maximum amount of borrowings that could be incurred by the Company under the 150% minimum asset coverage ratio as of September 30, 2019, the base management fee would increase by 52.0%, in each case because the base management fee is based on gross assets. On a pro forma basis giving effect to the Mergers, (i) if the combined company doubled the amount of its borrowings as of September 30, 2019, the base management fee would increase by 31.8% and (ii) if the combined company incurred the maximum amount of borrowings that could be incurred by the Company under the 150% minimum asset coverage ratio as of September 30, 2019, the base management fee would increase by 57.0%, in each case because the base management fee is based on gross assets. In addition, as additional leverage would magnify positive returns, if any, on the Company’s portfolio, the Company’s net investment income may exceed the quarterly hurdle rate for the subordinated incentive fee on income payable to the Advisor pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement at a lower average return on the Company’s portfolio. Thus, the Board considered that, if the Company incurs additional leverage, the Advisor may receive additional incentive fees without any corresponding increase (and potentially with a decrease) in the Company’s performance. As a result, in the event that the Leverage Proposal is approved by the stockholders, aggregate fees payable to the Advisor under the Investment Advisory Agreement may increase depending on the amount of additional leverage incurred, irrespective of the return on the incremental assets. The Board also noted that sourcing additional investment opportunities to deploy any additional capital will require additional time and effort on the part of the Advisor and its investment personnel.

Additional Disclosure Obligations

The Board also noted that the Company must comply with the following additional disclosure requirements upon approval of the application of the 150% minimum asset coverage ratio to the Company by the stockholders as set forth herein:

not later than five (5) business days after the date on which the 150% minimum asset coverage ratio is approved, the Company is required to disclose such approval, and the effective date of such approval, in (1) a filing submitted to the SEC under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (2) a notice on the Company’s website;

the Company is required to disclose, in each periodic filing required under Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act: (1) the aggregate principal amount or liquidation preference, as applicable, of the senior securities issued by the Company and the asset coverage ratio as of the date of the Company’s most recent financial statements included in that filing; (2) that the 150% minimum asset coverage ratio was approved; and (3) the effective date of such approval; and

42


as an issuer of common stock, the Company is also required to include in each periodic filing required under Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act disclosures that are reasonably designed to ensure that the Company’s stockholders are informed of: (1) the amount of senior securities (and the associated asset coverage ratios) of the Company, determined as of the date of the most recent financial statements of the Company included in the filing; and (2) the principal risk factors associated with the senior securities described in the preceding clause, to the extent that risk is incurred by the Company.

Other Considerations

In addition, the Board considered that holders of any senior securities, including any additional senior securities that the Company may be able to issue as a result of the reduced asset coverage requirements, will have fixed-dollar claims on the Company’s assets that are superior to the claims of the stockholders. In the case of a liquidation event, holders of these senior securities would receive proceeds to the extent of their fixed claims before any distributions are made to the stockholders, and the issuance of additional senior securities may result in fewer proceeds remaining for distribution to the stockholders if the assets purchased with the capital raise from such issuances decline in value.

Conclusion

Based on its consideration of each of the above factors and such other information as the Board deemed relevant, the Board concluded that the Leverage Proposal is in the best interests of the Company and the stockholders and recommended that the stockholders approve the Leverage Proposal.

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF

THE APPLICATION OF THE REDUCED ASSET COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS IN

SECTION 61(A)(2) OF THE 1940 ACT TO THE COMPANY.

43


PROPOSAL 3: AUTHORIZATION TO OFFER AND SELL SHARES OF COMMON STOCK BELOW NET ASSET VALUE FOLLOWING THE LISTING OF THE COMPANY’S COMMON STOCK ON A NATIONAL SECURITIES EXCHANGE

Background

The 1940 Act generally prohibits the Company, as a BDC, from offering and selling shares at a price per share, after deducting underwriting commissions and discounts, below the then-current net asset value (“NAV”) per share unless the policy and practice of doing so is approved by the Company’s stockholders within one year immediately prior to any such sales.

The Company is seeking stockholder approval of the Share Issuance Proposal, which, if approved, would allow the Company to sell its Shares below NAV per Share in order to provide flexibility for future sales, which typically are undertaken quickly in response to market conditions, following the listing of the Company’s common stock on a national securities exchange. The Company believes that it is important to maintain consistent access to capital through the public and private equity markets to enable the Company to raise capital for the Company’s operations, including to repay outstanding indebtedness of the Company, to continue to build the Company’s investment portfolio or for other general corporate purposes, as and when the Board believes it is in the Company’s best interests and that of stockholders. The final terms of any such sales will be determined by the Board at the time of sale. Also, because the Company does not have any immediate plans to sell any Shares at a price below NAV per Share, it is impracticable to describe the transaction or transactions in which such Shares would be sold. Instead, any transaction where the Company would sell Shares, including the nature and amount of consideration that would be received by the Company at the time of sale and the use of any such consideration, will be reviewed and approved by the Board at the time of sale. If the Share Issuance Proposal is approved, the Company will not solicit further authorization from its stockholders prior to any such sale, and the authorization would be effective for Shares sold during the next 12 months following stockholder approval. This proxy statement is not an offer to sell securities of the Company. Securities may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration with the SEC or an applicable exemption from SEC registration requirements.

The Share Issuance Proposal limits the maximum number of Shares salable at a price below NAV per Share, on an aggregate basis, including any prior offerings made pursuant to this authority, to 25% of the Company’s then outstanding Shares immediately prior to each such sale. Furthermore, pursuant to this authority, there would be no limit on the discount to NAV per Share at which Shares could be sold. See below for a discussion and an example of the dilutive effect of the sale of Shares at a price below NAV per Share.

The Board, including a majority of the independent directors and a majority of directors who have no financial interest in the Share Issuance Proposal, has approved the Share Issuance Proposal as in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders and recommends it to the stockholders for their approval.

1940 Act Conditions for Sales at a Price below NAV per Share

The Company’s ability to issue Shares at a price below NAV per Share is governed by the 1940 Act. Specifically, Section 63(2) of the 1940 Act provides that the Company may offer and sell shares at prices below the then-current NAV per share with stockholder approval, if:

it is determined that any such sales would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders by (1) a majority of the Company’s independent directors and (2) a majority of the Company’s directors who have no financial interest in the proposal (such approvals together, a “required majority of directors”); and

a required majority of directors, in consultation with the underwriter or underwriters of the offering, if it is underwritten, have determined in good faith, and as of a time immediately prior to the first solicitation by or on behalf of the Company of a firm commitment to purchase shares or immediately prior to the issuance of shares, that the price at which shares are to be sold is not less than a price which closely approximates the market value for shares, less any distributing commission or discount.

44


Without the approval of stockholders to offer and sell Shares at prices below NAV per Share, the Company would be prohibited from selling Shares to raise capital when the market price for Shares is below the then-current NAV per Share.

Board Approval

The Board is recommending that stockholders vote in favor of the Share Issuance Proposal. The Board has concluded that the Share Issuance Proposal is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. In doing so, the Board, including the independent directors, considered and evaluated various factors, including the following, as discussed more fully below:

possible long-term benefits to the Company’s stockholders; and

possible dilution to the Company’s NAV per Share under various hypothetical scenarios.

In determining whether or not to offer and sell the Company’s Shares at a price per Share below NAV per Share, the Board has a duty to act in the Company’s best interests and that of stockholders and must comply with the other requirements of Section 63(2) of the 1940 Act. If stockholders of the Company do not approve the Share Issuance Proposal, the Board will consider and evaluate its options to determine what alternatives are in the Company’s best interests and that of the Company’s stockholders.

Reasons to Offer Shares at a Price Below NAV per Share

As a BDC and a regulated investment company (“RIC”) for tax purposes, the Company may want to raise capital through the sale of Shares. RICs generally must distribute substantially all of their earnings from dividends, interest and short-term gains to stockholders in order to achieve pass-through tax treatment, which prevents the Company from using those earnings to support new investments. Further, for the same reason, the Company, in order to borrow money or issue preferred stock, must maintain “asset coverage,” as defined in the 1940 Act, of at least 200%, which generally requires it to finance its investments with at least as much common equity as debt and preferred stock in the aggregate. If the Leverage Proposal is approved by the stockholders, the minimum asset coverage ratio will be reduced from 200% to 150%. Therefore, the Company endeavors to maintain consistent access to capital through the public and private equity markets to enable the Company to raise capital for the Company’s operations, including to repay outstanding indebtedness of the Company, to continue to build the Company’s investment portfolio or for other general corporate purposes, as and when the Board believes it is in the Company’s best interests and that of stockholders.

The Company believes that market conditions may from time to time provide attractive opportunities to deploy capital, including at times when the Shares may be trading at a price below NAV per Share. For example, during the global financial crisis of 2008 and for several years afterward, the global capital markets experienced a period of disruption as evidenced by a lack of liquidity in the debt capital markets, significant write-offs in the financial services sector, there-pricing of credit risk in the broadly syndicated credit market and the failure of certain major domestic and international financial institutions. Despite actions of the United States federal government and foreign governments, these events contributed to worsening general economic conditions that materially and adversely impacted the broader financial and credit markets and reduced the availability of debt and equity capital for the market as a whole and financial services firms in particular. During that period of time, many investors sold assets in order to repay debt or meet equity redemption requirements or other obligations. This dynamic created forced selling (which could return should global markets experience future disruption similar to such disruption) that negatively impacted valuations of debt securities in most markets. This negative pressure on valuations contributed to significant unrealized write-downs of debt investments of many finance companies. However, these changes in market conditions also had beneficial effects for capital providers, including more favorable pricing of risk and more creditor-friendly contractual terms. Further, although valuations had partially recovered during that period of time, additional opportunity continued to remain in the secondary market. Accordingly, for those firms that continued to have access to capital, such an environment had

45


the potential to provide investment opportunities on more favorable terms than would otherwise have been available. The Company’s ability to take advantage of these opportunities in the future is dependent upon its access to capital.

Even though the underlying performance of a particular portfolio company may not necessarily indicate impairment or its inability to repay all principal and interest in full, the volatility in the debt capital markets may negatively impact the valuations of debt investments and result in further unrealized write-downs of those debt investments. These unrealized write-downs, as well as unrealized write-downs based on the underlying performance of the Company’s portfolio companies, if any, negatively impact stockholders’ equity and the Company’s asset coverage.

Failing to maintain the asset coverage ratio required by the 1940 Act could have severe negative consequences for a BDC, including the inability to pay distributions to its stockholders, breaching debt covenants and failure to qualify for tax treatment as a RIC. Although the Company does not currently expect that it will fail to maintain asset coverage of at least 200% or, if the Leverage Proposal is approved by the stockholders, at least 150%, the markets in which it operates and the general economy remain volatile and uncertain. Continued volatility in the capital markets and the resulting negative pressure on debt investment valuations could negatively impact the Company’s asset valuations, stockholders’ equity and the Company’sdebt-to-equity ratio.

As noted above, market disruption has, in the past, resulted in good opportunities to invest at attractive risk-adjusted returns. However, the extreme volatility and dislocation that the capital markets experienced also materially and adversely impacted the broader financial and credit markets and reduced the availability of debt and equity capital for the market as a whole and financial services firms in particular. If these adverse market conditions return and/or worsen in the future, the Company and other companies in the financial services sector may not have access to sufficient debt and equity capital in order to take advantage of these good investment opportunities. In addition, the debt capital that will be available, if at all, may be at a higher cost and on less favorable terms and conditions in the future.

At times Shares may trade at a discount to NAV per Share and at times Shares may trade at a market price in excess of NAV. The possibility that Shares will trade at a discount to NAV per Share or at premiums that are unsustainable over the long term is a risk separate and distinct from the risk that the Company’s NAV will decrease. It is not possible to predict whether the Shares that may be offered pursuant to the Share Issuance Proposal, if approved, will trade at, above, or below the then-current NAV per Share.

Recent dislocations in the credit markets have led to significant stock market volatility, particularly with respect to the stock of financial services companies. During times of increased price volatility, Shares may trade below the Company’s NAV per Share, which is not uncommon for BDCs. As noted above, however, these periods of market volatility and dislocation created, and may create again, favorable opportunities for the Company to make investments at attractive risk-adjusted returns, including opportunities that, all else being equal, may increase NAV over the longer-term, even if financed with the issuance of Shares at a price below NAV per Share. Stockholder approval of the Share Issuance Proposal, subject to the conditions set forth in the Share Issuance Proposal, would provide the Company with the flexibility to invest in such opportunities and would enable the Company to raise capital for the Company’s operations, including to repay outstanding indebtedness of the Company and for other general corporate purposes.

The Board believes that having the flexibility to issue Shares at a price below NAV per Share in certain instances is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders and would provide added financial flexibility to comply with BDC, RIC and credit facility requirements the Company and its subsidiaries may face from time to time, including the requirement to maintain the required asset coverage ratio under the 1940 Act, and would provide access to capital markets to pursue attractive investment opportunities and/or repay any outstanding indebtedness or for other corporate purposes. The flexibility to issue Shares at a price below the then-current NAV per Share could also minimize the likelihood that the Company would be required to sell assets to raise capital at prices it believed to be less than such assets’ intrinsic values.

46


While the Company has no immediate plans to sell its Shares at a price below NAV per Share, it is seeking stockholder approval of the Share Issuance Proposal in order to maintain access to the markets if the Company determines, following the listing of the Company’s common stock on a national securities exchange, it should sell Shares at a price below NAV per Share, which typically must be undertaken quickly. The final terms of any such sale will be determined by the Board at the time of issuance and the Shares will not include preemptive rights. Also, because the Company has no immediate plans to issue any Shares, it is impracticable to describe the transaction or transactions in which such Shares would be issued. Instead, any transaction where the Company issues such Shares, including the nature and amount of consideration that would be received by the Company at the time of issuance and the use of any such consideration, will be reviewed and approved by the Board at the time of issuance. If the Share Issuance Proposal is approved, no further authorization from the stockholders will be solicited prior to any such issuance in accordance with the terms of the Share Issuance Proposal. If approved, the authorization would be effective for securities issued during the next 12 months following stockholder approval.

Conditions to the Sale of Shares below NAV per Share

If stockholders approve the Share Issuance Proposal, the Company will sell Shares at a price below NAV per Share only if the following conditions are met:

the Company’s common stock has been listed on a national securities exchange;

it is determined that any such sales would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders by a required majority of directors;

a required majority of directors, in consultation with the underwriter or underwriters of the offering, if it is underwritten, have determined in good faith, and as of a time immediately prior to the first solicitation by or on behalf of the Company of a firm commitment to purchase Shares or immediately prior to the issuance of Shares, that the price at which Shares are to be sold is not less than a price which closely approximates the market value for Shares, less any distributing commission or discount; and

the cumulative number of Shares sold pursuant to such authority does not exceed 25% of the Company’s then outstanding Shares immediately prior to each such sale.

Dilution

Before voting on the Share Issuance Proposal or giving proxies with regard to this matter, stockholders should consider the potentially dilutive effect on the Company’s NAV per Share as a result of the issuance of Shares at a price less than NAV per Share. Any sale of Shares by the Company at a price below NAV per Share would result in an immediate dilution to existing stockholders on a per Share basis. This dilution would include reduction in the NAV per Share as a result of the issuance of Shares at a price below NAV per Share and a proportionately greater decrease in a stockholder’s per Share interest in the earnings and assets of the Company and per Share voting interest in the Company. The Board has considered the potential dilutive effect of the issuance of Shares at a price below NAV per Share under various hypothetical scenarios and will consider again such dilutive effect when considering whether to authorize any specific issuance of Shares below NAV per Share.

The 1940 Act establishes a connection between the price at which common stock is sold and NAV because, when common stock is sold at a price per share below NAV per share, the resulting increase in the number of outstanding shares of common stock is not accompanied by a proportionate increase in the net assets of the issuer. Stockholders of the Company should also consider that they will have no subscription, preferential or preemptive rights to shares authorized for issuance, and thus any future issuance of shares at a price below NAV per share would dilute a stockholder’s holdings of shares as a percentage of shares outstanding to the extent the stockholder does not purchase sufficient shares in the offering or otherwise to maintain the stockholder’s

47


percentage interest. Further, if the stockholder does not purchase, or is unable to purchase, any shares to maintain the stockholder’s percentage interest, regardless of whether such offering is at a price above or below the then-current NAV per share, the stockholder’s voting power will be diluted.

The precise extent of any such dilution to the Company’s common stock cannot be estimated before the terms of a common stock offering are set. As a general proposition, however, the amount of potential dilution will increase as the size of the offering increases. Another factor that will influence the amount of dilution resulting from an offering is the amount of net proceeds that the Company receives from such offering. The Board would expect that the net proceeds to the Company will be equal to the price that investors pay per Share, less the amount of any underwriting discounts and commissions—typically approximately 95% of the market price.

The following examples indicate how an offering would immediately affect the NAV per Share of the Company’s common stock based on the assumptions set forth below. The examples do not include any effects or influence on the market price for Shares due to changes in investment performance over time, distribution policy, increased trading volume or other qualitative aspects of the Shares.

Examples of Dilutive Effect of the Issuance of Shares at a Price Below NAV per Share

Impact on Existing Stockholders who do not Participate in the Offering

Existing stockholders of the Company who do not participate, or who are not given the opportunity to participate, in an offering below NAV per Share by the Company or who do not buy additional Shares in the secondary market at the same or lower price obtained by the Company in the offering (after expenses and any underwriting discounts and commissions) face the greatest potential risks. All stockholders will experience an immediate decrease (often called dilution) in the NAV per Share of the Shares they hold. Stockholders who do not participate in the offering will also experience a disproportionately greater decrease in their participation in the Company’s earnings and assets and their voting power than stockholders who do participate in the offering. All stockholders may also experience a decline in the market price of their Shares, which often reflects, to some degree, announced or potential increases and decreases in NAV per Share. A decrease could be more pronounced as the size of the offering and level of discounts increase.

The following examples illustrate the level of NAV per Share dilution that would be experienced by a nonparticipating stockholder in four different hypothetical common stock offerings of different sizes and levels of discount to NAV per Share, although it is not possible to predict the level of market price decline that may also occur. Actual sales prices and discounts may differ from the presentation below.

48


The examples assume that Entity XYZ has 1,000,000 shares of common stock outstanding, $15,000,000 in total assets and $5,000,000 in total liabilities. The current NAV and NAV per share are thus $10,000,000 and $10.00, respectively. The table below illustrates the dilutive effect on nonparticipating stockholder A of (1) an offering of 50,000 shares (5% of the outstanding shares) at $9.50 per share after offering expenses and any underwriting discounts and commissions (a 5% discount to NAV per share); (2) an offering of 100,000 shares (10% of the outstanding shares) at $9.00 per share after offering expenses and any underwriting discounts and commissions (a 10% discount to NAV per share); and (3) an offering of 200,000 shares (20% of the outstanding shares) at $8.00 per share after offering expenses and any underwriting discounts and commissions (a 20% discount to NAV per share).

   Prior to
Sale Below
NAV per
Share
  Example 1
5% offering at
5% Discount
  Example 2
10% offering at
10% Discount
  Example 3
20% offering at
20% Discount
 
 Following
Sale
  %
Change
  Following
Sale
  %
Change
  Following
Sale
  %
Change
 

Offering Price

        

Price per Share to Public

   —    $10.05   —    $9.52   —    $8.47   —   

Net Proceeds per Share to Issuer

   —    $9.50   —    $9.00   —    $8.00   —   

Decrease to NAV per Share

        

Total Shares Outstanding

   1,000,000   1,050,000   5.00  1,000,000   10.00  1,200,000   20.00

NAV per Share

  $10.00  $9.98   (0.20)%  $9.91   (0.90)%  $9.67   (3.30)% 

Dilution to Stockholder

        

Shares Held by Stockholder A

   10,000   10,000   —     10,000   —     10,000   —   

Percentage Held by Stockholder A

   1.00  0.95  (5.00)%   0.91  (9.00)%   0.83  (17.00)% 

Total Asset Values

        

Total NAV Held by Stockholder A

  $100,000  $99,800   (0.20)%  $99,100   (0.90)%  $95,700   (3.30)% 
   Prior to
Sale Below
NAV per
Share
  Example 1
5% offering at
5% Discount
  Example 2
10% offering at
10% Discount
  Example 3
20% offering at
20% Discount
 
 Following
Sale
  %
Change
  Following
Sale
  %
Change
  Following
Sale
  %
Change
 

Total Investment by Stockholder A (Assumed to be $10.00 per Share)

  $100,000  $100,000   —    $100,000   —    $100,000   —   

Total Dilution to Stockholder A (Total NAV Less Total Investment)

   —    $(200  —    $(900  —    $(3,300  —   

Per Share Amounts

        

NAV per Share Held by Stockholder A

   —    $9.98   —    $9.91   —    $9.67   —   

Investments per Share Held by Stockholder A (Assumed to be $10.00 per Share on Shares Held Prior to Sale)

  $10.00  $10.00   —    $10.00   —    $10.00   —   

Dilution per Share Held by Stockholder A (NAV per Share Less Investment per Share)

   —    $(0.02  —    $(0.09  —    $(0.33  —   

Percentage Dilution to Stockholder A (Dilution per Share Divided by Investment per Share)

   —     —     (0.20)%   —     (0.90)%   —     (3.30)% 

Impact on Existing Stockholders who Participate in the Offering

An existing stockholder of the Company who participates in an offering by the Company of Shares at a price below NAV per Share or who buys additional Shares in the secondary market at the same or lower price as obtained by the Company in an offering (after expenses and any underwriting discounts and commissions) will experience the same types of NAV per Share dilution as the nonparticipating stockholders, albeit at a lower level, to the extent they purchase less than the same percentage of the discounted offering as their interest in the Shares immediately prior to the offering. The level of NAV per Share dilution on an aggregate basis will decrease as the number of Shares such stockholders purchase increases. Existing stockholders of the Company who buy more than such percentage will experience NAV per Share dilution, but will, in contrast to existing stockholders of the Company who purchase less than their proportionate share of the offering, experience an increase (often called accretion) in NAV per share over their investment per share and will also experience a disproportionately greater increase in their participation in the Company’s earnings and assets and their voting power than the Company’s

49


increase in assets, potential earning power and voting interests due to the offering. The level of accretion will increase as the excess number of shares such stockholder purchases increases. Even a stockholder who over-participates will, however, be subject to the risk that the Company may make additional discounted offerings in the future in which such stockholder does not participate, in which case such stockholder will experience NAV per share dilution as described above in such subsequent offerings. These stockholders may also experience a decline in the market price of their shares, which often reflects, to some degree, announced or potential increases and decreases in NAV per share. Their decrease could be more pronounced as the size of the Company’s offering and level of discount to NAV per share increases.

The following examples assume that Entity XYZ has 1,000,000 shares of common stock outstanding, $15,000,000 in total assets and $5,000,000 in total liabilities. The current NAV and NAV per share are thus $10,000,000 and $10.00, respectively. The table below illustrates the dilutive and accretive effect in the hypothetical 20% discount offering from the prior chart for stockholder A that acquires shares equal to (1) 50% of their proportionate share of the offering (i.e., 1,000 shares, which is 0.50% of the offering of 200,000 shares rather than their 1.00% proportionate share) and (2) 150% of their proportionate share of the offering (i.e., 3,000 shares, which is 1.50% of the offering of 200,000 shares rather than their 1.00% proportionate share). The Company’s prospectus pursuant to which any offering of Shares by the Company at a price less than the then-current NAV per share is made will include a chart for its example based on the actual number of shares in such offering and the actual discount to the most recently determined NAV per share.

   50% Participation  150% Participation    
   Prior to Sale
Below NAV
per Share
  Following
Sale
  %
Change
  Following
Sale
  %
Change
 

Offering Price

      

Price per share to public

   —    $8.47   —    $8.47   —   

Net proceeds per share to issuer

   —    $8.00   —    $8.00   —   

Increases in shares and Decrease to NAV per share

      

Total shares outstanding

   1,000,000   1,200,000   20.00  1,200,000   20.00

NAV per share

  $10.00  $9.67   (3.30) $9.67   (3.30)

(Dilution)/Accretion to Participating Stockholder A

      

Shares held by stockholder A

   10,000   11,000   10.00  13,000   30.00

Percentage held by stockholder A

   1.0  0.92  (8.00)  1.08  8.00

Total Asset Values

      

Total NAV held by stockholder A

  $100,000  $106,370   6.37 $125,710   25.71

Total investment by stockholder A (assumed to be $10.00 per share on shares held prior to sale)

  $100,000  $108,470   8.47 $125,410   25.41

Total (dilution)/accretion to stockholder A (total NAV less total investment)

   —     (2,100  —    $300   —   

Per Share Amounts

      

NAV per share held by stockholder A

   —    $9.67   —    $9.67   —   

Investment per share held by stockholder A (assumed to be $10.00 per share on shares held prior to sale)

  $10.00  $9.86   (1.40) $9.65   (3.50)

(Dilution)/accretion per share held by stockholder A (NAV per share less investment per share)

   —    $(0.19  —    $0.02   —   

Percentage (dilution)/accretion to stockholder A (dilution/ accretion per share divided by investment per share)

   —     —     (1.93)  —     0.21

Other Considerations

In reaching its recommendation to stockholders to approve the Share Issuance Proposal, the Board considered a possible source of conflict of interest due to the fact that the proceeds from the issuance of additional Shares may increase the management fees that the Company pays to the Advisor as such fees are partially based on the value of the Company’s gross assets. The Board, including the independent directors, concluded that, prior to approving any issuance of Shares below NAV per Share, it would determine that the

50


benefits to the Company’s stockholders from increasing the Company’s capital base or from other uses would outweigh any detriment from increased management fees.

Potential Investors

The Company has not solicited any potential buyers of the Shares that it may elect to issue in any future offering of Shares to comply with the federal securities laws. No Shares are earmarked for management or other affiliated persons of the Company. However, members of the Company’s management and other affiliated persons may participate in an offering of Shares by the Company on the same terms as others.

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE

“FOR” THE SHARE ISSUANCE PROPOSAL.

51


SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

A stockholder who intends to present a proposal at the Company’s 2021 annual meeting of stockholders, including nomination of a director, must submit the proposal in writing to the Secretary of the Company at FS KKR Capital Corp. II, 201 Rouse Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19112, and the Company must receive the proposal no later than [●], 2021 in order for the proposal to be considered for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement for that meeting (or if the 2021 annual meeting is held more than 30 days before or after the first anniversary of the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders, the Company must receive such proposal within a reasonable time prior to the Company beginning to print and distribute proxy materials for such meeting).

Notices of intention to present proposals, including nomination of a director, at the Company’s 2021 annual meeting of stockholders should be addressed to the Secretary of the Company and should be received by the Company between [●], 2021 and 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on [•], 2021, which such dates are the 120th day and the 90th day, respectively, prior to the first anniversary of the date that the Company’s proxy statement was released to stockholders for the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders. In the event that the date of the Company’s 2021 annual meeting of stockholders is advanced or delayed by more than 30 days from the first anniversary of the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders, a notice by the stockholder to be timely must be so delivered not earlier than the 120th day prior to the date of mailing of the notice of the 2021 annual meeting of stockholders and not later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on the later of the 90th day prior to the date of mailing of the notice of the 2021 annual meeting of stockholders or the tenth day following the day on which public announcement of the date of the 2021 annual meeting of stockholders is first made. The submission of a proposal does not guarantee its inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement or presentation at a meeting unless certain securities law requirements are met. The Company reserves the right to reject, rule out of order, or take other appropriate action with respect to any proposal that does not comply with the foregoing or other applicable requirements.

OTHER MATTERS TO COME BEFORE THE MEETING

The Board is not aware of any matters that will be presented for action at the Annual Meeting other than the matters set forth herein. Should any other matters requiring a vote of stockholders arise, it is intended that the proxies that do not contain specific instructions to the contrary will be voted in accordance with the judgment of the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy.

52


INVESTMENT ADVISER AND ADMINISTRATOR

ANDCO-ADMINISTRATOR

Set forth below are the names and addresses of the Company’s investment adviser and administrator andco-administrator:

INVESTMENT ADVISER

AND ADMINISTRATOR

Sub-AdviserCO-ADMINISTRATOR or the Corporation in connection with administering the Corporation’s business, including expenses incurred by the Adviser or anySub-Adviser in performing administrative services for the Corporation

FS/KKR Advisor, LLC

201 Rouse Boulevard

Philadelphia, PA 19112

State Street Bank and administrative personnel paid by the Adviser or anySub-Adviser, to the extent they are not controlling persons of the Adviser, anySub-Adviser or any of their respective affiliates; and any expenses incurred outside of the ordinary course of business, including, without limitation, costs incurred in connection with any claim, litigation, arbitration, mediation, government investigation or similar proceeding and indemnification expenses as provided for in the Articles or the Bylaws.Trust Company

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Corporation shall not be liable for Organization and Offering Costs to the extent that Organization and Offering Costs, together with all prior Organization and Offering Costs, exceed 1.5% of the aggregate gross proceeds from the offering of the Corporation’s securities.One Lincoln Street, Mailstop SUM 0703

Boston, MA 02111

PLEASE VOTE PROMPTLY BY SIGNING AND DATING THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AND RETURNING IT IN THE ACCOMPANYING POSTAGE PAID RETURN ENVELOPE OR BY FOLLOWING THE INSTRUCTIONS PRINTED ON THE PROXY CARD, WHICH PROVIDES INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORIZING A PROXY BY TELEPHONE OR THROUGH THE INTERNET. NO POSTAGE IS REQUIRED IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES.

53


FS KKR CAPITAL CORP. II

201 Rouse Boulevard

PHILADELPHIA, PA 19112

LOGO

 

4


The following provisions in thisSection 2(c) shall apply for only so long as shares of Common Stock are not listed on a national securities exchange.

(c)    Limitations on Reimbursement of Expenses.

(i)    In addition to the compensation paid to the Adviser pursuant toSection 3, the Corporation shall reimburse the Adviser for all expenses of the Corporation incurred by the Adviser as well as the actual cost of goods and services used for or by the Corporation and obtained from entities not affiliated with the Adviser. The Adviser may be reimbursed for the administrative services performed by it on behalf of the Corporation; provided, however, the reimbursement shall be an amount equal to the lower of the Adviser’s actual cost or the amount the Corporation would be required to pay third parties for the provision of comparable administrative services in the same geographic location; and provided, further, that such costs are reasonably allocated to the Corporation on the basis of assets, revenues, time allocations and/or other reasonable metrics consistent with past practice. No reimbursement shall be permitted for services for which the Adviser is entitled to compensation by way of a separate fee. Excluded from the allowable reimbursement shall be:

(A)    rent or depreciation, utilities, capital equipment, and other administrative items of the Adviser; and

(B)    salaries, fringe benefits, travel expenses and other administrative items incurred by or allocated to any controlling person (as defined in the Investment Company Act) of the Adviser (or any individual performing such services) or a holder of 10% or greater equity interest in the Adviser (or any person having the power to direct or cause the direction of the Adviser, whether by ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise).

(d)    Periodic Reimbursement. Expenses incurred by the Adviser on behalf of the Corporation and payable pursuant to thisSection 2 shall be reimbursed no less than monthly to the Adviser. The Adviser shall prepare a statement documenting the expenses of the Corporation and the calculation of the reimbursement and shall deliver such statement to the Corporation prior to full reimbursement.

3.Compensation of the Adviser.

The Corporation agrees to pay, and the Adviser agrees to accept, as compensation for the services provided by the Adviser herein, a base management fee (the “Base Management Fee”) and an incentive fee (the “Incentive Fee”) as hereinafter set forth. Any of the fees payable to the Adviser under this Agreement for any partial month or calendar quarter shall be appropriately prorated. The Adviser may agree to temporarily or permanently waive, in whole or in part, the Base Management Fee and/or the Incentive Fee. See Appendix A for examples of how these fees are calculated. Prior to the payment of any fee to the Adviser, the Corporation shall obtain written instructions from the Adviser with respect to any waiver or deferral of any portion of such fees. Any portion of a deferred fee payable to the Adviser and not paid over to the Adviser with respect to any month, calendar quarter or year shall be deferred without interest and may be paid over in any such other month prior to the termination of this Agreement, as the Adviser may determine upon written notice to the Corporation. The base management fee and incentive fee under the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement are equal to the Base Management Fee and Incentive Fee payable to the Adviser hereunder.

(a)    Base Management Fee. The Base Management Fee shall be calculated at an annual rate of 0.75% of the Corporation’s average weekly gross assets. The Base Management Fee shall be payable quarterly in arrears, and shall be calculated based on the average weekly value of the Corporation’s gross assets during the most recently completed calendar quarter. All or any part of the Base Management Fee not taken as to any quarter shall be deferred without interest and may be taken in such other quarter as the Adviser shall determine.

(b)    Incentive Fee. The Incentive Fee shall consist of two parts, as follows:

(i)    The first part of the Incentive Fee, referred to as the “Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income,” shall be calculated and payable quarterly in arrears based on the Corporation’s “Pre-Incentive Fee Net

5


Investment Income” for the immediately preceding quarter. The payment of the Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income shall be subject to a quarterly hurdle rate, expressed as a rate of return on Adjusted Capital (as defined below) at the beginning of the most recently completed calendar quarter, of 1.75% (7.0% annualized) (the “Hurdle Rate”), subject to a “catch up” feature (as described below).

For this purpose, “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income” means interest income, dividend income and any other income (including any other fees, other than fees for providing managerial assistance, such as commitment, origination, structuring, diligence and consulting fees or other fees that the Corporation receives from portfolio companies) accrued during the calendar quarter, minus the Corporation’s operating expenses for the quarter (including the Base Management Fee under this Agreement and the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement, expenses reimbursed to the Adviser under this Agreement and to theCo-Adviser under the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued and outstanding preferred shares, but excluding the Incentive Fee under this Agreement and the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement).Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income includes, in the case of investments with a deferred interest feature (such as original issue discount debt instruments withpayment-in-kind interest and zero coupon securities), accrued income that the Corporation has not yet received in cash.Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not include any realized capital gains, realized capital losses or unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation.

For purposes of this fee, “Adjusted Capital” shall mean cumulative gross proceeds generated from sales of the Corporation’s Common Stock (including proceeds from the Corporation’s distribution reinvestment plan) reduced for distributions fromnon-liquidating dispositions of the Corporation’s investments paid to stockholders and amounts paid for share repurchases pursuant to the Corporation’s share repurchase program.

The calculation of the Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income for each quarter is as follows:

(A)    No Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income shall be payable to the Adviser in any calendar quarter in which the Corporation’sPre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not exceed the Hurdle Rate;

(B)    50% of the Corporation’sPre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, if any, that exceeds the Hurdle Rate but is less than or equal to 2.1875% in any calendar quarter (8.75% annualized) shall be payable to the Adviser. This portion of the Corporation’s Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income is referred to as the “catch up” and is intended to provide the Adviser with an incentive fee of 10.0% on all of the Corporation’sPre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income when the Corporation’sPre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income reaches 2.1875% (8.75% annualized) in any calendar quarter; and

(C)    For any quarter in which the Corporation’sPre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income exceeds 2.1875% (8.75% annualized), the Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income shall equal 10.0% of the amount of the Corporation’sPre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, as the Hurdle Rate andcatch-up will have been achieved;

(ii)    The second part of the Incentive Fee, referred to as the “Incentive Fee on Capital Gains,” shall be an incentive fee on capital gains earned on liquidated investments from the portfolio and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of this Agreement). This fee shall equal 10.0% of the Corporation’s incentive fee capital gains, which shall equal the Corporation’s realized capital gains on a cumulative basis from inception, calculated as of the end of the applicable period, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less 50% of the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive fees.

4.Covenants of the Adviser.

(a)    Adviser Status. The Adviser is registered as an investment adviser under the Advisers Act and covenants that it will maintain such registration. The Adviser agrees that its activities will at all times be in

6


compliance in all material respects with all applicable federal and state laws governing its operations and investments.

The following provisions in thisSection 4 shall apply for only so long as the Common Stock of the Corporation are not listed on a national securities exchange.

(b)    Reports to Stockholders. The Adviser shall prepare or shall cause to be prepared and distributed to stockholders during each year the following reports of the Corporation (either included in a periodic report filed with the SEC or distributed in a separate report):

(i)    Quarterly Reports. Within sixty (60) days of the end of each calendar quarter, a report containing the same financial information contained in the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q filed by the Corporation under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

(ii)    Annual Report. Within one hundred and twenty (120) days after the end of the Corporation’s fiscal year, an annual report containing:

(A)    A balance sheet as of the end of each fiscal year and statements of income, equity, and cash flow, for the year then ended, all of which shall be prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and accompanied by an auditor’s report containing an opinion of an independent certified public accountant;

(B)    A report of the activities of the Corporation during the period covered by the report;

(C)    Where forecasts have been provided to the Corporation’s stockholders, a table comparing the forecasts previously provided with the actual results during the period covered by the report; and

(D)    A report setting forth distributions by the Corporation for the period covered thereby and separately identifying distributions from (i) cash flow from operations during the period; (ii) cash flow from operations during a prior period which have been held as reserves; and (iii) proceeds from disposition of the Corporation’s assets.

(iii)    Previous Reimbursement Reports. The Adviser shall prepare or shall cause to be prepared a report, prepared in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants United States Auditing Standards relating to special reports, and distributed to stockholders not less than annually, containing an itemized list of the costs reimbursed to the Adviser pursuant toSection 2(c) for the previous fiscal year. The special report shall at a minimum provide:

(A)    A review of the time allocations of individual employees, the costs of whose services were reimbursed; and

(B)    A review of the specific nature of the work performed by each such employee.

(iv)    Proposed Reimbursement Reports. The Adviser shall prepare or shall cause to be prepared a report containing an itemized estimate of all proposed expenses for which it shall receive reimbursements pursuant toSection 2(c) of this Agreement for the next fiscal year, together with a breakdown by year of such expenses reimbursed in each of the last five public programs formed by the Adviser.

(c)    Reports to Administrators. The Adviser shall, upon written request of any Administrator, submit any of the reports and statements to be prepared and distributed by it pursuant to thisSection 4 to such Administrator.

(d)    Reserves. In performing its duties hereunder, the Adviser shall cause the Corporation to provide for adequate reserves for normal replacements and contingencies (but not for payment of fees payable to the Adviser hereunder) by causing the Corporation to retain a reasonable percentage of proceeds from offerings and revenues.

(e)    Recommendations Regarding Reviews. From time to time and not less than quarterly, the Adviser must review the Corporation’s accounts to determine whether cash distributions are appropriate. The Corporation may, subject to authorization by the Board, distribute pro rata to the stockholders funds received by the Corporation which the Adviser deems unnecessary to retain in the Corporation.

7


(f)    Temporary Investments. The Adviser shall, in its sole discretion, temporarily place proceeds from offerings by the Corporation into short term, highly liquid investments which, in its reasonable judgment, afford appropriate safety of principal during such time as it is determining the composition and allocation of the portfolio of the Corporation and the nature, timing and implementation of any changes thereto pursuant toSection 1(b); provided however, that the Adviser shall be under no fiduciary obligation to select any such short-term, highly liquid investment based solely on any yield or return of such investment. The Adviser shall cause any proceeds of the offering of the Corporation’s securities not committed for investment within the later of two (2) years from the initial date of effectiveness of the Registration Statement or one year from termination of the offering, unless a longer period is permitted by the applicable Administrator, to be paid as a distribution to the stockholders of the Corporation as a return of capital without deduction of Front End Fees (as defined below).

5.Brokerage Commissions, Limitations on Front End Fees.

(a)    Brokerage Commissions. The Adviser, in coordination with theCo-Adviser, is hereby authorized, to the fullest extent now or hereafter permitted by law, to cause the Corporation to pay a member of a national securities exchange, broker or dealer an amount of commission for effecting a securities transaction in excess of the amount of commission another member of such exchange, broker or dealer would have charged for effecting that transaction, if the Adviser, in coordination with theCo-Adviser, determines in good faith, taking into account such factors as price (including the applicable brokerage commission or dealer spread), size of order, difficulty of execution, and operational facilities of the firm and the firm’s risk and skill in positioning blocks of securities, that such amount of commission is reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage and/or research services provided by such member, broker or dealer, viewed in terms of either that particular transaction or its overall responsibilities with respect to the Corporation’s portfolio, and is consistent with the Adviser’s andCo-Adviser’s duty to seek the best execution on behalf of the Corporation.

The following provisions in thisSection 5 shall apply for only so long as the Common Stock of the Corporation are not listed on a national securities exchange.

(b)    Limitations. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary:

(i)    All fees and expenses paid by any party for any services rendered to organize the Corporation and to acquire assets for the Corporation (“Front End Fees”) shall be reasonable and shall not exceed 15% of the gross offering proceeds, regardless of the source of payment. Any reimbursement to the Adviser or any other person for deferred organizational and offering costs, including any interest thereon, if any, will be included within this 15% limitation.

(ii)    The Adviser shall commit at leasteighty-two percent (82%) of the gross offering proceeds towards the investment or reinvestment of assets and reserves as set forth inSection 4(d) above on behalf of the Corporation. The remaining proceeds may be used to pay Front End Fees.

6.Other Activities of the Adviser.

The services provided by the Adviser to the Corporation are not exclusive, and the Adviser may engage in any other business or render similar or different services to others including, without limitation, the direct or indirect sponsorship or management of other investment based accounts or commingled pools of capital, however structured, having investment objectives similar to those of the Corporation, so long as its services to the Corporation hereunder are not impaired thereby, and nothing in this Agreement shall limit or restrict the right of any manager, partner, member (including its members and the owners of its members), officer or employee of the Adviser to engage in any other business or to devote his or her time and attention in part to any other business, whether of a similar or dissimilar nature, or to receive any fees or compensation in connection therewith (including fees for serving as a director of, or providing consulting services to, one or more of the Corporation’s portfolio companies, subject to applicable law). The Adviser assumes no responsibility under this Agreement other than to render the services called for hereunder. It is understood that directors, officers,

8


employees and stockholders of the Corporation are or may become interested in the Adviser and its affiliates, as directors, officers, employees, partners, stockholders, members, managers or otherwise, and that the Adviser and directors, officers, employees, partners, stockholders, members and managers of the Adviser and its affiliates are or may become similarly interested in the Corporation as stockholders or otherwise.

7.Responsibility of Dual Directors, Officers and/or Employees.

If any person who is a manager, partner, member, officer or employee of the Adviser is or becomes a director, officer and/or employee of the Corporation and acts as such in any business of the Corporation, then such manager, partner, member, officer and/or employee of the Adviser shall be deemed to be acting in such capacity solely for the Corporation, and not as a manager, partner, member, officer or employee of the Adviser or under the control or direction of the Adviser, even if paid by the Adviser.

8.Indemnification; Limitation of Liability.

(a)    Indemnification. The Adviser and anySub-Adviser (and their officers, managers, partners, members (and their members, including the owners of their members), agents, employees, controlling persons (as defined in the Investment Company Act) and any other person or entity affiliated with, or acting on behalf of, the Adviser orSub-Adviser) (each, an “Indemnified Party and, collectively, the “Indemnified Parties”), shall not be liable to the Corporation for any action taken or omitted to be taken by any such Indemnified Party in connection with the performance of any of its duties or obligations under this Agreement or otherwise as an investment adviser of the Corporation (except to the extent specified in Section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act concerning loss resulting from a breach of fiduciary duty (as the same is finally determined by judicial proceedings) with respect to the receipt of compensation for services), and the Corporation shall indemnify, defend and protect the Indemnified Parties (each of whom shall be deemed a third party beneficiary hereof) and hold them harmless from and against all damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) (“Losses”) incurred by the Indemnified Parties in or by reason of any pending, threatened or completed action, suit, investigation or other proceeding (including an action or suit by or in the right of the Corporation or its security holders) arising out of or otherwise based upon the performance of any of the Indemnified Parties’ duties or obligations under this Agreement, anySub-Advisory Agreement or otherwise as an investment adviser of the Corporation, to the extent such Losses are not fully reimbursed by insurance, and to the extent that such indemnification would not be inconsistent with the laws of the State of Maryland, the Investment Company Act or other applicable law, the Articles or the provisions of Section II.G of the Omnibus Guidelines published by the North American Securities Administrators Association on March 29, 1992, as it may be amended from time to time. In addition, notwithstanding any of the foregoing to the contrary, the provisions of thisSection 8 shall not be construed so as to provide for the indemnification of any Indemnified Party for any liability (including liability under federal securities laws which, under certain circumstances, impose liability even on persons that act in good faith), to the extent (but only to the extent) that such indemnification would be in violation of applicable law, but shall be construed so as to effectuate the provisions of thisSection 8 to the fullest extent permitted by law.

The following provisions in thisSection 8 shall apply for only so long as the Common Stock of the Corporation are not listed on a national securities exchange.

(b)    Limitations on Indemnification. NotwithstandingSection 8(a) to the contrary, the Corporation shall not provide for indemnification of the Indemnified Parties for any Loss suffered by the Indemnified Parties, nor shall the Corporation provide that any of the Indemnified Parties be held harmless for any Loss suffered by the Corporation, unless all of the following conditions are met:

(i)    the Indemnified Party has determined, in good faith, that the course of conduct which caused the Loss was in the best interests of the Corporation;

(ii)    the Indemnified Party was acting on behalf of or performing services for the Corporation;

9


(iii)    such Loss was not the result of negligence or misconduct by the Indemnified Party; and

(iv)    such indemnification or agreement to hold harmless is recoverable only out of the Corporation’s net assets and not from stockholders.

Furthermore, the Indemnified Party shall not be indemnified for any Losses arising from or out of an alleged violation of federal or state securities laws unless one or more of the following conditions are met:

(i)    there has been a successful adjudication on the merits of each count involving alleged securities law violations;

(ii)    such claims have been dismissed with prejudice on the merits by a court of competent jurisdiction; or

(iii)    a court of competent jurisdiction approves a settlement of the claims against a particular indemnitee and finds that indemnification of the settlement and related costs should be made, and the court of law considering the request for indemnification has been advised of the position of the SEC and the published position of any state securities regulatory authority in which securities of the Corporation were offered or sold as to indemnification for violations of securities laws.

(c)    Advancement of Funds. The Corporation shall be permitted to advance funds to the Indemnified Party for legal expenses and other costs incurred as a result of any legal action for which indemnification is being sought and will do so if:

(i)    the proceeding relates to acts or omissions with respect to the performance of duties or services on behalf of the Corporation;

(ii)    the Indemnified Party provides the Corporation with written affirmation of his or her good faith belief that the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification by the Corporation has been met;

(iii)    the legal proceeding was initiated by a third party who is not a stockholder or, if by a stockholder of the Corporation acting in his or her capacity as such, a court of competent jurisdiction approves such advancement; and

(iv)    the Indemnified Party provides the Corporation with a written agreement to repay the amount paid or reimbursed by the Corporation, together with the applicable legal rate of interest thereon, in cases in which such Indemnified Party is found not to be entitled to indemnification.

9.Duration and Termination of Agreement.

(a)    Term. This Agreement shall remain in effect for two (2) years commencing on the date hereof, and thereafter shall continue automatically for successive annual periods, provided that such continuance is specifically approved at least annually by (i) the vote of the Board, or by the vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Corporation and (ii) the vote of a majority of the Corporation’s directors who are not parties to this Agreement or “interested persons” (as such term is defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act) of any such party (“Independent Directors”), in accordance with the requirements of the Investment Company Act.

(b)    Termination. This Agreement may be terminated at any time, without the payment of any penalty, upon sixty (60) days’ written notice (i) by the Corporation to the Adviser, (x) upon the vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Corporation (within the meaning of Section 2(a)(42) of the Investment Company Act), or (y) by the vote of the Corporation’s Independent Directors, or (ii) by the Adviser to the Corporation. This Agreement shall automatically terminate in the event of (x) its “assignment” (as such term is defined for purposes of Section 15(a)(4) of the Investment Company Act), or (y) the effectiveness of an Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement by and between the Corporation and FS/KKR Advisor, LLC. The provisions ofSection 8 of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, and the Adviser shall remain entitled to the benefits thereof, notwithstanding any termination of this Agreement.

10


(c)    Payments to and Duties of Adviser Upon Termination.

(i)    After the termination of this Agreement, the Adviser shall not be entitled to compensation or reimbursement for further services provided hereunder, except that it shall be entitled to receive from the Corporation within thirty (30) days after the effective date of such termination all unpaid reimbursements and all earned but unpaid fees payable to the Adviser prior to termination of this Agreement.

(ii)    The Adviser shall promptly upon termination:

(A)    Deliver to the Board a full accounting, including a statement showing all payments collected by it and a statement of all money held by it, covering the period following the date of the last accounting furnished to the Board;

(B)    Deliver to the Board all assets and documents of the Corporation then in custody of the Adviser; and

(C)    Cooperate with the Corporation to provide an orderly management transition.

The following provisions in thisSection 9 shall apply for only so long as the Common Stock of the Corporation are not listed on a national securities exchange.

(d)    Other Matters. Without the approval of holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock entitled to vote on the matter, the Adviser shall not: (i) amend this Agreement except for amendments that do not adversely affect the interests of the stockholders; (ii) voluntarily withdraw as the Adviser unless such withdrawal would not affect the tax status of the Corporation and would not materially adversely affect the stockholders; (iii) appoint a new Adviser; (iv) sell all or substantially all of the Corporation’s assets other than in the ordinary course of the Corporation’s business; or (v) cause the merger or other reorganization of the Corporation. In the event that the Adviser should withdraw pursuant to (ii) above, the withdrawing Adviser shall pay all expenses incurred as a result of its withdrawal. The Corporation may terminate the Adviser’s interest in the Corporation’s revenues, expenses, income, losses, distributions and capital by payment of an amount equal to the then present fair market value of the terminated Adviser’s interest, determined by agreement of the terminated Adviser and the Corporation. If the Corporation and the Adviser cannot agree upon such amount, then such amount will be determined in accordance with the then current rules of the American Arbitration Association. The expenses of such arbitration shall be borne equally by the terminated Adviser and the Corporation. The method of payment to the terminated Adviser must be fair and must protect the solvency and liquidity of the Corporation.

10.Conflicts of Interests and Prohibited Activities.

The following provisions in thisSection 10 shall apply for only so long as the Common Stock of the Corporation are not listed on a national securities exchange.

(a)    No Exclusive Agreement. The Adviser is not hereby granted or entitled to an exclusive right to sell or exclusive employment to sell assets for the Corporation.

(b)    Rebates, Kickbacks and Reciprocal Arrangements.

The Adviser agrees that it shall not (A) receive or accept any rebate,give-up or similar arrangement that is prohibited under applicable federal or state securities laws, (B) participate in any reciprocal business arrangement that would circumvent provisions of applicable federal or state securities laws governing conflicts of interest or investment restrictions, or (C) enter into any agreement, arrangement or understanding that would circumvent the restrictions against dealing with affiliates or promoters under applicable federal or state securities laws.

The Adviser agrees that it shall not directly or indirectly pay or award any fees or commissions or other compensation to any person or entity engaged to sell the Corporation’s Common Stock or give investment advice

11


to a potential stockholder; provided, however, that this subsection shall not prohibit the payment to a registered broker-dealer or other properly licensed agent of sales commissions for selling or distributing the Corporation’s Common Stock.

(c)    Commingling. The Adviser covenants that it shall not permit or cause to be permitted the Corporation’s funds to be commingled with the funds of any other entity. Nothing in thisSection 10(c) shall prohibit the Adviser from establishing a master fiduciary account pursuant to which separatesub-trust accounts are established for the benefit of affiliated programs, provided that the Corporation’s funds are protected from the claims of other programs and creditors of such programs.

11.Proxy Voting.

The Adviser, in coordination with theCo-Adviser, will exercise voting rights on any assets held in the portfolio securities of portfolio companies. The Adviser is obligated to furnish to the Corporation, in a timely manner, a record of all proxies voted in such form and format that complies with applicable federal statutes and regulations.

12.Notices.

Any notice under this Agreement shall be given in writing, addressed and delivered or mailed, postage prepaid, to the other party at its principal office.

13.Amendments.

This Agreement may be amended in writing by mutual consent of the parties hereto, subject to the provisions of the Investment Company Act and the Articles.

14.Entire Agreement; Governing Law.

This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes all prior agreements, understandings and arrangements with respect to the subject matter hereof. Notwithstanding the place where this Agreement may be executed by any of the parties hereto, this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. For so long as the Corporation is regulated as a BDC under the Investment Company Act, this Agreement shall also be construed in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Investment Company Act. In such case, to the extent the applicable laws of the State of New York, or any of the provisions herein, conflict with the provisions of the Investment Company Act, the latter shall control.

15.Severability.

If any provision of this Agreement shall be declared illegal, invalid or unenforceable in any jurisdiction, then such provision shall be deemed to be severable from this Agreement (to the extent permitted by law) and in any event such illegality, invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the remainder hereof.

16.Counterparts.

This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original copy and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument binding on all parties hereto, notwithstanding that all parties shall not have signed the same counterpart.

17.Third Party Beneficiaries.

Except for anySub-Adviser (with respect toSection 8) and any Indemnified Party, suchSub-Adviser and the Indemnified Parties each being an intended beneficiary of this Agreement, this Agreement is for the sole

12


benefit of the parties hereto and their permitted assigns and nothing herein express or implied shall give or be construed to give to any person, other than the parties hereto and such assigns, any legal or equitable rights hereunder.

18.Survival.

The provisions ofSections 8,9(b),9(c),14,17 and thisSection 18 shall survive termination of this Agreement.

19.Insurance.

Subject to the requirements of Rule17d-1(d)(7) under the Investment Company Act, the Corporation shall acquire and maintain a directors and officers liability insurance policy or similar insurance policy, which may name the Adviser,Co-Adviser and anySub-Adviser each as an additional insured party (each an “Additional Insured Party” and collectively the “Additional Insured Parties”). Such insurance policy shall include reasonable coverage from a reputable insurer. The Corporation shall make all premium payments required to maintain such policy in full force and effect;provided,however, each Additional Insured Party, if any, shall pay to the Corporation, in advance of the due date of such premium, its allocated share of the premium. Irrespective of whether the Adviser,Co-Adviser and anySub-Adviser is a named Additional Insured Party on such policy, the Corporation shall provide the Adviser,Co-Adviser and anySub-Adviser with written notice upon receipt of any notice of: (a) any default under such policy; (b) any pending or threatened termination, cancellation ornon-renewal of such policy or (c) any coverage limitation or reduction with respect to such policy. The foregoing provisions of thisSection 19 notwithstanding, the Corporation shall not be required to acquire or maintain any insurance policy to the extent that the same is not available upon commercially reasonable pricing terms or at all, as determined in good faith by the required majority (as defined in Section 57(o) of the Investment Company Act) of the Board.

20.Brand Usage.

The Adviser conducts its investment advisory business under, and owns all rights to, the trademark “FSIC II Advisor” and the “FSIC II Advisor” design (collectively, the “Brand”). In connection with the Corporation’s (a) public filings; (b) requests for information from state and federal regulators; (c) offering materials and advertising materials; and (d) investor communications, the Corporation may state in such materials that investment advisory services are being provided by the Adviser to the Corporation under the terms of this Agreement. The Adviser hereby grants anon-exclusive,non-transferable,non-sublicensable and royalty-free license (the “License”) to the Corporation for the use of the Brand solely as permitted in the foregoing sentence. Prior to using the Brand in any manner, the Corporation shall submit all proposed uses to the Adviser for prior written approval solely to the extent the Corporation’s use of the Brand or any combination or derivation thereof has materially changed from the Corporation’s use of the Brand previously approved by the Adviser. The Adviser reserves the right to terminate the License immediately upon written notice for any reason, including if the usage is not in compliance with its standards and policies. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the term of the License granted under thisSection 20 shall be for the term of this Agreement only, including renewals and extensions, and the right to use the Brand as provided herein shall terminate immediately upon the termination of this Agreement. The Corporation agrees that the Adviser is the sole owner of the Brand, and any and all goodwill in the Brand arising from the Corporation’s use shall inure solely to the benefit of the Adviser. Without limiting the foregoing, the License shall have no effect on the Corporation’s ownership rights of the works within which the Brand shall be used.

[Remainder of page left intentionally blank]

13


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed on the date above written.

FS INVESTMENT CORPORATION II

By:

Name:

Title:

FSIC II ADVISOR, LLC

By:

Name:

Title:

[Signature Page to Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement]


Appendix A

NOTE: All percentages herein refer to Adjusted Capital.

Example 1: Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income for Each Calendar Quarter*

Scenario 1

Assumptions

Investment income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) = 1.25%

Hurdle Rate(1) = 1.75%

Base Management Fee(2) = 0.375%

Other expenses (legal, accounting, custodian, transfer agent, etc.)(3) = 0.2%

Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income

(investment income — (Base Management Fee + other expenses)) = 0.675%

Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not exceed the Hurdle Rate, therefore there is no Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income payable.

Scenario 2

Assumptions

Investment income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) = 2.675%

Hurdle Rate(1) = 1.75%

Base Management Fee(2) = 0.375%

Other expenses (legal, accounting, custodian, transfer agent, etc.)(3) = 0.2%

Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income

(investment income — (Base Management Fee + other expenses)) = 2.1%

Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income = 50% x Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income (subject to “catch-up”)(4)

= 50% x (2.1% — 1.75%)

= 0.175%

Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income exceeds the Hurdle Rate, but does not fully satisfy the “catch-up” provision, therefore the Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income is 0.175%.

Scenario 3

Assumptions

Investment income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) = 3.5%

Hurdle Rate(1) = 1.75%

Base Management Fee(2) = 0.375%

Other expenses (legal, accounting, custodian, transfer agent, etc.)(3) = 0.2%

Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income

(investment income — (Base Management Fee + other expenses)) = 2.925%

Catch up = 50% x Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income (subject to “catch-up”)(4)

Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income = 50% x “catch-up” + (10.0% x (Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income — 2.1875%))

A-1


Catch up          = 2.1875% — 1.75%

     = 0.4375%

Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income = (50% x 0.4375%) + (10.0% x (2.925% — 2.1875%))

     = 0.21875% + (10.0% x 0.7375%)

     = 0.21875% + 0.07375%

     = 0.2925%

Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income exceeds the Hurdle Rate and fully satisfies the “catch-up” provision, therefore the Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income is 0.2925%.

(1)Represents 7.0% annualized Hurdle Rate.
(2)Represents 1.5% annualized Base Management Fee on average weekly gross assets under this Agreement and the Investment Co-Advisory Agreement. Examples assume assets are equal to Adjusted Capital.
(3)Excludes organizational and offering costs.
(4)The “catch-up” provision is intended to provide the Adviser with an Incentive Fee of 10.0% on all Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income when the Corporation’s net investment income exceeds 2.1875% in any calendar quarter.

Example 2: Incentive Fee on Capital Gains*

Scenario 1:

Assumptions

Year 1: $20 million investment made in Company A (“Investment A”), and $30 million investment made in Company B (“Investment B”)

Year 2: Investment A sold for $50 million and fair market value (“FMV”) of Investment B determined to be $32 million

Year 3: FMV of Investment B determined to be $25 million

Year 4: Investment B sold for $31 million

The Incentive Fee on Capital Gains would be:

Year 1: None

Year 2: Incentive Fee on Capital Gains of $3 million ($30 million realized capital gains on sale of Investment A multiplied by 10.0%)

Year 3: None, because $2.5 million (10.0% multiplied by ($30 million cumulative capital gains less $5 million cumulative capital depreciation)) less $3 million (previous capital gain incentive fee paid to the Adviser in Year 2 (and 50% of aggregate capital gain incentive fee paid by the Corporation in Year 2)) is less than $0

Year 4: Incentive Fee on Capital Gains of $100,000, because $3.1 million ($31 million cumulative realized capital gains multiplied by 10.0%) less $3 million (previous capital gain incentive fee paid to the Adviser in Year 2 (and 50% of aggregate capital gain incentive fee paid by the Corporation in Year 2)) is $100,000

A-2


Scenario 2

Assumptions

Year 1: $20 million investment made in Company A (“Investment A”), $30 million investment made in Company B (“Investment B”) and $25 million investment made in Company C (“Investment C”)

Year 2: Investment A sold for $50 million, FMV of Investment B determined to be $25 million and FMV of Investment C determined to be $25 million

Year 3: FMV of Investment B determined to be $27 million and Investment C sold for $30 million

Year 4: FMV of Investment B determined to be $35 million

Year 5: Investment B sold for $20 million

The Incentive Fee on Capital Gains, if any, would be:

Year 1: None

Year 2: $2.5 million Incentive Fee on Capital Gains, because 10.0% multiplied by $25 million ($30 million realized capital gains on Investment A less unrealized capital depreciation on Investment B) is $2.5 million

Year 3: $0.7 million Incentive Fee on Capital Gains, because $3.2 million (10.0% multiplied by $32 million ($35 million cumulative realized capital gains less $3 million unrealized capital depreciation)) less $2.5 million capital gain incentive fee paid to the Adviser in Year 2 (and 50% of aggregate capital gain incentive fee paid by the Corporation in Year 2) is $0.7 million

Year 4: None

Year 5: None, because $2.5 million (10.0% multiplied by $25 million (cumulative realized capital gains of $35 million less realized capital losses of $10 million)) less $3.2 million cumulative capital gain incentive fee paid to the Adviser in Year 2 and Year 3 (and 50% of aggregate capital gain incentive fee paid by the Corporation in Year 2 and Year 3) is less than $0

*The returns shown are for illustrative purposes only. No Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income is payable to the Adviser in any calendar quarter in which the Corporation’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not exceed the Hurdle Rate. Positive returns are shown to demonstrate the fee structure and there is no guarantee that positive returns will be realized. Actual returns may vary from those shown in the examples above.

A-3


EXHIBIT B

INVESTMENT ADVISORY AND

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

FS INVESTMENT CORPORATION II

AND

KKR CREDIT ADVISORS (US) LLC

This Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement (this “Agreement”) is made this [●] day of [●], 2018, by and between FS INVESTMENT CORPORATION II, a Maryland corporation (the “Corporation”), and KKR CREDIT ADVISORS (US) LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Adviser”).

WHEREAS, the Corporation is anon-diversified,closed-end management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”); and

WHEREAS, the Adviser is an investment adviser that has registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”);

WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to retain the Adviser to furnish investment advisory services to the Corporation and to provide for the administrative services necessary for the operation of the Corporation on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, and the Adviser wishes to be retained to provide such services; and

WHEREAS, the Corporation is simultaneously entering into an Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement with FSIC II ADVISOR, LLC (the “Co-Adviser”), dated as of the date hereof (the “InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement”), pursuant to which theCo-Adviser will, as aco-adviser with the Adviser, furnish investment advisory services to the Corporation and provide for the administrative services necessary for the operation of the Corporation on the terms and conditions identical to those set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereby agree as follows:

1.Duties of the Adviser.

(a)    Retention of Adviser. The Corporation hereby appoints the Adviser to act asco-adviser to the Corporation and to manage, in coordination with theCo-Adviser, the investment and reinvestment of the assets of the Corporation, subject to the supervision of the board of directors of the Corporation (the “Board”), for the period and upon the terms herein set forth, in accordance with:

(i)    the investment objectives, policies and restrictions that are set forth in the Corporation’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), as supplemented, amended or superseded from time to time;

(ii)    all other applicable federal and state laws, rules and regulations, and the Corporation’s articles of amendment and restatement (as may be amended from time to time, the “Articles”) and bylaws (as may be amended from time to time, the “Bylaws”); and

(iii)    such investment policies, directives and regulatory restrictions as the Corporation may from time to time establish or issue and communicate to the Adviser in writing.

(b)    Responsibilities of Adviser. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Adviser shall, in coordination with theCo-Adviser, during the term and subject to the provisions of this Agreement:

(i)    determine the composition and allocation of the Corporation’s investment portfolio, the nature and timing of any changes therein and the manner of implementing such changes;


(ii)    identify, evaluate and negotiate the structure of the investments made by the Corporation;

(iii)    execute, monitor and service the Corporation’s investments;

(iv)    place orders with respect to, and arrange for, any investment by the Corporation;

(v)    determine the securities and other assets that the Corporation shall purchase, retain, or sell;

(vi)    perform due diligence on prospective portfolio companies; and

(vii)    provide the Corporation with such other investment advisory, research and related services as the Corporation may, from time to time, reasonably request or require for the investment of its funds.

The Corporation acknowledges that the Adviser andCo-Adviser, may from time to time, designate one or the other as being primarily responsible for certain investments. The Adviser shall have no obligation hereunder to supervise theCo-Adviser’s provision of services under the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement.

(c)    Power and Authority. To facilitate the Adviser’s performance of these undertakings, but subject to the restrictions contained herein, the Corporation hereby delegates to the Adviser (which power and authority may be delegated by the Adviser to one or more Sub-Advisers (as defined below)), and the Adviser hereby accepts, the power and authority to act on behalf of the Corporation, in coordination with theCo-Adviser, to effectuate investment decisions for the Corporation, including the negotiation, execution and delivery of all documents relating to the Corporation’s investments and the placing of orders for other purchase or sale transactions on behalf of the Corporation. In the event that the Corporation determines to acquire debt financing (or to refinance existing debt financing), the Adviser, in coordination with theCo-Adviser, shall seek to arrange for such financing on the Corporation’s behalf, subject to the oversight and approval of the Board. The Corporation also grants to the Adviser, in coordination with theCo-Adviser, power and authority to engage in all activities and transactions (and anything incidental thereto) that the Adviser, in coordination with theCo-Adviser, deems appropriate, necessary or advisable to carry out its duties pursuant to this Agreement, including the authority to provide, on behalf of the Corporation, significant managerial assistance to the Corporation’s portfolio companies to the extent required by the Investment Company Act or otherwise deemed appropriate by the Adviser, in coordination with theCo-Adviser.

(d)    Administrative Services. Subject to the supervision, direction and control of the Board, the provisions of the Articles and Bylaws and applicable federal and state law, the Adviser, in coordination with theCo-Adviser, shall perform, or cause to be performed by other persons, all administrative services in connection with the operation of the Corporation.

(e)    Acceptance of Appointment. The Adviser hereby accepts such appointment and agrees during the term hereof to render the services described herein for the compensation provided herein, subject to the limitations contained herein.

(f)    Sub-Advisers. The Adviser, subject to the prior written consent of theCo-Adviser, is hereby authorized to enter into one or moresub-advisory agreements (each, a “Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with other investment advisers or other service providers (each, a “Sub-Adviser”) pursuant to which the Adviser may obtain the services of theSub-Adviser(s) to assist the Adviser in fulfilling its responsibilities hereunder, subject to the oversight of the Adviser and the Corporation. Specifically, the Adviser may retain aSub-Adviser to recommend specific securities or other investments based upon the Corporation’s investment objectives, policies and restrictions, and work, along with the Adviser, in sourcing, structuring, negotiating, arranging or effecting the acquisition or disposition of such investments and monitoring investments on behalf of the Corporation, subject to the oversight of the Adviser and the Corporation, with the scope of such services and oversight to be set forth in eachSub-Advisory Agreement.

(i)    The Adviser and/orCo-Adviser, and not the Corporation, shall be responsible for any compensation payable to anySub-Adviser; provided, however, that the Adviser shall have the right to direct

2


the Corporation to pay directly anySub-Adviser the amounts due and payable to suchSub-Adviser from the fees and expenses otherwise payable to the Adviser under this Agreement.

(ii)    AnySub-Advisory Agreement entered into by the Adviser shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Investment Company Act, including without limitation the requirements relating to the Board and the Corporation’s stockholder approval thereunder, and other applicable federal and state law.

(iii)    AnySub-Adviser shall be subject to the same fiduciary duties imposed on the Adviser pursuant to this Agreement, the Investment Company Act and the Advisers Act, as well as other applicable federal and state law.

(g)    Independent Contractor Status. The Adviser shall, for all purposes herein provided, be deemed to be an independent contractor and, except as expressly provided or authorized herein, shall have no authority to act for or represent the Corporation in any way or otherwise be deemed an agent of the Corporation.

(h)    Record Retention. Subject to review by, and the overall control of, the Board, the Adviser shall keep and preserve for the period required by the Investment Company Act or the Advisers Act, as applicable, any books and records relevant to the provision of its investment advisory services to the Corporation and shall specifically maintain all books and records with respect to the Corporation’s portfolio transactions and shall render to the Board such periodic and special reports as the Board may reasonably request or as may be required under applicable federal and state law, and shall make such records available for inspection by the Board and its authorized agents, at any time and from time to time during normal business hours. The Adviser agrees that all records that it maintains for the Corporation are the property of the Corporation and shall surrender promptly to the Corporation any such records upon the Corporation’s request and upon termination of this Agreement pursuant toSection 9, provided that the Adviser may retain a copy of such records. The Adviser shall have the right to retain copies, or originals where required by Rule204-2 promulgated under the Advisers Act, of such records to the extent required by applicable law.

The following provisions in thisSection 1 shall apply for only so long as the shares of common stock of the Corporation (“Common Stock”) are not listed on a national securities exchange.

(i)    Administrator. The Adviser shall, upon request by an official or agency administering the securities laws of a state, province or commonwealth (an “Administrator”), submit to such Administrator the reports and statements required to be distributed to the Corporation’s stockholders pursuant to this Agreement, the Corporation’s then effective Registration Statement on FormN-2 (as amended from time to time, the “Registration Statement”) and applicable federal and state law.

(j)    Fiduciary Duty. It is acknowledged that the Adviser shall have a fiduciary responsibility for the safekeeping and use of all funds and assets of the Corporation, whether or not in the Adviser’s immediate possession or control. The Adviser shall not employ, or permit another to employ, such funds or assets in any manner except for the exclusive benefit of the Corporation. The Adviser shall not, by entry into an agreement with any stockholder of the Corporation or otherwise, contract away the fiduciary obligation owed to the Corporation and the Corporation’s stockholders under common law.

2.The Corporations Responsibilities and Expenses Payable by the Corporation and the Adviser.

(a)    Adviser Personnel. All personnel of the Adviser, when and to the extent engaged in providing investment advisory services herein, and the compensation and routine overhead expenses of such personnel allocable to such services, shall be provided and paid for by the Adviser or its affiliates and not by the Corporation.

(b)    Costs. Subject to the limitations on reimbursement of the Adviser as set forth inSection 2(c) below, the Corporation, either directly or through reimbursement to the Adviser, shall bear all other costs and expenses

3


of its operations and transactions, including (without limitation): expenses deemed to be “organization and offering expenses” of the Corporation for purposes of Conduct Rule 2310(a)(12) of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (for purposes of this Agreement, such expenses, exclusive of commissions, the dealer manager fee, any discounts and other similar expenses paid by investors at the time of sale of the stock of the Corporation, are hereinafter referred to as “Organization and Offering Costs”); corporate and organizational expenses relating to offerings of shares of Common Stock, subject to limitations included in this Agreement; the cost of calculating the Corporation’s net asset value for each share class, as applicable, including the cost of any third-party pricing or valuation services; the cost of effecting sales and repurchases of shares of Common Stock and other securities; investment advisory fees; fees payable to third parties including, without limitation, agents, consultants or other advisors, relating to, or associated with, making investments, monitoring investments and valuing investments, including fees and expenses associated with performing due diligence reviews of prospective investments; interest payments on the Corporation’s debt or related obligations; transfer agent and custodial fees; research and market data (including news and quotation equipment and services, and any computer hardware and connectivity hardware (e.g., telephone and fiber optic lines) incorporated into the cost of obtaining such research and market data); fees and expenses associated with marketing efforts; federal and state registration or notification fees; federal, state and local taxes; fees and expenses of directors not also serving in an executive officer capacity for the Corporation or the Adviser; costs of proxy statements, stockholders’ reports, notices and other filings; fidelity bond, directors and officers errors and omissions liability insurance and other insurance premiums; direct costs such as printing, mailing, long distance telephone and staff costs; fees and expenses associated with accounting, corporate governance, independent audits and outside legal costs; costs associated with the Corporation’s reporting and compliance obligations under the Investment Company Act and applicable federal and state securities laws, including compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended; all costs of registration and listing the Corporation’s Common Stock or other securities on any securities exchange; brokerage commissions for the Corporation’s investments; all other expenses incurred by the Adviser, anySub-Adviser or the Corporation in connection with administering the Corporation’s business, including expenses incurred by the Adviser or anySub-Adviser in performing administrative services for the Corporation and administrative personnel paid by the Adviser or anySub-Adviser, to the extent they are not controlling persons of the Adviser, anySub-Adviser or any of their respective affiliates; and any expenses incurred outside of the ordinary course of business, including, without limitation, costs incurred in connection with any claim, litigation, arbitration, mediation, government investigation or similar proceeding and indemnification expenses as provided for in the Articles or the Bylaws.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Corporation shall not be liable for Organization and Offering Costs to the extent that Organization and Offering Costs, together with all prior Organization and Offering Costs, exceed 1.5% of the aggregate gross proceeds from the offering of the Corporation’s securities.

4


The following provisions in thisSection 2(c) shall apply for only so long as shares of Common Stock are not listed on a national securities exchange.

(c)    Limitations on Reimbursement of Expenses.

(i)    In addition to the compensation paid to the Adviser pursuant toSection 3, the Corporation shall reimburse the Adviser for all expenses of the Corporation incurred by the Adviser as well as the actual cost of goods and services used for or by the Corporation and obtained from entities not affiliated with the Adviser. The Adviser may be reimbursed for the administrative services performed by it on behalf of the Corporation; provided, however, the reimbursement shall be an amount equal to the lower of the Adviser’s actual cost or the amount the Corporation would be required to pay third parties for the provision of comparable administrative services in the same geographic location; and provided, further, that such costs are reasonably allocated to the Corporation on the basis of assets, revenues, time allocations and/or other reasonable metrics consistent with past practice. No reimbursement shall be permitted for services for which the Adviser is entitled to compensation by way of a separate fee. Excluded from the allowable reimbursement shall be:

(A)    rent or depreciation, utilities, capital equipment, and other administrative items of the Adviser; and

(B)    salaries, fringe benefits, travel expenses and other administrative items incurred by or allocated to any controlling person (as defined in the Investment Company Act) of the Adviser (or any individual performing such services) or a holder of 10% or greater equity interest in the Adviser (or any person having the power to direct or cause the direction of the Adviser, whether by ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise).

(d)    Periodic Reimbursement. Expenses incurred by the Adviser on behalf of the Corporation and payable pursuant to thisSection 2 shall be reimbursed no less than monthly to the Adviser. The Adviser shall prepare a statement documenting the expenses of the Corporation and the calculation of the reimbursement and shall deliver such statement to the Corporation prior to full reimbursement.

3.Compensation of the Adviser.

The Corporation agrees to pay, and the Adviser agrees to accept, as compensation for the services provided by the Adviser herein, a base management fee (the “Base Management Fee”) and an incentive fee (the “Incentive Fee”) as hereinafter set forth. Any of the fees payable to the Adviser under this Agreement for any partial month or calendar quarter shall be appropriately prorated. The Adviser may agree to temporarily or permanently waive, in whole or in part, the Base Management Fee and/or the Incentive Fee. See Appendix A for examples of how these fees are calculated. Prior to the payment of any fee to the Adviser, the Corporation shall obtain written instructions from the Adviser with respect to any waiver or deferral of any portion of such fees. Any portion of a deferred fee payable to the Adviser and not paid over to the Adviser with respect to any month, calendar quarter or year shall be deferred without interest and may be paid over in any such other month prior to the termination of this Agreement, as the Adviser may determine upon written notice to the Corporation. The base management fee and incentive fee under the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement are equal to the Base Management Fee and Incentive Fee payable to the Adviser hereunder.

(a)    Base Management Fee. The Base Management Fee shall be calculated at an annual rate of 0.75% of the Corporation’s average weekly gross assets. The Base Management Fee shall be payable quarterly in arrears, and shall be calculated based on the average weekly value of the Corporation’s gross assets during the most recently completed calendar quarter. All or any part of the Base Management Fee not taken as to any quarter shall be deferred without interest and may be taken in such other quarter as the Adviser shall determine.

(b)    Incentive Fee. The Incentive Fee shall consist of two parts, as follows:

(i)    The first part of the Incentive Fee, referred to as the “Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income,” shall be calculated and payable quarterly in arrears based on the Corporation’s “Pre-Incentive Fee Net

5


Investment Income” for the immediately preceding quarter. The payment of the Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income shall be subject to a quarterly hurdle rate, expressed as a rate of return on Adjusted Capital (as defined below) at the beginning of the most recently completed calendar quarter, of 1.75% (7.0% annualized) (the “Hurdle Rate”), subject to a “catch up” feature (as described below).

For this purpose, “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income” means interest income, dividend income and any other income (including any other fees, other than fees for providing managerial assistance, such as commitment, origination, structuring, diligence and consulting fees or other fees that the Corporation receives from portfolio companies) accrued during the calendar quarter, minus the Corporation’s operating expenses for the quarter (including the Base Management Fee under this Agreement and the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement, expenses reimbursed to the Adviser under this Agreement and to theCo-Adviser under the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued and outstanding preferred shares, but excluding the Incentive Fee under this Agreement and the InvestmentCo-Advisory Agreement).Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income includes, in the case of investments with a deferred interest feature (such as original issue discount debt instruments withpayment-in-kind interest and zero coupon securities), accrued income that the Corporation has not yet received in cash.Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not include any realized capital gains, realized capital losses or unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation.

For purposes of this fee, “Adjusted Capital” shall mean cumulative gross proceeds generated from sales of the Corporation’s Common Stock (including proceeds from the Corporation’s distribution reinvestment plan) reduced for distributions fromnon-liquidating dispositions of the Corporation’s investments paid to stockholders and amounts paid for share repurchases pursuant to the Corporation’s share repurchase program.

The calculation of the Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income for each quarter is as follows:

(A)    No Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income shall be payable to the Adviser in any calendar quarter in which the Corporation’sPre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not exceed the Hurdle Rate;

(B)    50% of the Corporation’sPre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, if any, that exceeds the Hurdle Rate but is less than or equal to 2.1875% in any calendar quarter (8.75% annualized) shall be payable to the Adviser. This portion of the Corporation’s Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income is referred to as the “catch up” and is intended to provide the Adviser with an incentive fee of 10.0% on all of the Corporation’sPre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income when the Corporation’sPre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income reaches 2.1875% (8.75% annualized) in any calendar quarter; and

(C)    For any quarter in which the Corporation’sPre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income exceeds 2.1875% (8.75% annualized), the Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income shall equal 10.0% of the amount of the Corporation’sPre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, as the Hurdle Rate andcatch-up will have been achieved;

(ii)    The second part of the Incentive Fee, referred to as the “Incentive Fee on Capital Gains,” shall be an incentive fee on capital gains earned on liquidated investments from the portfolio and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of this Agreement). This fee shall equal 10.0% of the Corporation’s incentive fee capital gains, which shall equal the Corporation’s realized capital gains on a cumulative basis from inception, calculated as of the end of the applicable period, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less 50% of the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive fees.

4.Covenants of the Adviser.

(a)    Adviser Status. The Adviser is registered as an investment adviser under the Advisers Act and covenants that it will maintain such registration. The Adviser agrees that its activities will at all times be in

6


compliance in all material respects with all applicable federal and state laws governing its operations and investments.

The following provisions in thisSection 4 shall apply for only so long as the Common Stock of the Corporation are not listed on a national securities exchange.

(b)    Reports to Stockholders. The Adviser shall prepare or shall cause to be prepared and distributed to stockholders during each year the following reports of the Corporation (either included in a periodic report filed with the SEC or distributed in a separate report):

(i)    Quarterly Reports. Within sixty (60) days of the end of each calendar quarter, a report containing the same financial information contained in the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q filed by the Corporation under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

(ii)    Annual Report. Within one hundred and twenty (120) days after the end of the Corporation’s fiscal year, an annual report containing:

(A)    A balance sheet as of the end of each fiscal year and statements of income, equity, and cash flow, for the year then ended, all of which shall be prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and accompanied by an auditor’s report containing an opinion of an independent certified public accountant;

(B)    A report of the activities of the Corporation during the period covered by the report;

(C)    Where forecasts have been provided to the Corporation’s stockholders, a table comparing the forecasts previously provided with the actual results during the period covered by the report; and

(D)    A report setting forth distributions by the Corporation for the period covered thereby and separately identifying distributions from (i) cash flow from operations during the period; (ii) cash flow from operations during a prior period which have been held as reserves; and (iii) proceeds from disposition of the Corporation’s assets.

(iii)    Previous Reimbursement Reports. The Adviser shall prepare or shall cause to be prepared a report, prepared in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants United States Auditing Standards relating to special reports, and distributed to stockholders not less than annually, containing an itemized list of the costs reimbursed to the Adviser pursuant toSection 2(c) for the previous fiscal year. The special report shall at a minimum provide:

(A)    A review of the time allocations of individual employees, the costs of whose services were reimbursed; and

(B)    A review of the specific nature of the work performed by each such employee.

(iv)    Proposed Reimbursement Reports. The Adviser shall prepare or shall cause to be prepared a report containing an itemized estimate of all proposed expenses for which it shall receive reimbursements pursuant toSection 2(c) of this Agreement for the next fiscal year, together with a breakdown by year of such expenses reimbursed in each of the last five public programs formed by the Adviser.

(c)    Reports to Administrators. The Adviser shall, upon written request of any Administrator, submit any of the reports and statements to be prepared and distributed by it pursuant to thisSection 4 to such Administrator.

(d)    Reserves. In performing its duties hereunder, the Adviser shall cause the Corporation to provide for adequate reserves for normal replacements and contingencies (but not for payment of fees payable to the Adviser hereunder) by causing the Corporation to retain a reasonable percentage of proceeds from offerings and revenues.

(e)    Recommendations Regarding Reviews. From time to time and not less than quarterly, the Adviser must review the Corporation’s accounts to determine whether cash distributions are appropriate. The Corporation may, subject to authorization by the Board, distribute pro rata to the stockholders funds received by the Corporation which the Adviser deems unnecessary to retain in the Corporation.

7


(f)    Temporary Investments. The Adviser shall, in its sole discretion, temporarily place proceeds from offerings by the Corporation into short term, highly liquid investments which, in its reasonable judgment, afford appropriate safety of principal during such time as it is determining the composition and allocation of the portfolio of the Corporation and the nature, timing and implementation of any changes thereto pursuant toSection 1(b); provided however, that the Adviser shall be under no fiduciary obligation to select any such short-term, highly liquid investment based solely on any yield or return of such investment. The Adviser shall cause any proceeds of the offering of the Corporation’s securities not committed for investment within the later of two (2) years from the initial date of effectiveness of the Registration Statement or one year from termination of the offering, unless a longer period is permitted by the applicable Administrator, to be paid as a distribution to the stockholders of the Corporation as a return of capital without deduction of Front End Fees (as defined below).

5.Brokerage Commissions, Limitations on Front End Fees.

(a)    Brokerage Commissions. The Adviser, in coordination with theCo-Adviser, is hereby authorized, to the fullest extent now or hereafter permitted by law, to cause the Corporation to pay a member of a national securities exchange, broker or dealer an amount of commission for effecting a securities transaction in excess of the amount of commission another member of such exchange, broker or dealer would have charged for effecting that transaction, if the Adviser, in coordination with theCo-Adviser, determines in good faith, taking into account such factors as price (including the applicable brokerage commission or dealer spread), size of order, difficulty of execution, and operational facilities of the firm and the firm’s risk and skill in positioning blocks of securities, that such amount of commission is reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage and/or research services provided by such member, broker or dealer, viewed in terms of either that particular transaction or its overall responsibilities with respect to the Corporation’s portfolio, and is consistent with the Adviser’s andCo-Adviser’s duty to seek the best execution on behalf of the Corporation.

The following provisions in thisSection 5 shall apply for only so long as the Common Stock of the Corporation are not listed on a national securities exchange.

(b)    Limitations. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary:

(i)    All fees and expenses paid by any party for any services rendered to organize the Corporation and to acquire assets for the Corporation (“Front End Fees”) shall be reasonable and shall not exceed 15% of the gross offering proceeds, regardless of the source of payment. Any reimbursement to the Adviser or any other person for deferred organizational and offering costs, including any interest thereon, if any, will be included within this 15% limitation.

(ii)    The Adviser shall commit at leasteighty-two percent (82%) of the gross offering proceeds towards the investment or reinvestment of assets and reserves as set forth inSection 4(d) above on behalf of the Corporation. The remaining proceeds may be used to pay Front End Fees.

6.Other Activities of the Adviser.

The services provided by the Adviser to the Corporation are not exclusive, and the Adviser may engage in any other business or render similar or different services to others including, without limitation, the direct or indirect sponsorship or management of other investment based accounts or commingled pools of capital, however structured, having investment objectives similar to those of the Corporation, so long as its services to the Corporation hereunder are not impaired thereby, and nothing in this Agreement shall limit or restrict the right of any manager, partner, member (including its members and the owners of its members), officer or employee of the Adviser to engage in any other business or to devote his or her time and attention in part to any other business, whether of a similar or dissimilar nature, or to receive any fees or compensation in connection therewith (including fees for serving as a director of, or providing consulting services to, one or more of the Corporation’s portfolio companies, subject to applicable law). The Adviser assumes no responsibility under this

8


Agreement other than to render the services called for hereunder. It is understood that directors, officers, employees and stockholders of the Corporation are or may become interested in the Adviser and its affiliates, as directors, officers, employees, partners, stockholders, members, managers or otherwise, and that the Adviser and directors, officers, employees, partners, stockholders, members and managers of the Adviser and its affiliates are or may become similarly interested in the Corporation as stockholders or otherwise.

7.Responsibility of Dual Directors, Officers and/or Employees.

If any person who is a manager, partner, member, officer or employee of the Adviser is or becomes a director, officer and/or employee of the Corporation and acts as such in any business of the Corporation, then such manager, partner, member, officer and/or employee of the Adviser shall be deemed to be acting in such capacity solely for the Corporation, and not as a manager, partner, member, officer or employee of the Adviser or under the control or direction of the Adviser, even if paid by the Adviser.

8.Indemnification; Limitation of Liability.

(a)    Indemnification. The Adviser and anySub-Adviser (and their officers, managers, partners, members (and their members, including the owners of their members), agents, employees, controlling persons (as defined in the Investment Company Act) and any other person or entity affiliated with, or acting on behalf of, the Adviser orSub-Adviser) (each, an “Indemnified Party and, collectively, the “Indemnified Parties”), shall not be liable to the Corporation for any action taken or omitted to be taken by any such Indemnified Party in connection with the performance of any of its duties or obligations under this Agreement or otherwise as an investment adviser of the Corporation (except to the extent specified in Section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act concerning loss resulting from a breach of fiduciary duty (as the same is finally determined by judicial proceedings) with respect to the receipt of compensation for services), and the Corporation shall indemnify, defend and protect the Indemnified Parties (each of whom shall be deemed a third party beneficiary hereof) and hold them harmless from and against all damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) (“Losses”) incurred by the Indemnified Parties in or by reason of any pending, threatened or completed action, suit, investigation or other proceeding (including an action or suit by or in the right of the Corporation or its security holders) arising out of or otherwise based upon the performance of any of the Indemnified Parties’ duties or obligations under this Agreement, anySub-Advisory Agreement or otherwise as an investment adviser of the Corporation, to the extent such Losses are not fully reimbursed by insurance, and to the extent that such indemnification would not be inconsistent with the laws of the State of Maryland, the Investment Company Act or other applicable law, the Articles or the provisions of Section II.G of the Omnibus Guidelines published by the North American Securities Administrators Association on March 29, 1992, as it may be amended from time to time. In addition, notwithstanding any of the foregoing to the contrary, the provisions of thisSection 8 shall not be construed so as to provide for the indemnification of any Indemnified Party for any liability (including liability under federal securities laws which, under certain circumstances, impose liability even on persons that act in good faith), to the extent (but only to the extent) that such indemnification would be in violation of applicable law, but shall be construed so as to effectuate the provisions of thisSection 8 to the fullest extent permitted by law.

The following provisions in thisSection 8 shall apply for only so long as the Common Stock of the Corporation are not listed on a national securities exchange.

(b)    Limitations on Indemnification. NotwithstandingSection 8(a) to the contrary, the Corporation shall not provide for indemnification of the Indemnified Parties for any Loss suffered by the Indemnified Parties, nor shall the Corporation provide that any of the Indemnified Parties be held harmless for any Loss suffered by the Corporation, unless all of the following conditions are met:

(i)    the Indemnified Party has determined, in good faith, that the course of conduct which caused the Loss was in the best interests of the Corporation;

9


(ii)    the Indemnified Party was acting on behalf of or performing services for the Corporation;

(iii)    such Loss was not the result of negligence or misconduct by the Indemnified Party; and

(iv)    such indemnification or agreement to hold harmless is recoverable only out of the Corporation’s net assets and not from stockholders.

Furthermore, the Indemnified Party shall not be indemnified for any Losses arising from or out of an alleged violation of federal or state securities laws unless one or more of the following conditions are met:

(i)    there has been a successful adjudication on the merits of each count involving alleged securities law violations;

(ii)    such claims have been dismissed with prejudice on the merits by a court of competent jurisdiction; or

(iii)    a court of competent jurisdiction approves a settlement of the claims against a particular indemnitee and finds that indemnification of the settlement and related costs should be made, and the court of law considering the request for indemnification has been advised of the position of the SEC and the published position of any state securities regulatory authority in which securities of the Corporation were offered or sold as to indemnification for violations of securities laws.

(c)    Advancement of Funds. The Corporation shall be permitted to advance funds to the Indemnified Party for legal expenses and other costs incurred as a result of any legal action for which indemnification is being sought and will do so if:

(i)    the proceeding relates to acts or omissions with respect to the performance of duties or services on behalf of the Corporation;

(ii)    the Indemnified Party provides the Corporation with written affirmation of his or her good faith belief that the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification by the Corporation has been met;

(iii)    the legal proceeding was initiated by a third party who is not a stockholder or, if by a stockholder of the Corporation acting in his or her capacity as such, a court of competent jurisdiction approves such advancement; and

(iv)    the Indemnified Party provides the Corporation with a written agreement to repay the amount paid or reimbursed by the Corporation, together with the applicable legal rate of interest thereon, in cases in which such Indemnified Party is found not to be entitled to indemnification.

9.Duration and Termination of Agreement.

(a)    Term. This Agreement shall remain in effect for two (2) years commencing on the date hereof, and thereafter shall continue automatically for successive annual periods, provided that such continuance is specifically approved at least annually by (i) the vote of the Board, or by the vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Corporation and (ii) the vote of a majority of the Corporation’s directors who are not parties to this Agreement or “interested persons” (as such term is defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act) of any such party (“Independent Directors”), in accordance with the requirements of the Investment Company Act.

(b)    Termination. This Agreement may be terminated at any time, without the payment of any penalty, upon sixty (60) days’ written notice (i) by the Corporation to the Adviser, (x) upon the vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Corporation (within the meaning of Section 2(a)(42) of the Investment Company Act), or (y) by the vote of the Corporation’s Independent Directors, or (ii) by the Adviser to the Corporation. This Agreement shall automatically terminate in the event of (x) its “assignment” (as such term is defined for purposes of Section 15(a)(4) of the Investment Company Act), or (y) the effectiveness of an

10


Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement by and between the Corporation and FS/KKR Advisor, LLC. The provisions ofSection 8 of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, and the Adviser shall remain entitled to the benefits thereof, notwithstanding any termination of this Agreement.

(c)    Payments to and Duties of Adviser Upon Termination.

(i)    After the termination of this Agreement, the Adviser shall not be entitled to compensation or reimbursement for further services provided hereunder, except that it shall be entitled to receive from the Corporation within thirty (30) days after the effective date of such termination all unpaid reimbursements and all earned but unpaid fees payable to the Adviser prior to termination of this Agreement.

(ii)    The Adviser shall promptly upon termination:

(A)    Deliver to the Board a full accounting, including a statement showing all payments collected by it and a statement of all money held by it, covering the period following the date of the last accounting furnished to the Board;

(B)    Deliver to the Board all assets and documents of the Corporation then in custody of the Adviser; and

(C)    Cooperate with the Corporation to provide an orderly management transition.

The following provisions in thisSection 9 shall apply for only so long as the Common Stock of the Corporation are not listed on a national securities exchange.

(d)    Other Matters. Without the approval of holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock entitled to vote on the matter, the Adviser shall not: (i) amend this Agreement except for amendments that do not adversely affect the interests of the stockholders; (ii) voluntarily withdraw as the Adviser unless such withdrawal would not affect the tax status of the Corporation and would not materially adversely affect the stockholders; (iii) appoint a new Adviser; (iv) sell all or substantially all of the Corporation’s assets other than in the ordinary course of the Corporation’s business; or (v) cause the merger or other reorganization of the Corporation. In the event that the Adviser should withdraw pursuant to (ii) above, the withdrawing Adviser shall pay all expenses incurred as a result of its withdrawal. The Corporation may terminate the Adviser’s interest in the Corporation’s revenues, expenses, income, losses, distributions and capital by payment of an amount equal to the then present fair market value of the terminated Adviser’s interest, determined by agreement of the terminated Adviser and the Corporation. If the Corporation and the Adviser cannot agree upon such amount, then such amount will be determined in accordance with the then current rules of the American Arbitration Association. The expenses of such arbitration shall be borne equally by the terminated Adviser and the Corporation. The method of payment to the terminated Adviser must be fair and must protect the solvency and liquidity of the Corporation.

10.Conflicts of Interests and Prohibited Activities.

The following provisions in thisSection 10 shall apply for only so long as the Common Stock of the Corporation are not listed on a national securities exchange.

(a)    No Exclusive Agreement. The Adviser is not hereby granted or entitled to an exclusive right to sell or exclusive employment to sell assets for the Corporation.

(b)    Rebates, Kickbacks and Reciprocal Arrangements.

The Adviser agrees that it shall not (A) receive or accept any rebate,give-up or similar arrangement that is prohibited under applicable federal or state securities laws, (B) participate in any reciprocal business arrangement that would circumvent provisions of applicable federal or state securities laws governing conflicts of interest or investment restrictions, or (C) enter into any agreement, arrangement or understanding that would circumvent the restrictions against dealing with affiliates or promoters under applicable federal or state securities laws.

11


The Adviser agrees that it shall not directly or indirectly pay or award any fees or commissions or other compensation to any person or entity engaged to sell the Corporation’s Common Stock or give investment advice to a potential stockholder; provided, however, that this subsection shall not prohibit the payment to a registered broker-dealer or other properly licensed agent of sales commissions for selling or distributing the Corporation’s Common Stock.

(c)    Commingling. The Adviser covenants that it shall not permit or cause to be permitted the Corporation’s funds to be commingled with the funds of any other entity. Nothing in thisSection 10(c) shall prohibit the Adviser from establishing a master fiduciary account pursuant to which separatesub-trust accounts are established for the benefit of affiliated programs, provided that the Corporation’s funds are protected from the claims of other programs and creditors of such programs.

11.Proxy Voting.

The Adviser, in coordination with theCo-Adviser, will exercise voting rights on any assets held in the portfolio securities of portfolio companies. The Adviser is obligated to furnish to the Corporation, in a timely manner, a record of all proxies voted in such form and format that complies with applicable federal statutes and regulations.

12.Notices.

Any notice under this Agreement shall be given in writing, addressed and delivered or mailed, postage prepaid, to the other party at its principal office.

13.Amendments.

This Agreement may be amended in writing by mutual consent of the parties hereto, subject to the provisions of the Investment Company Act and the Articles.

14.Entire Agreement; Governing Law.

This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes all prior agreements, understandings and arrangements with respect to the subject matter hereof. Notwithstanding the place where this Agreement may be executed by any of the parties hereto, this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. For so long as the Corporation is regulated as a BDC under the Investment Company Act, this Agreement shall also be construed in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Investment Company Act. In such case, to the extent the applicable laws of the State of New York, or any of the provisions herein, conflict with the provisions of the Investment Company Act, the latter shall control.

15.Severability.

If any provision of this Agreement shall be declared illegal, invalid or unenforceable in any jurisdiction, then such provision shall be deemed to be severable from this Agreement (to the extent permitted by law) and in any event such illegality, invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the remainder hereof.

16.Counterparts.

This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original copy and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument binding on all parties hereto, notwithstanding that all parties shall not have signed the same counterpart.

12


17.Third Party Beneficiaries.

Except for anySub-Adviser (with respect toSection 8) and any Indemnified Party, suchSub-Adviser and the Indemnified Parties each being an intended beneficiary of this Agreement, this Agreement is for the sole benefit of the parties hereto and their permitted assigns and nothing herein express or implied shall give or be construed to give to any person, other than the parties hereto and such assigns, any legal or equitable rights hereunder.

18.Survival.

The provisions ofSections 8,9(b),9(c),14,17 and thisSection 18 shall survive termination of this Agreement.

19.Insurance.

Subject to the requirements of Rule17d-1(d)(7) under the Investment Company Act, the Corporation shall acquire and maintain a directors and officers liability insurance policy or similar insurance policy, which may name the Adviser,Co-Adviser and anySub-Adviser each as an additional insured party (each an “Additional Insured Party” and collectively the “Additional Insured Parties”). Such insurance policy shall include reasonable coverage from a reputable insurer. The Corporation shall make all premium payments required to maintain such policy in full force and effect;provided,however, each Additional Insured Party, if any, shall pay to the Corporation, in advance of the due date of such premium, its allocated share of the premium. Irrespective of whether the Adviser,Co-Adviser and anySub-Adviser is a named Additional Insured Party on such policy, the Corporation shall provide the Adviser,Co-Adviser and anySub-Adviser with written notice upon receipt of any notice of: (a) any default under such policy; (b) any pending or threatened termination, cancellation ornon-renewal of such policy or (c) any coverage limitation or reduction with respect to such policy. The foregoing provisions of thisSection 19 notwithstanding, the Corporation shall not be required to acquire or maintain any insurance policy to the extent that the same is not available upon commercially reasonable pricing terms or at all, as determined in good faith by the required majority (as defined in Section 57(o) of the Investment Company Act) of the Board.

20.Brand Usage.

The Adviser conducts its investment advisory business under, and owns all rights to, the trademark “KKR” and the “KKR” design (collectively, the “Brand”). In connection with the Corporation’s (a) public filings; (b) requests for information from state and federal regulators; (c) offering materials and advertising materials; and (d) investor communications, the Corporation may state in such materials that investment advisory services are being provided by the Adviser to the Corporation under the terms of this Agreement. The Adviser hereby grants anon-exclusive,non-transferable,non-sublicensable and royalty-free license (the “License”) to the Corporation for the use of the Brand solely as permitted in the foregoing sentence. Prior to using the Brand in any manner, the Corporation shall submit all proposed uses to the Adviser for prior written approval solely to the extent the Corporation’s use of the Brand or any combination or derivation thereof has materially changed from the Corporation’s use of the Brand previously approved by the Adviser. The Adviser reserves the right to terminate the License immediately upon written notice for any reason, including if the usage is not in compliance with its standards and policies. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the term of the License granted under thisSection 20 shall be for the term of this Agreement only, including renewals and extensions, and the right to use the Brand as provided herein shall terminate immediately upon the termination of this Agreement. The Corporation agrees that the Adviser is the sole owner of the Brand, and any and all goodwill in the Brand arising from the Corporation’s use shall inure solely to the benefit of the Adviser. Without limiting the foregoing, the License shall have no effect on the Corporation’s ownership rights of the works within which the Brand shall be used.

[Remainder of page left intentionally blank]

13


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed on the date above written.

FS INVESTMENT CORPORATION II
By:

Name:
Title:
KKR CREDIT ADVISORS (US) LLC
By:

Name:
Title:

[Signature Page to Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement]


Appendix A

NOTE: All percentages herein refer to Adjusted Capital.

Example 1: Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income for Each Calendar Quarter*

Scenario 1

Assumptions

Investment income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) = 1.25%

Hurdle Rate(1) = 1.75%

Base Management Fee(2) = 0.375%

Other expenses (legal, accounting, custodian, transfer agent, etc.)(3) = 0.2%

Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income

(investment income — (Base Management Fee + other expenses)) = 0.675%

Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not exceed the Hurdle Rate, therefore there is no Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income payable.

Scenario 2

Assumptions

Investment income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) = 2.675%

Hurdle Rate(1) = 1.75%

Base Management Fee(2) = 0.375%

Other expenses (legal, accounting, custodian, transfer agent, etc.)(3) = 0.2%

Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income

(investment income — (Base Management Fee + other expenses)) = 2.1%

Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income = 50% x Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income (subject to “catch-up”)(4)

= 50% x (2.1% — 1.75%)

= 0.175%

Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income exceeds the Hurdle Rate, but does not fully satisfy the “catch-up” provision, therefore the Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income is 0.175%.

Scenario 3

Assumptions

Investment income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) = 3.5%

Hurdle Rate(1) = 1.75%

Base Management Fee(2) = 0.375%

Other expenses (legal, accounting, custodian, transfer agent, etc.)(3) = 0.2%

Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income

(investment income — (Base Management Fee + other expenses)) = 2.925%

Catch up = 50% x Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income (subject to “catch-up”)(4)

Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income = 50% x “catch-up” + (10.0% x (Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income — 2.1875%))

A-1


Catch up          = 2.1875% — 1.75%

     = 0.4375%

Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income = (50% x 0.4375%) + (10.0% x (2.925% — 2.1875%))

     = 0.21875% + (10.0% x 0.7375%)

     = 0.21875% + 0.07375%

     = 0.2925%

Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income exceeds the Hurdle Rate and fully satisfies the “catch-up” provision, therefore the Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income is 0.2925%.

(1)Represents 7.0% annualized Hurdle Rate.
(2)Represents 1.5% annualized Base Management Fee on average weekly gross assets under this Agreement and the Investment Co-Advisory Agreement. Examples assume assets are equal to Adjusted Capital.
(3)Excludes organizational and offering costs.
(4)The “catch-up” provision is intended to provide the Adviser with an Incentive Fee of 10.0% on all Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income when the Corporation’s net investment income exceeds 2.1875% in any calendar quarter.

Example 2: Incentive Fee on Capital Gains*

Scenario 1:

Assumptions

Year 1: $20 million investment made in Company A (“Investment A”), and $30 million investment made in Company B (“Investment B”)

Year 2: Investment A sold for $50 million and fair market value (“FMV”) of Investment B determined to be $32 million

Year 3: FMV of Investment B determined to be $25 million

Year 4: Investment B sold for $31 million

The Incentive Fee on Capital Gains would be:

Year 1: None

Year 2: Incentive Fee on Capital Gains of $3 million ($30 million realized capital gains on sale of Investment A multiplied by 10.0%)

Year 3: None, because $2.5 million (10.0% multiplied by ($30 million cumulative capital gains less $5 million cumulative capital depreciation)) less $3 million (previous capital gain incentive fee paid to the Adviser in Year 2 (and 50% of aggregate capital gain incentive fee paid by the Corporation in Year 2)) is less than $0

Year 4: Incentive Fee on Capital Gains of $100,000, because $3.1 million ($31 million cumulative realized capital gains multiplied by 10.0%) less $3 million (previous capital gain incentive fee paid to the Adviser in Year 2 (and 50% of aggregate capital gain incentive fee paid by the Corporation in Year 2)) is $100,000

A-2


Scenario 2

Assumptions

Year 1: $20 million investment made in Company A (“Investment A”), $30 million investment made in Company B (“Investment B”) and $25 million investment made in Company C (“Investment C”)

Year 2: Investment A sold for $50 million, FMV of Investment B determined to be $25 million and FMV of Investment C determined to be $25 million

Year 3: FMV of Investment B determined to be $27 million and Investment C sold for $30 million

Year 4: FMV of Investment B determined to be $35 million

Year 5: Investment B sold for $20 million

The Incentive Fee on Capital Gains, if any, would be:

Year 1: None

Year 2: $2.5 million Incentive Fee on Capital Gains, because 10.0% multiplied by $25 million ($30 million realized capital gains on Investment A less unrealized capital depreciation on Investment B) is $2.5 million

Year 3: $0.7 million Incentive Fee on Capital Gains, because $3.2 million (10.0% multiplied by $32 million ($35 million cumulative realized capital gains less $3 million unrealized capital depreciation)) less $2.5 million capital gain incentive fee paid to the Adviser in Year 2 (and 50% of aggregate capital gain incentive fee paid by the Corporation in Year 2) is $0.7 million

Year 4: None

Year 5: None, because $2.5 million (10.0% multiplied by $25 million (cumulative realized capital gains of $35 million less realized capital losses of $10 million)) less $3.2 million cumulative capital gain incentive fee paid to the Adviser in Year 2 and Year 3 (and 50% of aggregate capital gain incentive fee paid by the Corporation in Year 2 and Year 3) is less than $0

*The returns shown are for illustrative purposes only. No Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income is payable to the Adviser in any calendar quarter in which the Corporation’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not exceed the Hurdle Rate. Positive returns are shown to demonstrate the fee structure and there is no guarantee that positive returns will be realized. Actual returns may vary from those shown in the examples above.

A-3


EXHIBIT C

INVESTMENT ADVISORY AND

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

FS INVESTMENT CORPORATION II

AND

FS/KKR ADVISOR, LLC

This Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement (this “Agreement”) is made this [●] day of [●], 2018, by and between FS INVESTMENT CORPORATION II, a Maryland corporation (the “Corporation”), and FS/KKR ADVISOR, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Adviser”).

WHEREAS, the Corporation is anon-diversified,closed-end management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”); and

WHEREAS, the Adviser is a newly organized investment adviser that intends to register as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”); and

WHEREAS, the Corporation desires to retain the Adviser to furnish investment advisory services to the Corporation and to provide for the administrative services necessary for the operation of the Corporation on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, and the Adviser wishes to be retained to provide such services.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereby agree as follows:

1.Duties of the Adviser.

(a)    Retention of Adviser. The Corporation hereby appoints the Adviser to act as an investment adviser to the Corporation and to manage the investment and reinvestment of the assets of the Corporation, subject to the supervision of the board of directors of the Corporation (the “Board”), for the period and upon the terms herein set forth, in accordance with:

(i)    the investment objectives, policies and restrictions that are set forth in the Corporation’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), as supplemented, amended or superseded from time to time;

(ii)    all other applicable federal and state laws, rules and regulations, and the Corporation’s articles of amendment and restatement (as may be amended from time to time, the “Articles”) and bylaws (as may be amended from time to time, the “Bylaws”); and

(iii)    such investment policies, directives and regulatory restrictions as the Corporation may from time to time establish or issue and communicate to the Adviser in writing.

(b)    Responsibilities of Adviser. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Adviser shall, during the term and subject to the provisions of this Agreement:

(i)    determine the composition and allocation of the Corporation’s investment portfolio, the nature and timing of any changes therein and the manner of implementing such changes;

(ii)    identify, evaluate and negotiate the structure of the investments made by the Corporation;

(iii)    execute, monitor and service the Corporation’s investments;

(iv)    place orders with respect to, and arrange for, any investment by the Corporation;


(v)    determine the securities and other assets that the Corporation shall purchase, retain, or sell;

(vi)    perform due diligence on prospective portfolio companies; and

(vii)    provide the Corporation with such other investment advisory, research and related services as the Corporation may, from time to time, reasonably request or require for the investment of its funds.

(c)    Power and Authority. To facilitate the Adviser’s performance of these undertakings, but subject to the restrictions contained herein, the Corporation hereby delegates to the Adviser (which power and authority may be delegated by the Adviser to one or moreSub-Advisers (as defined below)), and the Adviser hereby accepts, the power and authority to act on behalf of the Corporation to effectuate investment decisions for the Corporation, including the negotiation, execution and delivery of all documents relating to the Corporation’s investments and the placing of orders for other purchase or sale transactions on behalf of the Corporation. In the event that the Corporation determines to acquire debt financing (or to refinance existing debt financing), the Adviser shall seek to arrange for such financing on the Corporation’s behalf, subject to the oversight and approval of the Board. The Corporation also grants to the Adviser power and authority to engage in all activities and transactions (and anything incidental thereto) that the Adviser deems appropriate, necessary or advisable to carry out its duties pursuant to this Agreement, including the authority to provide, on behalf of the Corporation, significant managerial assistance to the Corporation’s portfolio companies to the extent required by the Investment Company Act or otherwise deemed appropriate by the Adviser.

(d)    Administrative Services. Subject to the supervision, direction and control of the Board, the provisions of the Articles and Bylaws and applicable federal and state law, the Adviser shall perform, or cause to be performed by other persons, all administrative services in connection with the operation of the Corporation.

(e)    Acceptance of Appointment. The Adviser hereby accepts such appointment and agrees during the term hereof to render the services described herein for the compensation provided herein, subject to the limitations contained herein.

(f)    Sub-Advisers. The Adviser is hereby authorized to enter into one or moresub-advisory agreements (each, a “Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with other investment advisers or other service providers (each, a “Sub-Adviser”) pursuant to which the Adviser may obtain the services of theSub-Adviser(s) to assist the Adviser in fulfilling its responsibilities hereunder, subject to the oversight of the Adviser and the Corporation. Specifically, the Adviser may retain aSub-Adviser to recommend specific securities or other investments based upon the Corporation’s investment objectives, policies and restrictions, and work, along with the Adviser, in sourcing, structuring, negotiating, arranging or effecting the acquisition or disposition of such investments and monitoring investments on behalf of the Corporation, subject to the oversight of the Adviser and the Corporation, with the scope of such services and oversight to be set forth in eachSub-Advisory Agreement.

(i)    The Adviser and not the Corporation shall be responsible for any compensation payable to anySub-Adviser; provided, however, that the Adviser shall have the right to direct the Corporation to pay directly anySub-Adviser the amounts due and payable to suchSub-Adviser from the fees and expenses otherwise payable to the Adviser under this Agreement.

(ii)    AnySub-Advisory Agreement entered into by the Adviser shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Investment Company Act, including without limitation the requirements relating to the Board and the Corporation’s stockholder approval thereunder, and other applicable federal and state law.

(iii)    AnySub-Adviser shall be subject to the same fiduciary duties imposed on the Adviser pursuant to this Agreement, the Investment Company Act and the Advisers Act, as well as other applicable federal and state law.

(g)    Independent Contractor Status. The Adviser shall, for all purposes herein provided, be deemed to be an independent contractor and, except as expressly provided or authorized herein, shall have no authority to act for or represent the Corporation in any way or otherwise be deemed an agent of the Corporation.

2


(h)    Record Retention. Subject to review by, and the overall control of, the Board, the Adviser shall keep and preserve for the period required by the Investment Company Act or the Advisers Act, as applicable, any books and records relevant to the provision of its investment advisory services to the Corporation and shall specifically maintain all books and records with respect to the Corporation’s portfolio transactions and shall render to the Board such periodic and special reports as the Board may reasonably request or as may be required under applicable federal and state law, and shall make such records available for inspection by the Board and its authorized agents, at any time and from time to time during normal business hours. The Adviser agrees that all records that it maintains for the Corporation are the property of the Corporation and shall surrender promptly to the Corporation any such records upon the Corporation’s request and upon termination of this Agreement pursuant toSection 9, provided that the Adviser may retain a copy of such records. The Adviser shall have the right to retain copies, or originals where required by Rule204-2 promulgated under the Advisers Act, of such records to the extent required by applicable law.

The following provisions in thisSection 1 shall apply for only so long as the shares of common stock of the Corporation (“Common Stock”) are not listed on a national securities exchange.

(i)    Administrator. The Adviser shall, upon request by an official or agency administering the securities laws of a state, province or commonwealth (an “Administrator”), submit to such Administrator the reports and statements required to be distributed to the Corporation’s stockholders pursuant to this Agreement, the Corporation’s then effective Registration Statement on FormN-2 (as amended from time to time, the “Registration Statement”) and applicable federal and state law.

(j)    Fiduciary Duty. It is acknowledged that the Adviser shall have a fiduciary responsibility for the safekeeping and use of all funds and assets of the Corporation, whether or not in the Adviser’s immediate possession or control. The Adviser shall not employ, or permit another to employ, such funds or assets in any manner except for the exclusive benefit of the Corporation. The Adviser shall not, by entry into an agreement with any stockholder of the Corporation or otherwise, contract away the fiduciary obligation owed to the Corporation and the Corporation’s stockholders under common law.

2.The Corporations Responsibilities and Expenses Payable by the Corporation and the Adviser.

(a)    Adviser Personnel. All personnel of the Adviser, when and to the extent engaged in providing investment advisory services herein, and the compensation and routine overhead expenses of such personnel allocable to such services, shall be provided and paid for by the Adviser or its affiliates and not by the Corporation.

(b)    Costs. Subject to the limitations on reimbursement of the Adviser as set forth inSection 2(c) below, the Corporation, either directly or through reimbursement to the Adviser, shall bear all other costs and expenses of its operations and transactions, including (without limitation): expenses deemed to be “organization and offering expenses” of the Corporation for purposes of Conduct Rule 2310(a)(12) of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (for purposes of this Agreement, such expenses, exclusive of commissions, the dealer manager fee, any discounts and other similar expenses paid by investors at the time of sale of the stock of the Corporation, are hereinafter referred to as “Organization and Offering Costs”); corporate and organizational expenses relating to offerings of shares of Common Stock, subject to limitations included in this Agreement; the cost of calculating the Corporation’s net asset value for each share class, as applicable, including the cost of any third-party pricing or valuation services; the cost of effecting sales and repurchases of shares of Common Stock and other securities; investment advisory fees; fees payable to third parties including, without limitation, agents, consultants or other advisors, relating to, or associated with, making investments, monitoring investments and valuing investments, including fees and expenses associated with performing due diligence reviews of prospective investments; interest payments on the Corporation’s debt or related obligations; transfer agent and custodial fees; research and market data (including news and quotation equipment and services, and any computer hardware and connectivity hardware (e.g., telephone and fiber optic lines) incorporated into the cost of

3


obtaining such research and market data); fees and expenses associated with marketing efforts; federal and state registration or notification fees; federal, state and local taxes; fees and expenses of directors not also serving in an executive officer capacity for the Corporation or the Adviser; costs of proxy statements, stockholders’ reports, notices and other filings; fidelity bond, directors and officers errors and omissions liability insurance and other insurance premiums; direct costs such as printing, mailing, long distance telephone and staff costs; fees and expenses associated with accounting, corporate governance, independent audits and outside legal costs; costs associated with the Corporation’s reporting and compliance obligations under the Investment Company Act and applicable federal and state securities laws, including compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended; all costs of registration and listing the Corporation’s Common Stock or other securities on any securities exchange; brokerage commissions for the Corporation’s investments; all other expenses incurred by the Adviser, anySub-Adviser or the Corporation in connection with administering the Corporation’s business, including expenses incurred by the Adviser or anySub-Adviser in performing administrative services for the Corporation and administrative personnel paid by the Adviser or anySub-Adviser, to the extent they are not controlling persons of the Adviser, anySub-Adviser or any of their respective affiliates; and any expenses incurred outside of the ordinary course of business, including, without limitation, costs incurred in connection with any claim, litigation, arbitration, mediation, government investigation or similar proceeding and indemnification expenses as provided for in the Articles or the Bylaws.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Corporation shall not be liable for Organization and Offering Costs to the extent that Organization and Offering Costs, together with all prior Organization and Offering Costs, exceed 1.5% of the aggregate gross proceeds from the offering of the Corporation’s securities.

The following provisions in thisSection 2(c) shall apply for only so long as the shares of Common Stock are not listed on a national securities exchange.

(c)    Limitations on Reimbursement of Expenses.

(i)    In addition to the compensation paid to the Adviser pursuant toSection 3, the Corporation shall reimburse the Adviser for all expenses of the Corporation incurred by the Adviser as well as the actual cost of goods and services used for or by the Corporation and obtained from entities not affiliated with the Adviser. The Adviser may be reimbursed for the administrative services performed by it on behalf of the Corporation; provided, however, the reimbursement shall be an amount equal to the lower of the Adviser’s actual cost or the amount the Corporation would be required to pay third parties for the provision of comparable administrative services in the same geographic location; and provided, further, that such costs are reasonably allocated to the Corporation on the basis of assets, revenues, time allocations and/or other reasonable metrics, consistent with past practice (but solely to the extent such past practice is not inconsistent with the policies of the Adviser). No reimbursement shall be permitted for services for which the Adviser is entitled to compensation by way of a separate fee. Excluded from the allowable reimbursement shall be:

(A)    rent or depreciation, utilities, capital equipment, and other administrative items of the Adviser; and

(B)    salaries, fringe benefits, travel expenses and other administrative items incurred by or allocated to any controlling person (as defined in the Investment Company Act) of the Adviser (or any individual performing such services) or a holder of 10% or greater equity interest in the Adviser (or any person having the power to direct or cause the direction of the Adviser, whether by ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise).

(d)    Periodic Reimbursement. Expenses incurred by the Adviser on behalf of the Corporation and payable pursuant to thisSection 2 shall be reimbursed no less than monthly to the Adviser. The Adviser shall prepare a statement documenting the expenses of the Corporation and the calculation of the reimbursement and shall deliver such statement to the Corporation prior to full reimbursement.

4


3.Compensation of the Adviser.

The Corporation agrees to pay, and the Adviser agrees to accept, as compensation for the services provided by the Adviser herein, a base management fee (the “Base Management Fee”) and an incentive fee (the “Incentive Fee”) as hereinafter set forth. Any of the fees payable to the Adviser under this Agreement for any partial month or calendar quarter shall be appropriately prorated. The Adviser may agree to temporarily or permanently waive, in whole or in part, the Base Management Fee and/or the Incentive Fee. See Appendix A for examples of how these fees are calculated. Prior to the payment of any fee to the Adviser, the Corporation shall obtain written instructions from the Adviser with respect to any waiver or deferral of any portion of such fees. Any portion of a deferred fee payable to the Adviser and not paid over to the Adviser with respect to any month, calendar quarter or year shall be deferred without interest and may be paid over in any such other month prior to the termination of this Agreement, as the Adviser may determine upon written notice to the Corporation.

(a)    Base Management Fee. The Base Management Fee shall be calculated at an annual rate of 1.5% of the Corporation’s average weekly gross assets. The Base Management Fee shall be payable quarterly in arrears, and shall be calculated based on the average weekly value of the Corporation’s gross assets during the most recently completed calendar quarter. All or any part of the Base Management Fee not taken as to any quarter shall be deferred without interest and may be taken in such other quarter as the Adviser shall determine.

(b)    Incentive Fee. The Incentive Fee shall consist of two parts, as follows:

(i)    The first part of the Incentive Fee, referred to as the “Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income,” shall be calculated and payable quarterly in arrears based on the Corporation’s “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income” for the immediately preceding quarter. The payment of the Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income shall be subject to a quarterly hurdle rate, expressed as a rate of return on Adjusted Capital (as defined below) at the beginning of the most recently completed calendar quarter, of 1.75% (7.0% annualized) (the “Hurdle Rate”), subject to a “catch up” feature (as described below).

For this purpose, “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income” means interest income, dividend income and any other income (including any other fees, other than fees for providing managerial assistance, such as commitment, origination, structuring, diligence and consulting fees or other fees that the Corporation receives from portfolio companies) accrued during the calendar quarter, minus the Corporation’s operating expenses for the quarter (including the Base Management Fee, expenses payable under this Agreement and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued and outstanding preferred shares, but excluding the Incentive Fee).Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income includes, in the case of investments with a deferred interest feature (such as original issue discount debt instruments withpayment-in-kind interest and zero coupon securities), accrued income that the Corporation has not yet received in cash.Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not include any realized capital gains, realized capital losses or unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation.

For purposes of this fee, “Adjusted Capital” shall mean cumulative gross proceeds generated from sales of the Corporation’s Common Stock (including proceeds from the Corporation’s distribution reinvestment plan) reduced for distributions fromnon-liquidating dispositions of the Corporation’s investments paid to stockholders and amounts paid for share repurchases pursuant to the Corporation’s share repurchase program.

The calculation of the Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income for each quarter is as follows:

(A)    No Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income shall be payable to the Adviser in any calendar quarter in which the Corporation’sPre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not exceed the Hurdle Rate;

(B)    100% of the Corporation’sPre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, if any, that exceeds the Hurdle Rate but is less than or equal to 2.1875% in any calendar quarter (8.75% annualized) shall be payable to the Adviser. This portion of the Corporation’s Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income is

5


referred to as the “catch up” and is intended to provide the Adviser with an incentive fee of 20.0% on all of the Corporation’sPre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income when the Corporation’sPre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income reaches 2.1875% (8.75% annualized) in any calendar quarter; and

(C)    For any quarter in which the Corporation’sPre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income exceeds 2.1875% (8.75% annualized), the Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income shall equal 20.0% of the amount of the Corporation’sPre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, as the Hurdle Rate andcatch-up will have been achieved.

(ii)    The second part of the Incentive Fee, referred to as the “Incentive Fee on Capital Gains,” shall be an incentive fee on capital gains earned on liquidated investments from the portfolio and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of this Agreement). This fee shall equal 20.0% of the Corporation’s incentive fee capital gains, which shall equal the Corporation’s realized capital gains on a cumulative basis from inception, calculated as of the end of the applicable period, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive fees.

4.Covenants of the Adviser.

(a)    Adviser Status. The Adviser is registered as an investment adviser under the Advisers Act and covenants that it will maintain such registration. The Adviser agrees that its activities will at all times be in compliance in all material respects with all applicable federal and state laws governing its operations and investments.

The following provisions in thisSection 4 shall apply for only so long as the shares of Common Stock are not listed on a national securities exchange.

(b)    Reports to Stockholders. The Adviser shall prepare or shall cause to be prepared and distributed to stockholders during each year the following reports of the Corporation (either included in a periodic report filed with the SEC or distributed in a separate report):

(i)    Quarterly Reports. Within sixty (60) days of the end of each calendar quarter, a report containing the same financial information contained in the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q filed by the Corporation under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

(ii)    Annual Report. Within one hundred and twenty (120) days after the end of the Corporation’s fiscal year, an annual report containing:

(A)    A balance sheet as of the end of each fiscal year and statements of income, equity, and cash flow, for the year then ended, all of which shall be prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and accompanied by an auditor’s report containing an opinion of an independent certified public accountant;

(B)    A report of the activities of the Corporation during the period covered by the report;

(C)    Where forecasts have been provided to the Corporation’s stockholders, a table comparing the forecasts previously provided with the actual results during the period covered by the report; and

(D)    A report setting forth distributions by the Corporation for the period covered thereby and separately identifying distributions from (i) cash flow from operations during the period; (ii) cash flow from operations during a prior period which have been held as reserves; and (iii) proceeds from disposition of the Corporation’s assets.

(iii)    Previous Reimbursement Reports. The Adviser shall prepare or shall cause to be prepared a report, prepared in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants United States

6


Auditing Standards relating to special reports, and distributed to stockholders not less than annually, containing an itemized list of the costs reimbursed to the Adviser pursuant toSection 2(c) for the previous fiscal year. The special report shall at a minimum provide:

(A)    A review of the time allocations of individual employees, the costs of whose services were reimbursed; and

(B)    A review of the specific nature of the work performed by each such employee.

(iv)    Proposed Reimbursement Reports. The Adviser shall prepare or shall cause to be prepared a report containing an itemized estimate of all proposed expenses for which it shall receive reimbursements pursuant toSection 2(c) of this Agreement for the next fiscal year, together with a breakdown by year of such expenses reimbursed in each of the last five public programs formed by the Adviser.

(c)    Reports to Administrators. The Adviser shall, upon written request of any Administrator, submit any of the reports and statements to be prepared and distributed by it pursuant to thisSection 4 to such Administrator.

(d)    Reserves. In performing its duties hereunder, the Adviser shall cause the Corporation to provide for adequate reserves for normal replacements and contingencies (but not for payment of fees payable to the Adviser hereunder) by causing the Corporation to retain a reasonable percentage of proceeds from offerings and revenues.

(e)    Recommendations Regarding Reviews. From time to time and not less than quarterly, the Adviser must review the Corporation’s accounts to determine whether cash distributions are appropriate. The Corporation may, subject to authorization by the Board, distribute pro rata to the stockholders funds received by the Corporation which the Adviser deems unnecessary to retain in the Corporation.

(f)    Temporary Investments. The Adviser shall, in its sole discretion, temporarily place proceeds from offerings by the Corporation into short term, highly liquid investments which, in its reasonable judgment, afford appropriate safety of principal during such time as it is determining the composition and allocation of the portfolio of the Corporation and the nature, timing and implementation of any changes thereto pursuant toSection 1(b); provided however, that the Adviser shall be under no fiduciary obligation to select any such short-term, highly liquid investment based solely on any yield or return of such investment. The Adviser shall cause any proceeds of the offering of the Corporation’s securities not committed for investment within the later of two (2) years from the initial date of effectiveness of the Registration Statement or one year from termination of the offering, unless a longer period is permitted by the applicable Administrator, to be paid as a distribution to the stockholders of the Corporation as a return of capital without deduction of Front End Fees (as defined below).

5.Brokerage Commissions, Limitations on Front End Fees.

(a)    Brokerage Commissions. The Adviser is hereby authorized, to the fullest extent now or hereafter permitted by law, to cause the Corporation to pay a member of a national securities exchange, broker or dealer an amount of commission for effecting a securities transaction in excess of the amount of commission another member of such exchange, broker or dealer would have charged for effecting that transaction, if the Adviser determines in good faith, taking into account such factors as price (including the applicable brokerage commission or dealer spread), size of order, difficulty of execution, and operational facilities of the firm and the firm’s risk and skill in positioning blocks of securities, that such amount of commission is reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage and/or research services provided by such member, broker or dealer, viewed in terms of either that particular transaction or its overall responsibilities with respect to the Corporation’s portfolio, and is consistent with the Adviser’s duty to seek the best execution on behalf of the Corporation.

7


The following provisions in thisSection 5 shall apply for only so long as the shares of Common Stock are not listed on a national securities exchange.

(b)    Limitations. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary:

(i)    All fees and expenses paid by any party for any services rendered to organize the Corporation and to acquire assets for the Corporation (“Front End Fees”) shall be reasonable and shall not exceed 15% of the gross offering proceeds, regardless of the source of payment. Any reimbursement to the Adviser or any other person for deferred organizational and offering costs, including any interest thereon, if any, will be included within this 15% limitation.

(ii)    The Adviser shall commit at leasteighty-two percent (82%) of the gross offering proceeds towards the investment or reinvestment of assets and reserves as set forth inSection 4(d) above on behalf of the Corporation. The remaining proceeds may be used to pay Front End Fees.

6.Other Activities of the Adviser.

The services provided by the Adviser to the Corporation are not exclusive, and the Adviser may engage in any other business or render similar or different services to others including, without limitation, the direct or indirect sponsorship or management of other investment based accounts or commingled pools of capital, however structured, having investment objectives similar to those of the Corporation, so long as its services to the Corporation hereunder are not impaired thereby, and nothing in this Agreement shall limit or restrict the right of any manager, partner, member (including its members and the owners of its members), officer or employee of the Adviser to engage in any other business or to devote his or her time and attention in part to any other business, whether of a similar or dissimilar nature, or to receive any fees or compensation in connection therewith (including fees for serving as a director of, or providing consulting services to, one or more of the Corporation’s portfolio companies, subject to applicable law). The Adviser assumes no responsibility under this Agreement other than to render the services called for hereunder. It is understood that directors, officers, employees and stockholders of the Corporation are or may become interested in the Adviser and its affiliates, as directors, officers, employees, partners, stockholders, members, managers or otherwise, and that the Adviser and directors, officers, employees, partners, stockholders, members and managers of the Adviser and its affiliates are or may become similarly interested in the Corporation as stockholders or otherwise.

7.Responsibility of Dual Directors, Officers and/or Employees.

If any person who is a manager, partner, member, officer or employee of the Adviser is or becomes a director, officer and/or employee of the Corporation and acts as such in any business of the Corporation, then such manager, partner, member, officer and/or employee of the Adviser shall be deemed to be acting in such capacity solely for the Corporation, and not as a manager, partner, member, officer or employee of the Adviser or under the control or direction of the Adviser, even if paid by the Adviser.

8.Indemnification; Limitation of Liability.

(a)    Indemnification. The Adviser and anySub-Adviser (and their officers, managers, partners, members (and their members, including the owners of their members), agents, employees, controlling persons (as defined in the Investment Company Act) and any other person or entity affiliated with, or acting on behalf of the Adviser orSub-Adviser) (each an “Indemnified Party” and, collectively, the “Indemnified Parties”), shall not be liable to the Corporation for any action taken or omitted to be taken by any such Indemnified Party in connection with the performance of any of its duties or obligations under this Agreement or otherwise as an investment adviser of the Corporation (except to the extent specified in Section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act concerning loss resulting from a breach of fiduciary duty (as the same is finally determined by judicial proceedings) with respect to the receipt of compensation for services), and the Corporation shall indemnify, defend and protect the Indemnified Parties (each of whom shall be deemed a third party beneficiary hereof) and hold them harmless

8


from and against all damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) (“Losses”) incurred by the Indemnified Parties in or by reason of any pending, threatened or completed action, suit, investigation or other proceeding (including an action or suit by or in the right of the Corporation or its security holders) arising out of or otherwise based upon the performance of any of the Indemnified Parties’ duties or obligations under this Agreement, anySub-Advisory Agreement, or otherwise as an investment adviser of the Corporation, to the extent such Losses are not fully reimbursed by insurance, and to the extent that such indemnification would not be inconsistent with the laws of the State of Maryland, the Investment Company Act or other applicable law, the Articles or the provisions of Section II.G of the Omnibus Guidelines published by the North American Securities Administrators Association on March 29, 1992, as it may be amended from time to time. In addition, notwithstanding any of the foregoing to the contrary, the provisions of thisSection 8 shall not be construed so as to provide for the indemnification of any Indemnified Party for any liability (including liability under federal securities laws which, under certain circumstances, impose liability even on persons that act in good faith), to the extent (but only to the extent) that such indemnification would be in violation of applicable law, but shall be construed so as to effectuate the provisions of thisSection 8 to the fullest extent permitted by law.

The following provisions in thisSection 8 shall apply for only so long as the shares of Common Stock are not listed on a national securities exchange.

(b)    Limitations on Indemnification. NotwithstandingSection 8(a) to the contrary, the Corporation shall not provide for indemnification of the Indemnified Parties for any Loss suffered by the Indemnified Parties, nor shall the Corporation provide that any of the Indemnified Parties be held harmless for any Loss suffered by the Corporation, unless all of the following conditions are met:

(i)    the Indemnified Party has determined, in good faith, that the course of conduct which caused the Loss was in the best interests of the Corporation;

(ii)    the Indemnified Party was acting on behalf of or performing services for the Corporation;

(iii)    such Loss was not the result of negligence or misconduct by the Indemnified Party; and

(iv)    such indemnification or agreement to hold harmless is recoverable only out of the Corporation’s net assets and not from stockholders.

Furthermore, the Indemnified Party shall not be indemnified for any Losses arising from or out of an alleged violation of federal or state securities laws unless one or more of the following conditions are met:

(i)    there has been a successful adjudication on the merits of each count involving alleged securities law violations;

(ii)    such claims have been dismissed with prejudice on the merits by a court of competent jurisdiction; or

(iii)    a court of competent jurisdiction approves a settlement of the claims against a particular indemnitee and finds that indemnification of the settlement and related costs should be made, and the court of law considering the request for indemnification has been advised of the position of the SEC and the published position of any state securities regulatory authority in which securities of the Corporation were offered or sold as to indemnification for violations of securities laws.

(c)    Advancement of Funds. The Corporation shall be permitted to advance funds to the Indemnified Party for legal expenses and other costs incurred as a result of any legal action for which indemnification is being sought and will do so if:

(i)    the proceeding relates to acts or omissions with respect to the performance of duties or services on behalf of the Corporation;

9


(ii)    the Indemnified Party provides the Corporation with written affirmation of his or her good faith belief that the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification by the Corporation has been met;

(iii)    the legal proceeding was initiated by a third party who is not a stockholder or, if by a stockholder of the Corporation acting in his or her capacity as such, a court of competent jurisdiction approves such advancement; and

(iv)    the Indemnified Party provides the Corporation with a written agreement to repay the amount paid or reimbursed by the Corporation, together with the applicable legal rate of interest thereon, in cases in which such Indemnified Party is found not to be entitled to indemnification.

9.Duration and Termination of Agreement.

(a)    Term. This Agreement shall remain in effect for two (2) years commencing on the date hereof, and thereafter shall continue automatically for successive annual periods, provided that such continuance is specifically approved at least annually by (i) the vote of the Board, or by the vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Corporation and (ii) the vote of a majority of the Corporation’s directors who are not parties to this Agreement or “interested persons” (as such term is defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act) of any such party (“Independent Directors”), in accordance with the requirements of the Investment Company Act.

(b)    Termination. This Agreement may be terminated at any time, without the payment of any penalty, upon sixty (60) days’ written notice (i) by the Corporation to the Adviser, (x) upon the vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Corporation (within the meaning of Section 2(a)(42) of the Investment Company Act), or (y) by the vote of the Corporation’s Independent Directors, or (ii) by the Adviser to the Corporation. This Agreement shall automatically terminate in the event of its “assignment” (as such term is defined for purposes of Section 15(a)(4) of the Investment Company Act). The provisions ofSection 8 of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, and the Adviser shall remain entitled to the benefits thereof, notwithstanding any termination of this Agreement.

(c)    Payments to and Duties of Adviser Upon Termination.

(i)    After the termination of this Agreement, the Adviser shall not be entitled to compensation or reimbursement for further services provided hereunder, except that it shall be entitled to receive from the Corporation within thirty (30) days after the effective date of such termination all unpaid reimbursements and all earned but unpaid fees payable to the Adviser prior to termination of this Agreement.

(ii)    The Adviser shall promptly upon termination:

(A)    Deliver to the Board a full accounting, including a statement showing all payments collected by it and a statement of all money held by it, covering the period following the date of the last accounting furnished to the Board;

(B)    Deliver to the Board all assets and documents of the Corporation then in custody of the Adviser; and

(C)    Cooperate with the Corporation to provide an orderly management transition.

The following provisions in thisSection 9 shall apply for only so long as the shares of Common Stock are not listed on a national securities exchange.

(d)    Other Matters. Without the approval of holders of a majority of the shares of Common Stock entitled to vote on the matter, the Adviser shall not: (i) amend this Agreement except for amendments that do not adversely affect the interests of the stockholders; (ii) voluntarily withdraw as the Adviser unless such withdrawal would not affect the tax status of the Corporation and would not materially adversely affect the stockholders;

10


(iii) appoint a new Adviser; (iv) sell all or substantially all of the Corporation’s assets other than in the ordinary course of the Corporation’s business; or (v) cause the merger or other reorganization of the Corporation. In the event that the Adviser should withdraw pursuant to (ii) above, the withdrawing Adviser shall pay all expenses incurred as a result of its withdrawal. The Corporation may terminate the Adviser’s interest in the Corporation’s revenues, expenses, income, losses, distributions and capital by payment of an amount equal to the then present fair market value of the terminated Adviser’s interest, determined by agreement of the terminated Adviser and the Corporation. If the Corporation and the Adviser cannot agree upon such amount, then such amount will be determined in accordance with the then current rules of the American Arbitration Association. The expenses of such arbitration shall be borne equally by the terminated Adviser and the Corporation. The method of payment to the terminated Adviser must be fair and must protect the solvency and liquidity of the Corporation.

10.Conflicts of Interests and Prohibited Activities.

The following provisions in thisSection 10 shall apply for only so long as the Common Stock of the Corporation are not listed on a national securities exchange.

(a)    No Exclusive Agreement. The Adviser is not hereby granted or entitled to an exclusive right to sell or exclusive employment to sell assets for the Corporation.

(b)    Rebates, Kickbacks and Reciprocal Arrangements.

The Adviser agrees that it shall not (A) receive or accept any rebate,give-up or similar arrangement that is prohibited under applicable federal or state securities laws, (B) participate in any reciprocal business arrangement that would circumvent provisions of applicable federal or state securities laws governing conflicts of interest or investment restrictions, or (C) enter into any agreement, arrangement or understanding that would circumvent the restrictions against dealing with affiliates or promoters under applicable federal or state securities laws.

The Adviser agrees that it shall not directly or indirectly pay or award any fees or commissions or other compensation to any person or entity engaged to sell the Corporation’s Common Stock or give investment advice to a potential stockholder; provided, however, that this subsection shall not prohibit the payment to a registered broker-dealer or other properly licensed agent of sales commissions for selling or distributing the Corporation’s Common Stock.

(c)    Commingling. The Adviser covenants that it shall not permit or cause to be permitted the Corporation’s funds to be commingled with the funds of any other entity. Nothing in thisSection 10(c) shall prohibit the Adviser from establishing a master fiduciary account pursuant to which separatesub-trust accounts are established for the benefit of affiliated programs, provided that the Corporation’s funds are protected from the claims of other programs and creditors of such programs.

11.Proxy Voting.

The Adviser will exercise voting rights on any assets held in the portfolio securities of portfolio companies. The Adviser is obligated to furnish to the Corporation, in a timely manner, a record of all proxies voted in such form and format that complies with applicable federal statutes and regulations.

12.Notices.

Any notice under this Agreement shall be given in writing, addressed and delivered or mailed, postage prepaid, to the other party at its principal office.

11


13.Amendments.

This Agreement may be amended in writing by mutual consent of the parties hereto, subject to the provisions of the Investment Company Act and the Articles.

14.Entire Agreement; Governing Law.

This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes all prior agreements, understandings and arrangements with respect to the subject matter hereof. Notwithstanding the place where this Agreement may be executed by any of the parties hereto, this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. For so long as the Corporation is regulated as a BDC under the Investment Company Act, this Agreement shall also be construed in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Investment Company Act. In such case, to the extent the applicable laws of the State of New York, or any of the provisions herein, conflict with the provisions of the Investment Company Act, the latter shall control.

15.Severability.

If any provision of this Agreement shall be declared illegal, invalid or unenforceable in any jurisdiction, then such provision shall be deemed to be severable from this Agreement (to the extent permitted by law) and in any event such illegality, invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the remainder hereof.

16.Counterparts.

This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original copy and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument binding on all parties hereto, notwithstanding that all parties shall not have signed the same counterpart.

17.Third Party Beneficiaries.

Except for anySub-Adviser (with respect toSection 8) and any Indemnified Party, suchSub-Adviser and the Indemnified Parties each being an intended beneficiary of this Agreement, this Agreement is for the sole benefit of the parties hereto and their permitted assigns and nothing herein express or implied shall give or be construed to give to any person, other than the parties hereto and such assigns, any legal or equitable rights hereunder.

18.Survival.

The provisions ofSections 8,9(b),9(c),14,17 and this Section 18 shall survive termination of this Agreement.

19.Insurance.

Subject to the requirements of Rule17d-1(d)(7) under the Investment Company Act, the Corporation shall acquire and maintain a directors and officers liability insurance policy or similar insurance policy, which may name the Adviser and anySub-Adviser each as an additional insured party (each an “Additional Insured Party” and collectively the “Additional Insured Parties”). Such insurance policy shall include reasonable coverage from a reputable insurer. The Corporation shall make all premium payments required to maintain such policy in full force and effect;provided,however, each Additional Insured Party, if any, shall pay to the Corporation, in advance of the due date of such premium, its allocated share of the premium. Irrespective of whether the Adviser and anySub-Adviser is a named Additional Insured Party on such policy, the Corporation shall provide the Adviser and anySub-Adviser with written notice upon receipt of any notice of: (a) any default under such policy; (b) any pending or threatened termination, cancellation ornon-renewal of such policy or (c) any coverage limitation or reduction with respect to such policy. The foregoing provisions of thisSection 19 notwithstanding, the Corporation shall not be required to acquire or maintain any insurance policy to the extent that the same is not available upon commercially reasonable pricing terms or at all, as determined in good faith by the required majority (as defined in Section 57(o) of the Investment Company Act) of the Board.

12


20.Brand Usage.

The Adviser conducts its investment advisory business under, and owns all rights to, the trademark “FS/KKR Advisor” and the “FS/KKR Advisor” design (collectively, the “Brand”). In connection with the Corporation’s (a) public filings; (b) requests for information from state and federal regulators; (c) offering materials and advertising materials; and (d) investor communications, the Corporation may state in such materials that investment advisory services are being provided by the Adviser to the Corporation under the terms of this Agreement. The Adviser hereby grants anon-exclusive,non-transferable,non-sublicensable and royalty-free license (the “License”) to the Corporation for the use of the Brand solely as permitted in the foregoing sentence. Prior to using the Brand in any manner, the Corporation shall submit all proposed uses to the Adviser for prior written approval solely to the extent the Corporation’s use of the Brand or any combination or derivation thereof has materially changed from the Corporation’s use of the Brand previously approved by the Adviser. The Adviser reserves the right to terminate the License immediately upon written notice for any reason, including if the usage is not in compliance with its standards and policies. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the term of the License granted under thisSection 20 shall be for the term of this Agreement only, including renewals and extensions, and the right to use the Brand as provided herein shall terminate immediately upon the termination of this Agreement. The Corporation agrees that the Adviser is the sole owner of the Brand, and any and all goodwill in the Brand arising from the Corporation’s use shall inure solely to the benefit of the Adviser. Without limiting the foregoing, the License shall have no effect on the Corporation’s ownership rights of the works within which the Brand shall be used.

[Remainder of page left intentionally blank]

13


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed on the date above written.

FS INVESTMENT CORPORATION II
By:

Name:
Title:
FS/KKR ADVISOR, LLC
By:

Name:
Title:

[Signature Page to Investment Advisory and Administrative Services Agreement]


Appendix A

NOTE: All percentages herein refer to Adjusted Capital.

Example 1: Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income for Each Calendar Quarter*

Scenario 1

Assumptions

Investment income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) = 1.25%

Hurdle Rate(1) = 1.75%

Base Management Fee(2) = 0.375%

Other expenses (legal, accounting, custodian, transfer agent, etc.)(3) = 0.2%

Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income

(investment income — (Base Management Fee + other expenses)) = 0.675%

Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not exceed the Hurdle Rate, therefore there is no Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income payable.

Scenario 2

Assumptions

Investment income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) = 2.675%

Hurdle Rate(1) = 1.75%

Base Management Fee(2) = 0.375%

Other expenses (legal, accounting, custodian, transfer agent, etc.)(3) = 0.2%

Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income

(investment income — (Base Management Fee + other expenses)) = 2.1%

Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income = 100% × Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income (subject to “catch-up”)(4)

= 100% x (2.1% — 1.75%)

= 0.35%

Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income exceeds the Hurdle Rate, but does not fully satisfy the “catch-up” provision, therefore the Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income is 0.35%.

Scenario 3

Assumptions

Investment income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) = 3.5%

Hurdle Rate(1) = 1.75%

Base Management Fee(2) = 0.375%

Other expenses (legal, accounting, custodian, transfer agent, etc.)(3) = 0.2%

Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income

(investment income — (Base Management Fee + other expenses)) = 2.925%

Catch up = 100% × Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income (subject to “catch-up”)(4)

Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income = 100% × “catch-up” + (20.0% × (Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income — 2.1875%))

A-1


Catch-up          = 2.1875% — 1.75%

     = 0.4375%

Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income = (100% × 0.4375%) + (20.0% × (2.925% — 2.1875%))

     = 0.4375% + (20.0% × 0.7375%)

     = 0.4375% + 0.1475%

     = 0.585%

Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income exceeds the Hurdle Rate and fully satisfies the “catch-up” provision, therefore the Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income is 0.585%.

(1)Represents 7.0% annualized Hurdle Rate.
(2)Represents 1.5% annualized Base Management Fee on average weekly gross assets. Examples assume assets are equal to Adjusted Capital.
(3)Excludes organizational and offering costs.
(4)The “catch-up” provision is intended to provide the Adviser with an Incentive Fee of 20.0% on all Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income when the Corporation’s net investment income exceeds 2.1875% in any calendar quarter.

Example 2: Incentive Fee on Capital Gains*

Scenario 1:

Assumptions

Year 1: $20 million investment made in Company A (“Investment A”), and $30 million investment made in Company B (“Investment B”)

Year 2: Investment A sold for $50 million and fair market value (“FMV”) of Investment B determined to be $32 million

Year 3: FMV of Investment B determined to be $25 million

Year 4: Investment B sold for $31 million

The Incentive Fee on Capital Gains would be:

Year 1: None

Year 2: Incentive Fee on Capital Gains of $6 million ($30 million realized capital gains on sale of Investment A multiplied by 20.0%)

Year 3: None, because $5 million (20.0% multiplied by ($30 million cumulative capital gains less $5 million cumulative capital depreciation)) less $6 million (previous capital gain incentive fee paid to the Adviser in Year 2) is less than $0

Year 4: Incentive Fee on Capital Gains of $200,000, because $6.2 million ($31 million cumulative realized capital gains multiplied by 20.0%) less $6 million (previous capital gain incentive fee paid to the Adviser in Year 2) is $200,000

A-2


Scenario 2

Assumptions

Year 1: $20 million investment made in Company A (“Investment A”), $30 million investment made in Company B (“Investment B”) and $25 million investment made in Company C (“Investment C”)

Year 2: Investment A sold for $50 million, FMV of Investment B determined to be $25 million and FMV of Investment C determined to be $25 million

Year 3: FMV of Investment B determined to be $27 million and Investment C sold for $30 million

Year 4: FMV of Investment B determined to be $35 million

Year 5: Investment B sold for $20 million

The Incentive Fee on Capital Gains, if any, would be:

Year 1: None

Year 2: $5 million Incentive Fee on Capital Gains, because 20.0% multiplied by $25 million ($30 million realized capital gains on Investment A less unrealized capital depreciation on Investment B) is $5 million

Year 3: $1.4 million Incentive Fee on Capital Gains, because $6.4 million (20.0% multiplied by $32 million ($35 million cumulative realized capital gains less $3 million unrealized capital depreciation)) less $5 million capital gain incentive fee paid to the Adviser in Year 2 is $1.4 million

Year 4: None

Year 5: None, because $5 million (20.0% multiplied by $25 million (cumulative realized capital gains of $35 million less realized capital losses of $10 million)) less $6.4 million cumulative capital gain incentive fee paid to the Adviser in Year 2 and Year 3 is less than $0

*The returns shown are for illustrative purposes only. No Subordinated Incentive Fee on Income is payable to the Adviser in any calendar quarter in which the Corporation’s Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not exceed the Hurdle Rate. Positive returns are shown to demonstrate the fee structure and there is no guarantee that positive returns will be realized. Actual returns may vary from those shown in the examples above.

A-3


FS INVESTMENT CORPORATION II

201 ROUSE BOULEVARD

PHILADELPHIA, PA 19112

LOGO

VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above.

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before thecut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the website and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

 

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically viae-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

 

GENERAL QUESTIONS

1-855-486-7904

 

VOTE BY PHONE -1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before thecut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

 

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

 

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:                                                                                                                  E09825-P79548                              KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

— — — — —  —  —  — — —  —  —  — — — —  —  — —  —  —  —  —  — —  —  — —  —  —  —  —  —  —  — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

 

 

DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

 

 FS KKR CAPITAL CORP. II

For

All

Withhold

All

For All

Except

     

FS INVESTMENT
CORPORATION III

To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.

              

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following:

1.  Election of Class C Directors

       Nominees:

                    

     Class C Directors:

 01.  Michael C. Forman

 02.  Richard Goldstein

 03.  James H. Kropp

 04.  Elizabeth Sandler

   
  
   The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposals:proposal:    For      Against     Abstain  
   

 

1.2.  To approve a new investment advisory and administrative services agreement, by and betweenthe application of the reduced asset coverage requirements in Section 61(a)(2) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, to the Company, and FSIC II Advisor, LLC (“FSIC II Advisor”) and a new investment advisory and administrative services agreement, by and betweenwhich would permit the Company and KKR Credit Advisors (US) LLC (“KKR Credit”), pursuant to which FSIC II Advisor and KKR Credit will act as investmentco-advisersincrease the maximum amount of leverage that it is permitted to incur by reducing the asset coverage requirement applicable to the Company.Company from 200% to 150%.

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

2.3.  To approve a new investment advisory and administrative services agreement, by and betweenthe proposal to allow the Company and FS/KKR Advisor, LLC,in future offerings, following the listing of the Company’s common stock on a newly-formed investment adviser jointly operated by an affiliate of Franklin Square Holdings, L.P. and KKR Credit (the “Joint Advisor”), pursuantnational securities exchange, to which the Joint Advisor will act as investment advisersell its shares below net asset value per share in order to the Company.provide flexibility for future sales.

  

  

  

 
NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
 
   Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer.    
                      
              

          
      
      

              
    

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

 

  

Date

 

     

Signature (Joint Owners)

 

  

Date

 

     

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Special Meeting:

The Notice and Proxy Statement are available at www.proxyvote.com.


— — — — —  —  —  — — —  —  —  — — — —  —  — —  —  —  —  —  — —  —  — —  —  —  —  —  —  —  — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

E09826-P79548

 

FS INVESTMENT CORPORATIONKKR CAPITAL CORP. II

SpecialAnnual Meeting of Stockholders

[], 20182020

This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors

 

The undersigned hereby appoints Michael C. Forman and Stephen S. Sypherd and Lee M. Barnard, and each of them, as proxies of the undersigned with full power of substitution in each of them, to attend the Special2020 Annual Meeting of stockholdersStockholders of FS Investment CorporationKKR Capital Corp. II, a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), to be held at [●] [a.m.] [p.m. [a.m./p.m.], Eastern Time, on [●], 2018, at the offices of the Company, located2020, at 201 Rouse Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19112, and any adjournments or postponements thereof (the “Special“Annual Meeting”), and vote as designated on the reverse side of this proxy card all of the shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of the Company (“Shares”) held of record by the undersigned as of any applicable record date. The proxy statement and the accompanying materials are being mailed on or about [●], 20182020 to stockholders of record as of [●], 20182020 and are available atwww.proxyvote.com. All properly executed proxies representing Shares received prior to the SpecialAnnual Meeting will be voted in accordance with the instructions marked thereon.

 

If no instructions are marked,specification is made, the Shares will be voted (1) FOR the proposal to approveelect the investment advisoryfollowing individuals as Class C Directors, each of whom has been nominated for election for a three year term expiring at the 2023 annual meeting of the stockholders: (a) Michael C. Forman, (b) Richard Goldstein, (c) James H. Kropp and administrative services agreement by and between the Company and FSIC II Advisor, and the investment advisory and administrative services agreement by and between the Company and KKR Credit in Proposal 1, and(d) Elizabeth Sandler, (2) FOR the proposal to approve the investment advisory and administrative services agreement by and betweenapplication of the reduced asset coverage requirements in Section 61(a)(2) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, to the Company, which would permit the Company to increase the maximum amount of leverage that it is permitted to incur by reducing the asset coverage requirement applicable to the Company from 200% to 150% and (3) FOR the Joint Advisorproposal to allow the Company in Proposal 2.future offerings, following the listing of the Company’s common stock on a national securities exchange, to sell its Shares below net asset value per Share in order to provide flexibility for future salesNo. If any other business is presented at the Annual Meeting, this proxy will be voted by the proxies in their best judgment, including a motion to adjourn or postpone the Annual Meeting to another time and/or place for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies. At the present time, the board of directors of the Company knows of no other business to be presented at the SpecialAnnual Meeting.Any stockholder who has given a proxy has the right to revoke it at any time prior to its exercise.exercise. Any stockholder who executes a proxy may revoke it with respect to a proposal by attending the SpecialAnnual Meeting and voting his or her Shares in person or by submitting a letter of revocation or a later-dated proxy to the Company at the above address prior to the date of the SpecialAnnual Meeting.

 

Continued and to be signed on reverse side